Cards like Apex Devastator
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 55% of other Simic decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 63%
- Kodama's Reach 51%
- Rampant Growth 43%
- Search for Tomorrow 22%
- Migration Path 17%
- Explosive Vegetation 14%
- Verdant Mastery 11%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Map the Frontier 4%
- Grow from the Ashes 4%
- Reach the Horizon 3%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
- Roamer's Routine 1%
- Terramorph 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
Other options: Peregrination, Beneath the Sands, Primal Growth, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Deep Reconnaissance, Path to the Festival
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 23%
- Mana Reflection 21%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 33%
- Skyshroud Claim 31%
- Three Visits 25%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 6%
- Ranger's Path 4%
- Hunting Wilds 2%
- Glimpse the Core 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Harrow
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea
20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Troyan, Gutsy Explorer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 19%
- Hedron Archive 7%
- Sisay's Ring 2%
Other options: Ur-Golem's Eye, Ring of the Lucii, Sceptre of Eternal Glory, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Kozilek's Unsealing
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sublime Epiphany
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nulldrifter 37%
- Wretched Gryff 8%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 32%
- Elvish Mystic 23%
- Fyndhorn Elves 13%
- Gyre Engineer 4%
- Boreal Druid 3%
Other options: Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Druid of the Cowl, Nantuko Elder, Goobbue Gardener, Rootrider Faun, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Golden Hind, Orochi Sustainer, Woodland Mystic, Leaf Gilder, Skyshroud Troopers, Wirewood Elf
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards like Thunderous Snapper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Earthshaker Giant, Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 50%
- Commander's Sphere 10%
Cards like Natural Reclamation
8.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Natural Reclamation 20%
- Krosan Grip 5%
- Naturalize 2%
Other options: Wilt, Oxidize, Relic Crush, Break Asunder, Stomp and Howl, Wear Away, Verdigris
Cards like Dawnglade Regent
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Azure Fleet Admiral, Entourage of Trest, Keeper of Keys
All top picks (50)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.85 · 48.3% (1,500 of 3,105 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.71 · 60.9% (1,890 of 3,105 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.94 · 26.9% (836 of 3,105 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.74 · 50.7% (1,574 of 3,105 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.90 · 30.9% (959 of 3,105 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.91 · 28.6% (887 of 3,105 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.89 · 29.0% (901 of 3,105 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.85 · 33.3% (1,035 of 3,105 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.82 · 36.7% (1,138 of 3,105 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.91 · 20.7% (642 of 3,105 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.83 · 28.6% (888 of 3,105 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.80 · 31.7% (983 of 3,105 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.68 · 46.4% (1,441 of 3,105 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.57 · 61.8% (1,919 of 3,105 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.88 · 17.7% (549 of 3,105 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.71 · 38.0% (1,179 of 3,105 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.86 · 19.8% (614 of 3,105 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.70 · 37.4% (1,160 of 3,105 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.67 · 41.3% (1,282 of 3,105 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.66 · 40.7% (1,265 of 3,105 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.83 · 16.6% (515 of 3,105 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.73 · 27.3% (847 of 3,105 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.82 · 15.6% (483 of 3,105 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.75 · 23.8% (738 of 3,105 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.63 · 39.6% (1,230 of 3,105 decks)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 0.95 · 8.3% (259 of 3,105 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.70 · 27.2% (845 of 3,105 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.73 · 21.4% (666 of 3,105 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.61 · 39.8% (1,235 of 3,105 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.74 · 20.0% (621 of 3,105 decks)
- Mockery of Nature relevance 0.93 · 7.2% (223 of 3,105 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.73 · 19.4% (602 of 3,105 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.69 · 25.8% (800 of 3,105 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.61 · 37.2% (1,154 of 3,105 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.67 · 27.1% (842 of 3,105 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.80 · 12.8% (396 of 3,105 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 0.93 · 6.1% (190 of 3,105 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.75 · 15.7% (488 of 3,105 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.70 · 21.9% (681 of 3,105 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.81 · 11.3% (352 of 3,105 decks)
- Lashweed Lurker relevance 0.92 · 6.2% (192 of 3,105 decks)
- Vexing Scuttler relevance 0.92 · 6.1% (189 of 3,105 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (387 of 3,105 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.82 · 10.6% (330 of 3,105 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.82 · 10.7% (331 of 3,105 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.60 · 34.3% (1,064 of 3,105 decks)
- Decimator of the Provinces relevance 0.83 · 9.3% (288 of 3,105 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.88 · 6.0% (187 of 3,105 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.60 · 31.2% (968 of 3,105 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.83 · 8.2% (256 of 3,105 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.85 · 48.3% (1,500 of 3,105 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.71 · 60.9% (1,890 of 3,105 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.94 · 26.9% (836 of 3,105 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.74 · 50.7% (1,574 of 3,105 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.90 · 30.9% (959 of 3,105 decks)
- Krosan Drover relevance 0.91 · 28.6% (887 of 3,105 decks)
- Primeval Protector relevance 0.89 · 29.0% (901 of 3,105 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.85 · 33.3% (1,035 of 3,105 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.82 · 36.7% (1,138 of 3,105 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.91 · 20.7% (642 of 3,105 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.83 · 28.6% (888 of 3,105 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.80 · 31.7% (983 of 3,105 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.57 · 61.8% (1,919 of 3,105 decks)
