Panglacial Wurm
Played in 164 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
4.0% Simic
All commanders (8)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 1.81 · 1.0% (33 of 3,178 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 1.59 · 2.4% (10 of 417 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.78 · 1.4% (3 of 216 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Thirteenth Doctor relevance 0.73 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Sixth Doctor relevance 0.68 · 1.9% (2 of 108 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.49 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.39 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.78 · 26.8% (44 of 164 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.75 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.71 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.69 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.60 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.60 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.60 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.59 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.59 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.58 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.54 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.54 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.50 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.48 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.48 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.48 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
All creatures (25)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.78 · 26.8% (44 of 164 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.75 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.71 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.69 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.67 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.60 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.60 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.60 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.59 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.59 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (26 of 164 decks)
- Sapphire Dragon // Psionic Pulse relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.50 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.48 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.48 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Hammerhead Tyrant relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (15 of 164 decks)
- Generous Ent relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Tanufel Rimespeaker relevance 0.47 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Horned Loch-Whale // Lagoon Breach relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.46 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.45 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.58 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.47 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.45 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
All instants (5)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.48 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.45 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.45 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.44 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Migration Path relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.54 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.54 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.53 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 20.7% (34 of 164 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.48 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.46 · 36.6% (60 of 164 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.46 · 9.8% (16 of 164 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.63 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.59 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.57 · 29.9% (49 of 164 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 28.7% (47 of 164 decks)
EDH data for Panglacial Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 164 real decks.