Cards like Disallow
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Disallow 55%
- Ertai's Scorn 35%
- Cancel 33%
- Saw It Coming 26%
- Wizard's Retort 17%
- Sinister Sabotage 12%
- Scatter to the Winds 3%
- Broken Concentration 3%
- Admiral's Order 2%
- Twist Reality 2%
- Confirm Suspicions 2%
Other options: Forceful Denial, Fervent Denial
Cards like Rewind
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Counterspell
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
74% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 77%
- Negate 71%
- Essence Scatter 39%
- Wash Away 25%
- Spell Snare 6%
- Remove Soul 3%
- Stern Scolding 3%
- Minor Misstep 2%
- Wild Unraveling 2%
- Nullify 2%
- Disruption Protocol 2%
- Flash Counter 1%
- Intervene 1%
- False Summoning 1%
- Outwit 1%
Other options: Second Guess, Envelop, Extinguish, Preemptive Strike, Mystic Denial
Cards like Mana Leak
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mana Leak 53%
- Spell Pierce 41%
- Lose Focus 9%
- It'll Quench Ya! 5%
- Don't Make a Sound 4%
- Quench 4%
- Force Spike 4%
- Logic Knot 3%
- Clash of Wills 2%
- Make Disappear 1%
- Reasonable Doubt 1%
- Rethink 1%
Other options: Revolutionary Rebuff, Metallic Rebuke
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
5.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Exclude
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Exclude 19%
- Dismiss 19%
- Remand 18%
- Keep Safe 6%
- Bone to Ash 4%
- Disrupt 4%
- Confound 3%
- Contradict 2%
- Grip of Amnesia 1%
- Interdict 1%
Other options: Scatter Arc, Squelch, Halt Order, Runeboggle, Laquatus's Disdain, Force Void
Cards like Cryptic Command
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cryptic Command 35%
- Mystic Confluence 32%
- Sublime Epiphany 11%
Cards like Swan Song
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 46%
- Strix Serenade 25%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Tale's End
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Tale's End 38%
- Defabricate 19%
- Stifle 6%
- Consign to Memory 4%
Cards like Dispel
5.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dispel 38%
- Flusterstorm 26%
- Miscast 9%
- Turn Aside 3%
Cards like Force of Negation
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 36%
- Force of Will 33%
Cards like Dissipate
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dissipate 35%
- Delay 15%
- Syncopate 8%
- Void Shatter 3%
- Deny Existence 2%
- Reject 2%
- Deny the Divine 2%
- Spelljack 1%
- No Escape 1%
- Spell Shrivel 1%
Other options: Horribly Awry, Thranduil's Decree, Assert Authority, Liquify
Cards like Disdainful Stroke
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Disdainful Stroke 41%
- Brush Off 7%
- Out of Air 4%
- Overwhelming Denial 3%
- Last Word 2%
Cards like Haughty Djinn
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
- Haughty Djinn 37%
- Mocking Sprite 14%
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 40%
- Mystic Remora 32%
Cards like Dig Through Time
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dig Through Time 18%
- Impulse 14%
- Anticipate 4%
- Telling Time 2%
- Experimental Augury 1%
Cards like Refute
9.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Refute 21%
- Dream Fracture 8%
- Unravel 4%
- School Daze 2%
- Deny Entry 1%
Other options: Failed Inspection, Vex
Cards like Archmage's Charm
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Naiad of Hidden Coves
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Uthros Psionicist, Highspire Bell-Ringer
Cards like Dissolve
8.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards like Narset's Reversal
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards like Memory Lapse
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Memory Lapse 18%
- Hinder 3%
- Spell Crumple 3%
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.63 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Murmuring Mystic
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Guile relevance 0.79 · 37.8% (1,197 of 3,167 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.81 · 35.1% (1,111 of 3,167 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 0.74 · 34.6% (1,096 of 3,167 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.71 · 38.4% (1,215 of 3,167 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.58 · 53.4% (1,691 of 3,167 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.72 · 29.8% (943 of 3,167 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.56 · 54.5% (1,727 of 3,167 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.74 · 26.2% (830 of 3,167 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.78 · 19.2% (607 of 3,167 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.72 · 23.6% (746 of 3,167 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.78 · 14.9% (473 of 3,167 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.61 · 39.0% (1,234 of 3,167 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.74 · 19.4% (614 of 3,167 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.59 · 41.2% (1,306 of 3,167 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.69 · 26.0% (824 of 3,167 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.49 · 59.1% (1,871 of 3,167 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.74 · 16.0% (508 of 3,167 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.45 · 64.0% (2,026 of 3,167 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (603 of 3,167 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.60 · 33.5% (1,060 of 3,167 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.74 · 12.2% (386 of 3,167 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.55 · 36.8% (1,167 of 3,167 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.70 · 13.1% (416 of 3,167 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.43 · 54.4% (1,722 of 3,167 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.63 · 17.6% (557 of 3,167 decks)
- Lullmage Mentor relevance 0.62 · 17.8% (564 of 3,167 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.57 · 24.6% (778 of 3,167 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.61 · 18.3% (579 of 3,167 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.72 · 9.3% (295 of 3,167 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.60 · 18.9% (597 of 3,167 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.49 · 38.5% (1,219 of 3,167 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (747 of 3,167 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 0.77 · 5.3% (169 of 3,167 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.59 · 17.6% (556 of 3,167 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (448 of 3,167 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.46 · 40.7% (1,290 of 3,167 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.48 · 37.1% (1,175 of 3,167 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.46 · 41.1% (1,302 of 3,167 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.58 · 17.5% (554 of 3,167 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.59 · 15.4% (489 of 3,167 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.61 · 13.6% (431 of 3,167 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.51 · 27.4% (869 of 3,167 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 0.71 · 6.7% (212 of 3,167 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.67 · 8.8% (280 of 3,167 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (433 of 3,167 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.44 · 40.2% (1,272 of 3,167 decks)
