Triton Tactics
Played in 286 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
1830+29+1+19+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (18)
- Geralf, Visionary Stitcher relevance 3.26 · 11.7% (56 of 477 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 1.42 · 6.0% (7 of 116 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 1.19 · 4.1% (6 of 148 decks)
- Tui and La, Moon and Ocean relevance 1.15 · 2.0% (10 of 510 decks)
- Master Pakku relevance 0.97 · 3.9% (4 of 102 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.78 · 3.1% (3 of 96 decks)
- Kaho, Minamo Historian relevance 0.78 · 1.5% (5 of 333 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.66 · 1.3% (4 of 310 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.66 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.63 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 0.60 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Ruric Thar, Biomagus relevance 0.48 · 1.5% (2 of 134 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.33 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 0.29 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Shore Up relevance 1.39 · 47.6% (136 of 286 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 1.07 · 29.7% (85 of 286 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.04 · 17.5% (50 of 286 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 1.03 · 30.8% (88 of 286 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 1.01 · 30.8% (88 of 286 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.93 · 21.0% (60 of 286 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.92 · 27.6% (79 of 286 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.92 · 17.8% (51 of 286 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 0.92 · 15.7% (45 of 286 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.90 · 26.6% (76 of 286 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (49 of 286 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (77 of 286 decks)
- Crenellated Wall relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (38 of 286 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.87 · 16.8% (48 of 286 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 0.84 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.80 · 22.7% (65 of 286 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.80 · 21.7% (62 of 286 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.80 · 13.6% (39 of 286 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 0.78 · 19.6% (56 of 286 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (35 of 286 decks)
- Vault Skyward relevance 0.77 · 11.2% (32 of 286 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.77 · 19.2% (55 of 286 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (63 of 286 decks)
- Profaner of the Dead relevance 0.73 · 12.2% (35 of 286 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.73 · 18.9% (54 of 286 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.72 · 18.2% (52 of 286 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (59 of 286 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.69 · 13.6% (39 of 286 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 0.67 · 12.2% (35 of 286 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.04 · 17.5% (50 of 286 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.92 · 17.8% (51 of 286 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 0.92 · 15.7% (45 of 286 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 0.88 · 17.1% (49 of 286 decks)
- Crenellated Wall relevance 0.87 · 13.3% (38 of 286 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 0.87 · 16.8% (48 of 286 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 0.84 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.80 · 22.7% (65 of 286 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.80 · 21.7% (62 of 286 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.80 · 13.6% (39 of 286 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 0.78 · 19.6% (56 of 286 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (35 of 286 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (63 of 286 decks)
- Profaner of the Dead relevance 0.73 · 12.2% (35 of 286 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.73 · 18.9% (54 of 286 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.72 · 18.2% (52 of 286 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.69 · 13.6% (39 of 286 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 0.67 · 12.2% (35 of 286 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 0.62 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Cleaver Skaab relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Gleaming Barrier relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (29 of 286 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.52 · 8.0% (23 of 286 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (26 of 286 decks)
- Biolume Egg // Biolume Serpent relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Wall of Mist relevance 0.46 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.45 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Steel Wall relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.43 · 9.8% (28 of 286 decks)
- Kraken Hatchling relevance 0.43 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Slagwurm Armor relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
All instants (19)
- Shore Up relevance 1.39 · 47.6% (136 of 286 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 1.07 · 29.7% (85 of 286 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 1.03 · 30.8% (88 of 286 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 1.01 · 30.8% (88 of 286 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.93 · 21.0% (60 of 286 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.92 · 27.6% (79 of 286 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.90 · 26.6% (76 of 286 decks)
- Vault Skyward relevance 0.77 · 11.2% (32 of 286 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.77 · 19.2% (55 of 286 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.72 · 20.6% (59 of 286 decks)
- Fleeting Reflection relevance 0.63 · 12.9% (37 of 286 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.57 · 16.4% (47 of 286 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (32 of 286 decks)
- Chain Stasis relevance 0.50 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Ray of Command relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (23 of 286 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.45 · 12.2% (35 of 286 decks)
- Shell Shield relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (22 of 286 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (77 of 286 decks)
EDH data for Triton Tactics: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 286 real decks.




























































