Predict
Played in 58 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
230+7+4+3+15+13+4+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Gwendlyn Di Corci relevance 1.14 · 1.5% (3 of 195 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.98 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Doomsday relevance 1.43 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 1.23 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 1.10 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.03 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.90 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Street Wraith relevance 0.88 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.87 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.87 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.77 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.72 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.72 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.69 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.68 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.66 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.66 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.65 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.61 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.57 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.56 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Mysidian Elder relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.55 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Reiterate relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.54 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.53 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 1.23 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Street Wraith relevance 0.88 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.72 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.66 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 0.57 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Mysidian Elder relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.53 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.69 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.68 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.65 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.50 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
All instants (15)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.03 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.77 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.72 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.61 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.57 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Galvanic Iteration relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.55 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Reiterate relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.54 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.53 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.53 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.52 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.49 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Doomsday relevance 1.43 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 1.10 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.90 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.87 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.87 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.66 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.56 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.52 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.50 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Twinflame relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.75 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.63 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
All lands (4)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.65 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.54 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.50 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.50 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
EDH data for Predict: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 58 real decks.





















































