Dismal Failure
Played in 136 Blue decks
530+50+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Baral, Chief of Compliance 1.0% of decks
Baral, Chief of Compliance 1.0% of decks
Ertai, Wizard Adept 2.4% of decks
Ertai, Wizard Adept 2.4% of decks
Thryx, the Sudden Storm 1.0% of decks
Thryx, the Sudden Storm 1.0% of decks
The Lunar Whale 1.9% of decks
The Lunar Whale 1.9% of decks
Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 1.0% of decks
Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 1.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Dismiss 50.7% of decks
Dismiss 50.7% of decks
Cancel 56.6% of decks
Cancel 56.6% of decks
Discombobulate 27.2% of decks
Discombobulate 27.2% of decks
Contradict 27.2% of decks
Contradict 27.2% of decks
Countermand 29.4% of decks
Countermand 29.4% of decks
Dissolve 37.5% of decks
Dissolve 37.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 1.79 · 1.0% (34 of 3,261 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.72 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.55 · 1.0% (2 of 198 decks)
- The Lunar Whale relevance 0.42 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.35 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dismiss relevance 2.31 · 50.7% (69 of 136 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.84 · 56.6% (77 of 136 decks)
- Discombobulate relevance 1.82 · 27.2% (37 of 136 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.70 · 27.2% (37 of 136 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.53 · 29.4% (40 of 136 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 1.49 · 37.5% (51 of 136 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 1.44 · 36.0% (49 of 136 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.40 · 22.8% (31 of 136 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.38 · 39.7% (54 of 136 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 1.37 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 1.32 · 33.8% (46 of 136 decks)
- Desertion relevance 1.29 · 31.6% (43 of 136 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.29 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.27 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.27 · 24.3% (33 of 136 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.19 · 22.8% (31 of 136 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.17 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Disallow relevance 1.14 · 40.4% (55 of 136 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.12 · 23.5% (32 of 136 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.11 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.08 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.02 · 21.3% (29 of 136 decks)
- Rewind relevance 1.01 · 45.6% (62 of 136 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.98 · 22.8% (31 of 136 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.98 · 31.6% (43 of 136 decks)
- Lay Bare relevance 0.96 · 14.7% (20 of 136 decks)
- Failed Inspection relevance 0.96 · 14.0% (19 of 136 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.92 · 21.3% (29 of 136 decks)
- Last Word relevance 0.92 · 16.2% (22 of 136 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.92 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dismiss relevance 2.31 · 50.7% (69 of 136 decks)
- Cancel relevance 1.84 · 56.6% (77 of 136 decks)
- Discombobulate relevance 1.82 · 27.2% (37 of 136 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.70 · 27.2% (37 of 136 decks)
- Countermand relevance 1.53 · 29.4% (40 of 136 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 1.49 · 37.5% (51 of 136 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 1.44 · 36.0% (49 of 136 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.40 · 22.8% (31 of 136 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 1.38 · 39.7% (54 of 136 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 1.37 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 1.32 · 33.8% (46 of 136 decks)
- Desertion relevance 1.29 · 31.6% (43 of 136 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 1.29 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.27 · 30.9% (42 of 136 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.27 · 24.3% (33 of 136 decks)
- Convolute relevance 1.19 · 22.8% (31 of 136 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.17 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Disallow relevance 1.14 · 40.4% (55 of 136 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.12 · 23.5% (32 of 136 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.11 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.08 · 19.9% (27 of 136 decks)
- Condescend relevance 1.02 · 21.3% (29 of 136 decks)
- Rewind relevance 1.01 · 45.6% (62 of 136 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.98 · 22.8% (31 of 136 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.98 · 31.6% (43 of 136 decks)
- Lay Bare relevance 0.96 · 14.7% (20 of 136 decks)
- Failed Inspection relevance 0.96 · 14.0% (19 of 136 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.92 · 21.3% (29 of 136 decks)
- Last Word relevance 0.92 · 16.2% (22 of 136 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.92 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.92 · 18.4% (25 of 136 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (20 of 136 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.90 · 24.3% (33 of 136 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.89 · 14.0% (19 of 136 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 0.86 · 13.2% (18 of 136 decks)
- Admiral's Order relevance 0.86 · 15.4% (21 of 136 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.84 · 15.4% (21 of 136 decks)
- Nullify relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (18 of 136 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.80 · 14.7% (20 of 136 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.79 · 19.1% (26 of 136 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (24 of 136 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 0.76 · 15.4% (21 of 136 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.75 · 23.5% (32 of 136 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 0.75 · 13.2% (18 of 136 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.74 · 40.4% (55 of 136 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.74 · 23.5% (32 of 136 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.73 · 25.0% (34 of 136 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 0.72 · 11.8% (16 of 136 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (20 of 136 decks)
- Quench relevance 0.69 · 12.5% (17 of 136 decks)
EDH data for Dismal Failure: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 136 real decks.














