Redwood Treefolk
Played in 39 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
15.4% Selesnya
All commanders (1)
- Syr Joshua and Syr Saxon relevance 1.00 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.13 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 2.05 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.00 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 1.92 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.82 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.80 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.78 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.77 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.69 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.59 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.58 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.57 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.56 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.54 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.50 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.50 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.42 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.39 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.36 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Barbtooth Wurm relevance 1.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 1.26 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.23 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.19 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.16 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.13 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.10 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Panther Warriors relevance 2.13 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 2.05 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.00 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 1.92 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.82 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.78 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.77 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 1.69 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.59 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 1.58 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.57 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.56 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.54 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.50 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.50 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.42 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.39 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.36 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Barbtooth Wurm relevance 1.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 1.26 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.23 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.19 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.16 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.13 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.10 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 1.07 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.06 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.05 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.05 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.04 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.89 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.50 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.44 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.80 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.88 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.81 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.77 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.63 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.45 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
All instants (2)
- Fog relevance 0.86 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.48 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.54 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.51 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.47 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
EDH data for Redwood Treefolk: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 39 real decks.