Hieroglyphic Illumination
Played in 112 Simic decks
330+9+3+19+9+6+4+
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Simic
Commanders
Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 5.3% of decks
Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 5.3% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 3.6% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 3.6% of decks
Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor 1.6% of decks
Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor 1.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Boon of the Wish-Giver 16.1% of decks
Boon of the Wish-Giver 16.1% of decks
Behold the Multiverse 20.5% of decks
Behold the Multiverse 20.5% of decks
Migration Path 23.2% of decks
Migration Path 23.2% of decks
Spring // Mind 14.3% of decks
Spring // Mind 14.3% of decks
Search for Tomorrow 19.6% of decks
Search for Tomorrow 19.6% of decks
Krosan Tusker 10.7% of decks
Krosan Tusker 10.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.97 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.46 · 1.6% (1 of 63 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.03 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.99 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.84 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.77 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.70 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.69 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.67 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.59 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.56 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.55 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.55 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 0.54 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.52 · 33.0% (37 of 112 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.51 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.49 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.47 · 26.8% (30 of 112 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.44 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.69 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.55 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 0.54 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (9 of 112 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.44 · 7.1% (8 of 112 decks)
All instants (19)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.99 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.77 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.67 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.55 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.52 · 33.0% (37 of 112 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.51 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.49 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.44 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.44 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.43 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.42 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.03 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.84 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.70 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.59 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.56 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.47 · 26.8% (30 of 112 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.73 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (11 of 112 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.46 · 8.9% (10 of 112 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.43 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
All lands (4)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.73 · 22.3% (25 of 112 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.73 · 27.7% (31 of 112 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.62 · 38.4% (43 of 112 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.51 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
EDH data for Hieroglyphic Illumination: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 112 real decks.















































