Panglacial Wurm
Played in 84 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Temur
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Susan Foreman // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 1.90 · 2.7% (11 of 414 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor relevance 1.62 · 1.6% (10 of 612 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Amy Pond relevance 1.51 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.67 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 1.33 · 27.4% (23 of 84 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.28 · 35.7% (30 of 84 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.12 · 45.2% (38 of 84 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 1.07 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.05 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 1.03 · 28.6% (24 of 84 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 1.02 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 1.00 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.98 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.92 · 39.3% (33 of 84 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.91 · 29.8% (25 of 84 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.87 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.84 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.80 · 32.1% (27 of 84 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.78 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.78 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.77 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.75 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Bigger on the Inside relevance 0.75 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.75 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Call Forth the Tempest relevance 0.74 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Bloodbraid Challenger relevance 0.73 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.72 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.69 · 26.2% (22 of 84 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.68 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.66 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.28 · 35.7% (30 of 84 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 1.12 · 45.2% (38 of 84 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 1.03 · 28.6% (24 of 84 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.92 · 39.3% (33 of 84 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.91 · 29.8% (25 of 84 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.84 · 25.0% (21 of 84 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.78 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.77 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.75 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.75 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Bloodbraid Challenger relevance 0.73 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.72 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.62 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.61 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.61 · 23.8% (20 of 84 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.61 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.60 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
- Etherium-Horn Sorcerer relevance 0.60 · 15.5% (13 of 84 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.59 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.59 · 23.8% (20 of 84 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.59 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Noise Marine relevance 0.57 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.56 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 0.55 · 9.5% (8 of 84 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Bigger on the Inside relevance 0.75 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.68 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
All instants (1)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.77 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
All sorceries (14)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 1.33 · 27.4% (23 of 84 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 1.07 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.05 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 1.02 · 19.0% (16 of 84 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.98 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.87 · 20.2% (17 of 84 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.80 · 32.1% (27 of 84 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.78 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
- Call Forth the Tempest relevance 0.74 · 21.4% (18 of 84 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.69 · 26.2% (22 of 84 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.66 · 10.7% (9 of 84 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Into the Time Vortex relevance 0.63 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.61 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 1.00 · 22.6% (19 of 84 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.67 · 13.1% (11 of 84 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.60 · 17.9% (15 of 84 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.55 · 28.6% (24 of 84 decks)
EDH data for Panglacial Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 84 real decks.