Predict
Played in 283 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (20)
- Gustha Ebbasdotter relevance 2.70 · 18.2% (20 of 110 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 1.25 · 1.3% (21 of 1,648 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 1.01 · 1.1% (13 of 1,160 decks)
- Unesh, Criosphinx Sovereign relevance 0.96 · 1.1% (11 of 964 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.91 · 1.2% (9 of 745 decks)
- Emperor Mihail II relevance 0.81 · 1.4% (6 of 437 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.78 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.74 · 1.3% (5 of 373 decks)
- Vendilion Clique relevance 0.58 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 0.54 · 1.1% (3 of 262 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.52 · 1.9% (2 of 107 decks)
- Helmut Zemo, Mastermind relevance 0.50 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Rayne, Academy Chancellor relevance 0.43 · 1.2% (2 of 170 decks)
- Madame Web, Clairvoyant relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Yuriko, Hope from the Shadows relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- The Lunar Whale relevance 0.33 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.28 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 0.26 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
- Stitcher Geralf relevance 0.25 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.79 · 27.2% (77 of 283 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (61 of 283 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.75 · 15.9% (45 of 283 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (58 of 283 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.71 · 18.0% (51 of 283 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.70 · 36.0% (102 of 283 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.69 · 45.9% (130 of 283 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (41 of 283 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.62 · 23.7% (67 of 283 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.60 · 38.9% (110 of 283 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.58 · 43.8% (124 of 283 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.57 · 17.7% (50 of 283 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.57 · 20.8% (59 of 283 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (43 of 283 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.52 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (32 of 283 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.50 · 21.6% (61 of 283 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (30 of 283 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.45 · 13.1% (37 of 283 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.45 · 15.9% (45 of 283 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.44 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (23 of 283 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (38 of 283 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (22 of 283 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.43 · 17.7% (50 of 283 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.42 · 10.6% (30 of 283 decks)
All creatures (1)
- Dakra Mystic relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (19 of 283 decks)
All artifacts (7)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (23 of 283 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (22 of 283 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.42 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.37 · 21.9% (62 of 283 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.36 · 18.4% (52 of 283 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (25 of 283 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (43 of 283 decks)
All instants (24)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.79 · 27.2% (77 of 283 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (61 of 283 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.75 · 15.9% (45 of 283 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (58 of 283 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.71 · 18.0% (51 of 283 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.70 · 36.0% (102 of 283 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.69 · 45.9% (130 of 283 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.57 · 17.7% (50 of 283 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.57 · 20.8% (59 of 283 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.52 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (32 of 283 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (30 of 283 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.45 · 15.9% (45 of 283 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (28 of 283 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.44 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.43 · 13.4% (38 of 283 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.42 · 10.6% (30 of 283 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.42 · 11.3% (32 of 283 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.41 · 25.1% (71 of 283 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.41 · 10.2% (29 of 283 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.41 · 11.0% (31 of 283 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.40 · 26.9% (76 of 283 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.38 · 19.4% (55 of 283 decks)
- Ray of Erasure relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (17 of 283 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Portent relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (41 of 283 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.62 · 23.7% (67 of 283 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.60 · 38.9% (110 of 283 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.58 · 43.8% (124 of 283 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.50 · 21.6% (61 of 283 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.45 · 13.1% (37 of 283 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (40 of 283 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.43 · 17.7% (50 of 283 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.40 · 10.2% (29 of 283 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.40 · 15.2% (43 of 283 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.36 · 9.5% (27 of 283 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.59 · 28.3% (80 of 283 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.54 · 21.2% (60 of 283 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (44 of 283 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.38 · 12.7% (36 of 283 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (20 of 283 decks)
EDH data for Predict: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 283 real decks.