- Niblis of Frost relevance 0.70 · 6.6% (208 of 3,167 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.48 · 32.1% (1,018 of 3,167 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.54 · 20.6% (652 of 3,167 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.66 · 8.3% (263 of 3,167 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Guile relevance 0.79 · 37.8% (1,197 of 3,167 decks)
- Naiad of Hidden Coves relevance 0.74 · 16.0% (508 of 3,167 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.55 · 36.8% (1,167 of 3,167 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.43 · 54.4% (1,722 of 3,167 decks)
- Lullmage Mentor relevance 0.62 · 17.8% (564 of 3,167 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (448 of 3,167 decks)
- Wavebreak Hippocamp relevance 0.46 · 40.7% (1,290 of 3,167 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.48 · 37.1% (1,175 of 3,167 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.61 · 13.6% (431 of 3,167 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.51 · 27.4% (869 of 3,167 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.44 · 40.2% (1,272 of 3,167 decks)
- Niblis of Frost relevance 0.70 · 6.6% (208 of 3,167 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (436 of 3,167 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 0.65 · 8.0% (254 of 3,167 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.47 · 26.3% (832 of 3,167 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.34 · 58.6% (1,857 of 3,167 decks)
- Windrider Wizard relevance 0.66 · 5.2% (165 of 3,167 decks)
- Thing in the Ice // Awoken Horror relevance 0.65 · 6.1% (194 of 3,167 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (310 of 3,167 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 0.76 · 4.0% (127 of 3,167 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.47 · 19.9% (630 of 3,167 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 0.58 · 6.3% (199 of 3,167 decks)
- Geyser Drake relevance 0.57 · 5.3% (167 of 3,167 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.50 · 9.8% (311 of 3,167 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.53 · 6.4% (203 of 3,167 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.41 · 20.1% (635 of 3,167 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.51 · 6.9% (219 of 3,167 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.52 · 6.1% (194 of 3,167 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.37 · 26.8% (850 of 3,167 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (270 of 3,167 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (420 of 3,167 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.56 · 4.5% (143 of 3,167 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 0.51 · 5.0% (157 of 3,167 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.38 · 19.7% (624 of 3,167 decks)
- Sphinx of the Chimes relevance 0.69 · 3.1% (97 of 3,167 decks)
- Hydro-Channeler relevance 0.56 · 4.3% (136 of 3,167 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.29 · 43.0% (1,362 of 3,167 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.52 · 4.5% (141 of 3,167 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.42 · 10.2% (322 of 3,167 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.30 · 34.5% (1,093 of 3,167 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (200 of 3,167 decks)
- Hypnotic Sprite // Mesmeric Glare relevance 0.64 · 2.9% (92 of 3,167 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.53 · 3.9% (123 of 3,167 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (148 of 3,167 decks)
- Tolarian Terror relevance 0.58 · 3.2% (100 of 3,167 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.35 · 13.7% (433 of 3,167 decks)
- Sphinx of the Final Word relevance 0.56 · 3.4% (107 of 3,167 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.53 · 3.6% (115 of 3,167 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (196 of 3,167 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (208 of 3,167 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.67 · 8.8% (280 of 3,167 decks)
- The Magic Mirror relevance 0.52 · 13.8% (437 of 3,167 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (274 of 3,167 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.56 · 5.4% (171 of 3,167 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.35 · 36.6% (1,158 of 3,167 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.36 · 23.3% (738 of 3,167 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.41 · 12.2% (385 of 3,167 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.48 · 5.4% (171 of 3,167 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (455 of 3,167 decks)
- Runechanter's Pike relevance 0.61 · 3.2% (100 of 3,167 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.56 · 3.5% (112 of 3,167 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (242 of 3,167 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.39 · 9.2% (291 of 3,167 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.30 · 23.0% (729 of 3,167 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (279 of 3,167 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.31 · 17.1% (543 of 3,167 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.32 · 13.7% (435 of 3,167 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (169 of 3,167 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.39 · 4.7% (148 of 3,167 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.28 · 16.6% (527 of 3,167 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (103 of 3,167 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.33 · 6.4% (202 of 3,167 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (256 of 3,167 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (239 of 3,167 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (105 of 3,167 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (161 of 3,167 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (89 of 3,167 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (122 of 3,167 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (172 of 3,167 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.35 · 4.1% (129 of 