Elixir
Played in 334 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
3.2% Green
- Azorius 1,064 · 10.1%
- Izzet 772 · 7.3%
- Five-Color 625 · 5.9%
- Black 617 · 5.8%
- Boros 575 · 5.4%
- Blue 560 · 5.3%
- Esper 507 · 4.8%
- Grixis 467 · 4.4%
- White 443 · 4.2%
- Dimir 420 · 4.0%
- Rakdos 402 · 3.8%
- Golgari 395 · 3.7%
- Sultai 377 · 3.6%
- Orzhov 366 · 3.5%
- Red 343 · 3.2%
- Green 334 · 3.2%
- Bant 330 · 3.1%
- Naya 297 · 2.8%
- Colorless 280 · 2.7%
- Selesnya 258 · 2.4%
- Mardu 214 · 2.0%
- Other (11) 918 · 8.7%
All commanders (8)
- Oviya Pashiri, Sage Lifecrafter relevance 5.18 · 36.7% (165 of 449 decks)
- Strong, the Brutish Thespian relevance 0.98 · 1.7% (8 of 480 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.88 · 1.4% (7 of 489 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.47 · 1.5% (2 of 132 decks)
- Reptil, Dinomorpher relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Arashi, the Sky Asunder relevance 0.42 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Tigra, Feline Fury relevance 0.31 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Iwamori of the Open Fist relevance 0.27 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Scavenger Folk relevance 3.03 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Team Pennant relevance 2.81 · 43.1% (144 of 334 decks)
- Turn to Dust relevance 2.77 · 41.6% (139 of 334 decks)
- Cenote Scout relevance 2.75 · 43.4% (145 of 334 decks)
- Permeating Mass relevance 2.68 · 46.1% (154 of 334 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 2.67 · 46.1% (154 of 334 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 2.66 · 45.8% (153 of 334 decks)
- Oashra Cultivator relevance 2.64 · 41.3% (138 of 334 decks)
- Llanowar Augur relevance 2.62 · 41.3% (138 of 334 decks)
- Unbridled Growth relevance 2.59 · 41.9% (140 of 334 decks)
- Traproot Kami relevance 2.58 · 45.5% (152 of 334 decks)
- Ornamental Courage relevance 2.56 · 44.6% (149 of 334 decks)
- Seedling Charm relevance 2.55 · 43.7% (146 of 334 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 2.53 · 45.2% (151 of 334 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 2.52 · 46.7% (156 of 334 decks)
- Mending Touch relevance 2.52 · 43.7% (146 of 334 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 2.49 · 45.5% (152 of 334 decks)
- Elvish Lyrist relevance 2.48 · 44.3% (148 of 334 decks)
- Mold Adder relevance 2.47 · 44.3% (148 of 334 decks)
- Prosthetic Injector relevance 2.44 · 44.0% (147 of 334 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 2.41 · 42.8% (143 of 334 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 2.40 · 45.5% (152 of 334 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 2.39 · 44.0% (147 of 334 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 2.38 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Dryad's Favor relevance 2.38 · 41.9% (140 of 334 decks)
- High Stride relevance 2.38 · 45.8% (153 of 334 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 2.36 · 47.6% (159 of 334 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 2.27 · 47.6% (159 of 334 decks)
- Neverwinter Dryad relevance 2.25 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Heirloom Epic relevance 2.24 · 44.6% (149 of 334 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Scavenger Folk relevance 3.03 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Cenote Scout relevance 2.75 · 43.4% (145 of 334 decks)
- Permeating Mass relevance 2.68 · 46.1% (154 of 334 decks)
- Druid Lyrist relevance 2.67 · 46.1% (154 of 334 decks)
- Oashra Cultivator relevance 2.64 · 41.3% (138 of 334 decks)
- Llanowar Augur relevance 2.62 · 41.3% (138 of 334 decks)
- Traproot Kami relevance 2.58 · 45.5% (152 of 334 decks)
- Elvish Lyrist relevance 2.48 · 44.3% (148 of 334 decks)
- Mold Adder relevance 2.47 · 44.3% (148 of 334 decks)
- Turtle-Duck relevance 2.41 · 42.8% (143 of 334 decks)
- Llanowar Mentor relevance 2.40 · 45.5% (152 of 334 decks)
- Caustic Caterpillar relevance 2.27 · 47.6% (159 of 334 decks)
- Neverwinter Dryad relevance 2.25 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Gran Pulse Ochu relevance 2.19 · 53.3% (178 of 334 decks)
- Young Wolf relevance 2.19 · 39.5% (132 of 334 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 2.04 · 45.5% (152 of 334 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 2.02 · 43.1% (144 of 334 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 1.96 · 42.8% (143 of 334 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 1.74 · 55.4% (185 of 334 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Team Pennant relevance 2.81 · 43.1% (144 of 334 decks)
- Prosthetic Injector relevance 2.44 · 44.0% (147 of 334 decks)
- Heirloom Epic relevance 2.24 · 44.6% (149 of 334 decks)
- Cliffhaven Kitesail relevance 2.21 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 2.15 · 46.1% (154 of 334 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Frog Tongue relevance 2.66 · 45.8% (153 of 334 decks)
- Unbridled Growth relevance 2.59 · 41.9% (140 of 334 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 2.53 · 45.2% (151 of 334 decks)
- Dryad's Favor relevance 2.38 · 41.9% (140 of 334 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 2.21 · 47.6% (159 of 334 decks)
- Audacity relevance 1.95 · 46.4% (155 of 334 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 1.90 · 43.1% (144 of 334 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 1.79 · 46.1% (154 of 334 decks)
All instants (15)
- Turn to Dust relevance 2.77 · 41.6% (139 of 334 decks)
- Ornamental Courage relevance 2.56 · 44.6% (149 of 334 decks)
- Seedling Charm relevance 2.55 · 43.7% (146 of 334 decks)
- Sudden Spinnerets relevance 2.52 · 46.7% (156 of 334 decks)
- Mending Touch relevance 2.52 · 43.7% (146 of 334 decks)
- Leaping Ambush relevance 2.49 · 45.5% (152 of 334 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 2.39 · 44.0% (147 of 334 decks)
- High Stride relevance 2.38 · 45.8% (153 of 334 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 2.36 · 47.6% (159 of 334 decks)
- Arachnoid Adaptation relevance 2.22 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 2.20 · 49.1% (164 of 334 decks)
- Warriors' Lesson relevance 2.19 · 46.4% (155 of 334 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 1.96 · 47.6% (159 of 334 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 1.91 · 47.3% (158 of 334 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 1.86 · 46.1% (154 of 334 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 2.38 · 44.9% (150 of 334 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 2.06 · 44.3% (148 of 334 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 1.78 · 43.1% (144 of 334 decks)
EDH data for Elixir: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 334 real decks.