- Bygone Colossus relevance 0.88 · 17.7% (549 of 3,105 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.86 · 19.8% (614 of 3,105 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.70 · 37.4% (1,160 of 3,105 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.67 · 41.3% (1,282 of 3,105 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.66 · 40.7% (1,265 of 3,105 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.83 · 16.6% (515 of 3,105 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.82 · 15.6% (483 of 3,105 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.75 · 23.8% (738 of 3,105 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.63 · 39.6% (1,230 of 3,105 decks)
- Wretched Gryff relevance 0.95 · 8.3% (259 of 3,105 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.70 · 27.2% (845 of 3,105 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.73 · 21.4% (666 of 3,105 decks)
- Mockery of Nature relevance 0.93 · 7.2% (223 of 3,105 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.73 · 19.4% (602 of 3,105 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.67 · 27.1% (842 of 3,105 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.80 · 12.8% (396 of 3,105 decks)
- It of the Horrid Swarm relevance 0.93 · 6.1% (190 of 3,105 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.75 · 15.7% (488 of 3,105 decks)
- Lashweed Lurker relevance 0.92 · 6.2% (192 of 3,105 decks)
- Vexing Scuttler relevance 0.92 · 6.1% (189 of 3,105 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.79 · 12.5% (387 of 3,105 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.82 · 10.7% (331 of 3,105 decks)
- Decimator of the Provinces relevance 0.83 · 9.3% (288 of 3,105 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.88 · 6.0% (187 of 3,105 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.60 · 31.2% (968 of 3,105 decks)
- Drownyard Lurker relevance 0.87 · 5.9% (183 of 3,105 decks)
- Tangle Golem relevance 0.91 · 4.8% (148 of 3,105 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (401 of 3,105 decks)
- Keruga, the Macrosage relevance 0.70 · 13.4% (415 of 3,105 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.54 · 36.0% (1,118 of 3,105 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.81 · 7.0% (217 of 3,105 decks)
- Mechanozoa relevance 0.82 · 5.7% (178 of 3,105 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.73 · 10.9% (338 of 3,105 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.69 · 13.5% (418 of 3,105 decks)
- Drownyard Behemoth relevance 0.90 · 4.4% (137 of 3,105 decks)
- Snapping Voidcraw relevance 0.69 · 11.5% (357 of 3,105 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 0.87 · 4.5% (140 of 3,105 decks)
All artifacts (39)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.83 · 8.2% (256 of 3,105 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.69 · 13.8% (429 of 3,105 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.77 · 8.5% (265 of 3,105 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.63 · 19.9% (618 of 3,105 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.80 · 6.0% (187 of 3,105 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.60 · 18.6% (576 of 3,105 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.69 · 7.7% (239 of 3,105 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.69 · 6.9% (215 of 3,105 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.67 · 6.0% (186 of 3,105 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.62 · 8.5% (264 of 3,105 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.66 · 5.6% (174 of 3,105 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.43 · 26.8% (832 of 3,105 decks)
- Ingenuity Engine relevance 0.84 · 3.0% (93 of 3,105 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.63 · 4.7% (147 of 3,105 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.48 · 8.2% (254 of 3,105 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.65 · 3.4% (106 of 3,105 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.74 · 2.5% (79 of 3,105 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.43 · 10.0% (310 of 3,105 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (154 of 3,105 decks)
- Darksteel Monolith relevance 0.68 · 2.6% (81 of 3,105 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (154 of 3,105 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (101 of 3,105 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.52 · 3.6% (113 of 3,105 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.59 · 2.5% (79 of 3,105 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.48 · 3.5% (110 of 3,105 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.28 · 19.6% (608 of 3,105 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.29 · 16.3% (507 of 3,105 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (245 of 3,105 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.27 · 18.6% (577 of 3,105 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (145 of 3,105 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (113 of 3,105 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.49 · 2.5% (78 of 3,105 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.24 · 21.3% (662 of 3,105 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.25 · 15.1% (468 of 3,105 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (88 of 3,105 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (109 of 3,105 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.34 · 3.1% (96 of 3,105 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 50.4% (1,565 of 3,105 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 63.2% (1,961 of 3,105 decks)
All enchantments (38)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.68 · 46.4% (1,441 of 3,105 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.71 · 38.0% (1,179 of 3,105 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.69 · 25.8% (800 of 3,105 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.61 · 37.2% (1,154 of 3,105 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.70 · 21.9% (681 of 3,105 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.57 · 31.8% (988 of 3,105 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.78 · 6.1% (190 of 3,105 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.65 · 12.4% (384 of 3,105 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.73 · 6.6% (204 of 3,105 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.54 · 21.4% (666 of 3,105 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.71 · 5.7% (176 of 3,105 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.67 · 6.9% (215 of 3,105 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.71 · 4.3% (135 of 3,105 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.35 · 50.1% (1,556 of 3,105 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.74 · 4.0% (123 of 3,105 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.55 · 6.1% (190 of 3,105 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.71 · 3.2% (100 of 3,105 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.40 · 14.9% (462 of 3,105 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.51 · 5.0% (156 of 3,105 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (354 of 3,105 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.52 · 4.7% (146 of 3,105 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.43 · 7.6% (235 of 3,105 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.62 · 3.1% (97 of 3,105 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.39 · 5.4% (167 of 3,105 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.48 · 3.7% (114 of 3,105 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (200 of 3,105 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (106 of 3,105 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (95 of 3,105 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (84 of 3,105 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (94 of 3,105 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (310 of 3,105 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.41 · 2.8% (87 of 3,105 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (95 of 3,105 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (90 of 3,105 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (127 of 3,105 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (89 of 3,105 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (112 of 3,105 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (77 of 3,105 decks)