3,167 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (147 of 3,167 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (105 of 3,167 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (129 of 3,167 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.20 · 22.9% (726 of 3,167 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (106 of 3,167 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (85 of 3,167 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (127 of 3,167 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.22 · 10.6% (336 of 3,167 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (150 of 3,167 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 44.0% (1,393 of 3,167 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.12 · 60.8% (1,924 of 3,167 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (283 of 3,167 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (134 of 3,167 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 58.4% (1,848 of 3,167 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 75.4% (2,389 of 3,167 decks)
All enchantments (23)
- Telepathy relevance 0.74 · 26.2% (830 of 3,167 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.61 · 18.3% (579 of 3,167 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.60 · 18.9% (597 of 3,167 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 0.77 · 5.3% (169 of 3,167 decks)
- Precognition Field relevance 0.73 · 4.8% (153 of 3,167 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (356 of 3,167 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.56 · 10.0% (317 of 3,167 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.47 · 17.8% (565 of 3,167 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (378 of 3,167 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.34 · 35.4% (1,121 of 3,167 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.49 · 5.5% (174 of 3,167 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.39 · 9.9% (314 of 3,167 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (180 of 3,167 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (87 of 3,167 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (157 of 3,167 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.24 · 39.6% (1,255 of 3,167 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.31 · 15.6% (493 of 3,167 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 40.6% (1,287 of 3,167 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (183 of 3,167 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 31.9% (1,009 of 3,167 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (308 of 3,167 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (214 of 3,167 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (90 of 3,167 decks)
All instants (50)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.81 · 35.1% (1,111 of 3,167 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 0.74 · 34.6% (1,096 of 3,167 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.71 · 38.4% (1,215 of 3,167 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.58 · 53.4% (1,691 of 3,167 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.72 · 29.8% (943 of 3,167 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.56 · 54.5% (1,727 of 3,167 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.78 · 19.2% (607 of 3,167 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.72 · 23.6% (746 of 3,167 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.78 · 14.9% (473 of 3,167 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.61 · 39.0% (1,234 of 3,167 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.74 · 19.4% (614 of 3,167 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.59 · 41.2% (1,306 of 3,167 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.69 · 26.0% (824 of 3,167 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.49 · 59.1% (1,871 of 3,167 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.45 · 64.0% (2,026 of 3,167 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (603 of 3,167 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.60 · 33.5% (1,060 of 3,167 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.74 · 12.2% (386 of 3,167 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.70 · 13.1% (416 of 3,167 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.63 · 17.6% (557 of 3,167 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.57 · 24.6% (778 of 3,167 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.72 · 9.3% (295 of 3,167 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.49 · 38.5% (1,219 of 3,167 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (747 of 3,167 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.59 · 17.6% (556 of 3,167 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.46 · 41.1% (1,302 of 3,167 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.58 · 17.5% (554 of 3,167 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.59 · 15.4% (489 of 3,167 decks)
- Brush Off relevance 0.71 · 6.7% (212 of 3,167 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (433 of 3,167 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.48 · 32.1% (1,018 of 3,167 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.54 · 20.6% (652 of 3,167 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.66 · 8.3% (263 of 3,167 decks)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 0.62 · 10.8% (341 of 3,167 decks)
- Devious Cover-Up relevance 0.71 · 5.2% (164 of 3,167 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.62 · 9.7% (308 of 3,167 decks)
- Sage's Dousing relevance 0.78 · 4.3% (135 of 3,167 decks)
- Whirlwind Denial relevance 0.64 · 7.8% (247 of 3,167 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.72 · 4.5% (143 of 3,167 decks)
- Condescend relevance 0.66 · 5.5% (174 of 3,167 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.70 · 4.7% (148 of 3,167 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.47 · 25.3% (800 of 3,167 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 0.61 · 8.4% (267 of 3,167 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.62 · 7.5% (239 of 3,167 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.53 · 14.3% (454 of 3,167 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.55 · 12.1% (382 of 3,167 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.69 · 4.5% (144 of 3,167 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.64 · 5.3% (167 of 3,167 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.58 · 8.4% (267 of 3,167 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 0.69 · 4.4% (139 of 3,167 decks)
