Color Identity Spread
34.7% Green
3030+36+3+4+2+1+2+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 3.84 · 85.3% (2,064 of 2,420 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 3.70 · 64.1% (3,501 of 5,464 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 3.02 · 54.7% (1,190 of 2,174 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 2.08 · 36.9% (319 of 864 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 1.99 · 45.4% (152 of 335 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 1.87 · 34.1% (214 of 627 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.84 · 29.3% (289 of 988 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 1.83 · 28.8% (298 of 1,035 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.79 · 26.3% (333 of 1,266 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 1.43 · 15.1% (522 of 3,451 decks)
- Timmy, Power Gamer relevance 1.39 · 57.1% (24 of 42 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 1.31 · 20.4% (124 of 608 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 1.25 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 1.09 · 23.2% (42 of 181 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.00 · 10.2% (249 of 2,434 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 0.96 · 12.8% (103 of 804 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.91 · 12.0% (96 of 802 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.87 · 40.9% (9 of 22 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.84 · 7.2% (362 of 5,029 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.83 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Loot, the Nexus relevance 0.83 · 25.9% (14 of 54 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.82 · 12.9% (51 of 396 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.81 · 7.8% (227 of 2,925 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.81 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.77 · 11.0% (58 of 525 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.69 · 11.9% (32 of 269 decks)
- Maular, the Next Evolution relevance 0.64 · 6.7% (114 of 1,696 decks)
- Shizuko, Caller of Autumn relevance 0.63 · 14.0% (17 of 121 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.61 · 10.5% (27 of 258 decks)
- Sakiko, Mother of Summer relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.48 · 46.6% (5,858 of 12,560 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.09 · 35.1% (4,408 of 12,560 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 1.05 · 43.6% (5,472 of 12,560 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.97 · 40.4% (5,069 of 12,560 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.95 · 31.7% (3,980 of 12,560 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.93 · 33.0% (4,149 of 12,560 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.93 · 49.3% (6,194 of 12,560 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.88 · 34.4% (4,320 of 12,560 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.86 · 25.5% (3,203 of 12,560 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.81 · 22.1% (2,771 of 12,560 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.81 · 35.2% (4,419 of 12,560 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.78 · 24.4% (3,062 of 12,560 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.77 · 31.7% (3,977 of 12,560 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.76 · 26.0% (3,271 of 12,560 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (2,281 of 12,560 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 0.75 · 19.6% (2,467 of 12,560 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.74 · 43.2% (5,427 of 12,560 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.73 · 20.4% (2,566 of 12,560 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.71 · 42.4% (5,326 of 12,560 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.70 · 31.8% (3,995 of 12,560 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.69 · 17.0% (2,138 of 12,560 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (1,934 of 12,560 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (2,103 of 12,560 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.66 · 19.1% (2,399 of 12,560 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 0.66 · 22.8% (2,864 of 12,560 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.65 · 27.3% (3,426 of 12,560 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.65 · 43.5% (5,463 of 12,560 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (1,868 of 12,560 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.64 · 17.3% (2,171 of 12,560 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (1,844 of 12,560 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.48 · 46.6% (5,858 of 12,560 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 1.05 · 43.6% (5,472 of 12,560 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.97 · 40.4% (5,069 of 12,560 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.95 · 31.7% (3,980 of 12,560 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.93 · 33.0% (4,149 of 12,560 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.93 · 49.3% (6,194 of 12,560 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.88 · 34.4% (4,320 of 12,560 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.86 · 25.5% (3,203 of 12,560 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.81 · 35.2% (4,419 of 12,560 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.78 · 24.4% (3,062 of 12,560 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.77 · 31.7% (3,977 of 12,560 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.76 · 26.0% (3,271 of 12,560 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.75 · 18.2% (2,281 of 12,560 decks)
- Jaspera Sentinel relevance 0.75 · 19.6% (2,467 of 12,560 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.74 · 43.2% (5,427 of 12,560 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.73 · 20.4% (2,566 of 12,560 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.71 · 42.4% (5,326 of 12,560 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.70 · 31.8% (3,995 of 12,560 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (1,934 of 12,560 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (2,103 of 12,560 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 0.66 · 22.8% (2,864 of 12,560 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.65 · 27.3% (3,426 of 12,560 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (1,868 of 12,560 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.64 · 17.3% (2,171 of 12,560 decks)
- Loam Dryad relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (1,844 of 12,560 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (1,967 of 12,560 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.63 · 17.5% (2,198 of 12,560 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 0.62 · 21.3% (2,676 of 12,560 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (1,880 of 12,560 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.61 · 16.4% (2,056 of 12,560 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.60 · 22.7% (2,846 of 12,560 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.60 · 12.9% (1,614 of 12,560 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.58 · 24.3% (3,057 of 12,560 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.57 · 18.2% (2,289 of 12,560 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.56 · 12.4% (1,554 of 12,560 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (2,113 of 12,560 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.81 · 22.1% (2,771 of 12,560 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.69 · 17.0% (2,138 of 12,560 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.57 · 16.0% (2,005 of 12,560 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.09 · 35.1% (4,408 of 12,560 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.66 · 19.1% (2,399 of 12,560 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.65 · 43.5% (5,463 of 12,560 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.57 · 28.0% (3,520 of 12,560 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.61 · 28.0% (3,518 of 12,560 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.57 · 45.2% (5,681 of 12,560 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.59 · 23.2% (2,910 of 12,560 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.63 · 48.8% (6,132 of 12,560 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.56 · 43.4% (5,445 of 12,560 decks)
All lands (2)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.78 · 19.5% (2,448 of 12,560 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.78 · 19.4% (2,437 of 12,560 decks)
EDH data for Worldspine Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 12,560 real decks.





























































