Moss Monster
Played in 31 Green decks
330+45+3+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
27.9% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
Enormous Baloth 58.1% of decks
Enormous Baloth 58.1% of decks
Colossapede 51.6% of decks
Colossapede 51.6% of decks
Ancient Brontodon 64.5% of decks
Ancient Brontodon 64.5% of decks
Cowl Prowler 51.6% of decks
Cowl Prowler 51.6% of decks
Alpha Tyrranax 45.2% of decks
Alpha Tyrranax 45.2% of decks
Gnarled Mass 45.2% of decks
Gnarled Mass 45.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.32 · 1.1% (17 of 1,565 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.89 · 4.1% (5 of 121 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.57 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 3.65 · 58.1% (18 of 31 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 3.28 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 3.23 · 64.5% (20 of 31 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 3.21 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 3.05 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 3.02 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.93 · 58.1% (18 of 31 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.91 · 77.4% (24 of 31 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.91 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 2.81 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 2.78 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.75 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 2.74 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.73 · 54.8% (17 of 31 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.71 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.68 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.68 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.62 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 2.60 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.59 · 54.8% (17 of 31 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.57 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 2.48 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 2.38 · 67.7% (21 of 31 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 2.33 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.29 · 67.7% (21 of 31 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 2.25 · 61.3% (19 of 31 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.24 · 61.3% (19 of 31 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.19 · 77.4% (24 of 31 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 2.17 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.16 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 3.65 · 58.1% (18 of 31 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 3.28 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 3.23 · 64.5% (20 of 31 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 3.21 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 3.05 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 3.02 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.93 · 58.1% (18 of 31 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.91 · 77.4% (24 of 31 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.91 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 2.81 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 2.78 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.75 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 2.74 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.73 · 54.8% (17 of 31 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 2.71 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 2.68 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 2.68 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.62 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 2.60 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.59 · 54.8% (17 of 31 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 2.57 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 2.48 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 2.38 · 67.7% (21 of 31 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 2.33 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.29 · 67.7% (21 of 31 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 2.25 · 61.3% (19 of 31 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.24 · 61.3% (19 of 31 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.19 · 77.4% (24 of 31 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 2.17 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.16 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.16 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.15 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.14 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.04 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Vastwood Gorger relevance 1.99 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.91 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 1.89 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.86 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 1.80 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 1.66 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Forest Bear relevance 1.59 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.47 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.37 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Golden Bear relevance 1.34 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Ordinary Bear relevance 0.97 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.71 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.66 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.62 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
All instants (1)
- Fog relevance 0.62 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.46 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
EDH data for Moss Monster: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 31 real decks.

























