Redwood Treefolk
Played in 67 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
26.5% Green
830+48+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 2.16 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Fangorn, Tree Shepherd relevance 2.12 · 1.6% (18 of 1,153 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.04 · 1.3% (19 of 1,506 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.39 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 0.91 · 2.9% (2 of 70 decks)
- Meng Huo, Barbarian King relevance 0.70 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.64 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 2.17 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Battlewand Oak relevance 1.75 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.65 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Ghoultree relevance 1.62 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Rootless Yew relevance 1.53 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Everbark Shaman relevance 1.51 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 1.51 · 34.3% (23 of 67 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 1.50 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 1.48 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.48 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- Ghastbark Twins relevance 1.47 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 1.47 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 1.47 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.44 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 1.41 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.41 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.38 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Mossbeard Ancient relevance 1.36 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 1.35 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 1.32 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.32 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 1.30 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Weatherseed Treefolk relevance 1.28 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Lumberknot relevance 1.27 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.27 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Ulvenwald Observer relevance 1.26 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 1.24 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.24 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 1.23 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.21 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
All creatures (48)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 2.17 · 35.8% (24 of 67 decks)
- Battlewand Oak relevance 1.75 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 1.65 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Ghoultree relevance 1.62 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Rootless Yew relevance 1.53 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Everbark Shaman relevance 1.51 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 1.51 · 34.3% (23 of 67 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 1.50 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Orchard Warden relevance 1.48 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.48 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
- Ghastbark Twins relevance 1.47 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Treefolk Harbinger relevance 1.47 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 1.47 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.44 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 1.41 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.41 · 28.4% (19 of 67 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.38 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Mossbeard Ancient relevance 1.36 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 1.35 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Bosk Banneret relevance 1.32 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.32 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 1.30 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Weatherseed Treefolk relevance 1.28 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Lumberknot relevance 1.27 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.27 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Ulvenwald Observer relevance 1.26 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 1.24 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.24 · 32.8% (22 of 67 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 1.23 · 25.4% (17 of 67 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.21 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Unstoppable Ash relevance 1.21 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Seedguide Ash relevance 1.20 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.20 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Warden of the Woods relevance 1.20 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 1.20 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.20 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.19 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Deadwood Treefolk relevance 1.19 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.16 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 1.15 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Elder relevance 1.13 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.10 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 1.10 · 29.9% (20 of 67 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 1.09 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.07 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.06 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 1.06 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.06 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
All instants (1)
- Reach of Branches relevance 1.15 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 1.12 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
EDH data for Redwood Treefolk: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 67 real decks.






