All sorceries (41)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.63 · 8.8% (278 of 3,167 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.62 · 7.9% (251 of 3,167 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.44 · 29.0% (919 of 3,167 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.56 · 8.3% (262 of 3,167 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.44 · 23.1% (732 of 3,167 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.51 · 12.4% (392 of 3,167 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.41 · 25.4% (806 of 3,167 decks)
- Wisdom of Ages relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (248 of 3,167 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (297 of 3,167 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (255 of 3,167 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.50 · 6.5% (205 of 3,167 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.62 · 3.9% (123 of 3,167 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.38 · 16.8% (533 of 3,167 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.47 · 5.0% (157 of 3,167 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.51 · 4.3% (137 of 3,167 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (214 of 3,167 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.43 · 6.4% (204 of 3,167 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.30 · 29.0% (918 of 3,167 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.41 · 8.3% (264 of 3,167 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.29 · 34.4% (1,089 of 3,167 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.50 · 4.2% (134 of 3,167 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (184 of 3,167 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.51 · 3.7% (118 of 3,167 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (293 of 3,167 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.25 · 39.0% (1,235 of 3,167 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.49 · 3.7% (117 of 3,167 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (209 of 3,167 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (116 of 3,167 decks)
- Polymorph relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (83 of 3,167 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (156 of 3,167 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.27 · 14.9% (471 of 3,167 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (108 of 3,167 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (135 of 3,167 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (87 of 3,167 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.42 · 3.1% (98 of 3,167 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (80 of 3,167 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (83 of 3,167 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (87 of 3,167 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (111 of 3,167 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (85 of 3,167 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (92 of 3,167 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.45 · 25.2% (798 of 3,167 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.59 · 7.0% (221 of 3,167 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.36 · 25.6% (810 of 3,167 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.48 · 4.4% (140 of 3,167 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (121 of 3,167 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.39 · 3.5% (110 of 3,167 decks)
All utility lands (31)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.49 · 14.2% (450 of 3,167 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.42 · 15.5% (491 of 3,167 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.41 · 14.9% (471 of 3,167 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.34 · 24.5% (775 of 3,167 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.53 · 4.4% (138 of 3,167 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.40 · 11.4% (360 of 3,167 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (159 of 3,167 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.43 · 6.5% (206 of 3,167 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.34 · 13.7% (434 of 3,167 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.37 · 8.5% (270 of 3,167 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.48 · 3.8% (121 of 3,167 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.37 · 5.9% (186 of 3,167 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.54 · 2.7% (85 of 3,167 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (217 of 3,167 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.30 · 11.7% (370 of 3,167 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.25 · 24.7% (782 of 3,167 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.27 · 15.5% (491 of 3,167 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.38 · 4.1% (130 of 3,167 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (279 of 3,167 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (296 of 3,167 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (574 of 3,167 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 60.9% (1,928 of 3,167 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (136 of 3,167 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (105 of 3,167 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.27 · 8.6% (272 of 3,167 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.28 · 5.7% (180 of 3,167 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (86 of 3,167 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (241 of 3,167 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 54.4% (1,723 of 3,167 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (82 of 3,167 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (117 of 3,167 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (16)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.54 · 4.7% (148 of 3,167 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.53 · 3.7% (117 of 3,167 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (162 of 3,167 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.38 · 6.8% (215 of 3,167 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (211 of 3,167 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (225 of 3,167 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (198 of 3,167 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (227 of 3,167 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (152 of 3,167 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (222 of 3,167 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (300 of 3,167 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.39 · 3.5% (110 of 3,167 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.36 · 4.1% (129 of 3,167 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (99 of 3,167 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (103 of 3,167 decks)
- Island relevance 0.03 · 89.6% (2,839 of 3,167 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Baral, Chief of Compliance, from 3,167 real Commander decks.