All instants (50)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.74 · 20.0% (621 of 3,105 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.82 · 10.6% (330 of 3,105 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.60 · 34.3% (1,064 of 3,105 decks)
- Mental Journey relevance 0.87 · 5.2% (162 of 3,105 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.75 · 10.6% (328 of 3,105 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.78 · 8.4% (262 of 3,105 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.63 · 21.3% (661 of 3,105 decks)
- Rowdy Research relevance 0.80 · 6.1% (190 of 3,105 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.63 · 16.2% (502 of 3,105 decks)
- Into the Story relevance 0.74 · 8.0% (249 of 3,105 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.80 · 4.7% (145 of 3,105 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.85 · 3.8% (119 of 3,105 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.62 · 6.6% (206 of 3,105 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.44 · 21.1% (656 of 3,105 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.70 · 3.7% (114 of 3,105 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.55 · 5.3% (164 of 3,105 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.40 · 23.2% (719 of 3,105 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (247 of 3,105 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (180 of 3,105 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.37 · 11.3% (352 of 3,105 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.34 · 13.5% (419 of 3,105 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.40 · 5.2% (161 of 3,105 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (152 of 3,105 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (286 of 3,105 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.31 · 13.1% (406 of 3,105 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (118 of 3,105 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.50 · 2.6% (82 of 3,105 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (115 of 3,105 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (265 of 3,105 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (241 of 3,105 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.46 · 2.5% (78 of 3,105 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (138 of 3,105 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (130 of 3,105 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (172 of 3,105 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (129 of 3,105 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.24 · 10.3% (320 of 3,105 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (268 of 3,105 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (290 of 3,105 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.20 · 14.1% (437 of 3,105 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.17 · 29.4% (912 of 3,105 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (95 of 3,105 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.15 · 30.6% (949 of 3,105 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (130 of 3,105 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (85 of 3,105 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (91 of 3,105 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (129 of 3,105 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (193 of 3,105 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.14 · 17.3% (536 of 3,105 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.19 · 4.4% (136 of 3,105 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (77 of 3,105 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.73 · 27.3% (847 of 3,105 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.61 · 39.8% (1,235 of 3,105 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.81 · 11.3% (352 of 3,105 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.83 · 5.8% (181 of 3,105 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.61 · 22.5% (698 of 3,105 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.69 · 12.0% (372 of 3,105 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.60 · 17.4% (540 of 3,105 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.70 · 9.1% (283 of 3,105 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.74 · 6.7% (207 of 3,105 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.70 · 8.3% (257 of 3,105 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.74 · 6.0% (185 of 3,105 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.68 · 9.2% (285 of 3,105 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.69 · 7.8% (243 of 3,105 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (436 of 3,105 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (324 of 3,105 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (422 of 3,105 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.71 · 4.9% (152 of 3,105 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.66 · 6.3% (196 of 3,105 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.80 · 4.0% (123 of 3,105 decks)
- Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.67 · 5.2% (163 of 3,105 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.64 · 6.7% (207 of 3,105 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.44 · 31.3% (971 of 3,105 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.44 · 32.2% (1,000 of 3,105 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.64 · 5.1% (158 of 3,105 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.61 · 7.2% (224 of 3,105 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.63 · 5.7% (177 of 3,105 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.60 · 7.4% (231 of 3,105 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.60 · 6.0% (187 of 3,105 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.62 · 5.0% (156 of 3,105 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.48 · 13.9% (432 of 3,105 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.46 · 16.8% (521 of 3,105 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.57 · 5.7% (177 of 3,105 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.64 · 4.3% (134 of 3,105 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.55 · 6.9% (215 of 3,105 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.56 · 5.4% (167 of 3,105 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.54 · 5.8% (180 of 3,105 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.55 · 5.2% (162 of 3,105 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.51 · 7.8% (243 of 3,105 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.53 · 5.1% (159 of 3,105 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.56 · 4.6% (142 of 3,105 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.63 · 3.6% (112 of 3,105 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.63 · 3.6% (113 of 3,105 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.60 · 3.8% (119 of 3,105 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.68 · 2.9% (90 of 3,105 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.41 · 12.4% (385 of 3,105 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (151 of 3,105 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.47 · 6.0% (185 of 3,105 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.72 · 2.5% (78 of 3,105 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.54 · 4.2% (130 of 3,105 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.59 · 3.3% (104 of 3,105 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.53 · 23.5% (729 of 3,105 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.62 · 4.6% (143 of 3,105 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.67 · 4.0% (125 of 3,105 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.64 · 3.6% (111 of 3,105 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.60 · 3.1% (96 of 3,105 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.36 · 2.9% (89 of 3,105 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.66 · 7.3% (227 of 3,105 decks)
All utility lands (40)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.71 · 19.8% (614 of 3,105 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.62 · 12.2% (378 of 3,105 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.55 · 14.8% (459 of 3,105 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.48 · 17.6% (545 of 3,105 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (390 of 3,105 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.71 · 3.5% (108 of 3,105 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.50 · 5.8% (180 of 3,105 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.34 · 29.0% (900 of 3,105 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.47 · 5.7% (176 of 3,105 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.46 · 6.0% (185 of 3,105 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 0.64 · 2.5% (79 of 3,105 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (191 of 3,105 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.31 · 19.5% (606 of 3,105 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.52 · 3.5% (110 of 3,105 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.33 · 9.8% (304 of 3,105 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.29 · 15.5% (481 of 3,105 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.33 · 8.1% (251 of 3,105 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (122 of 3,105 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 14.9% (464 of 3,105 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 6.7% (209 of 3,105 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.27 · 13.2% (409 of 3,105 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 16.3% (507 of 3,105 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (185 of 3,105 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.46 · 2.7% (85 of 3,105 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.41 · 3.3% (104 of 3,105 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.26 · 12.7% (395 of 3,105 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (85 of 3,105 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (110 of 3,105 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 29.4% (913 of 3,105 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (373 of 3,105 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (100 of 3,105 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (105 of 3,105 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (124 of 3,105 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (401 of 3,105 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (90 of 3,105 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (84 of 3,105 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (88 of 3,105 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (206 of 3,105 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 39.2% (1,217 of 3,105 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (128 of 3,105 decks)
All lands (50)
- Wastes relevance 0.74 · 5.1% (159 of 3,105 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.71 · 6.4% (198 of 3,105 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.68 · 5.1% (159 of 3,105 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.70 · 3.6% (112 of 3,105 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.50 · 5.2% (160 of 3,105 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (297 of 3,105 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.33 · 26.5% (822 of 3,105 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.38 · 11.6% (361 of 3,105 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.39 · 9.1% (283 of 3,105 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (503 of 3,105 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (170 of 3,105 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (147 of 3,105 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (146 of 3,105 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.32 · 15.9% (493 of 3,105 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (156 of 3,105 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (154 of 3,105 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.27 · 17.7% (549 of 3,105 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.27 · 14.4% (448 of 3,105 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (127 of 3,105 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.31 · 9.3% (288 of 3,105 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.32 · 7.1% (220 of 3,105 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (188 of 3,105 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (323 of 3,105 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.33 · 5.7% (176 of 3,105 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.27 · 14.0% (434 of 3,105 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (115 of 3,105 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (214 of 3,105 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (121 of 3,105 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (183 of 3,105 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.25 · 17.3% (538 of 3,105 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.47 · 2.5% (78 of 3,105 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (153 of 3,105 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.25 · 15.1% (469 of 3,105 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.26 · 13.0% (403 of 3,105 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (88 of 3,105 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (87 of 3,105 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.23 · 21.3% (662 of 3,105 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (106 of 3,105 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (80 of 3,105 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (104 of 3,105 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (103 of 3,105 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.21 · 21.4% (664 of 3,105 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 35.3% (1,096 of 3,105 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (148 of 3,105 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (310 of 3,105 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (107 of 3,105 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (108 of 3,105 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.36 · 2.9% (90 of 3,105 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.17 · 32.0% (995 of 3,105 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.15 · 42.4% (1,317 of 3,105 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty, from 3,105 real Commander decks.