Cards like Consider
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Enter the Enigma
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Enter the Enigma 62%
- Slip Through Space 54%
- Pym Particles 31%
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Pongify
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 77%
- Rapid Hybridization 69%
Cards like Preordain
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 54%
- Serum Visions 46%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Aqueous Form
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 46%
- Security Bypass 38%
Cards like Stock Up
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards like Thunderclap Drake
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Wizards of Thay
Cards like Temporal Manipulation
9.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Time Stretch
Cards like Proft's Eidetic Memory
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Magic Damper
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Magic Damper 23%
- Dive Down 15%
- Mizzium Skin 8%
- You See a Guard Approach 8%
- Chase Inspiration 8%
- Shore Up 8%
Other options: Glint, Octopus Form, Shell Shield
Cards like Cryptic Command
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Scour
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Fading Hope
8.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fading Hope 15%
- Drag Under 8%
- Unsubstantiate 8%
Other options: Voyage's End, String of Disappearances, Galestrike, Stern Dismissal, Force Away, Repulse, Unsummon, Consuming Vortex, Ice Magic, Drown in Shapelessness, Symbol of Unsummoning, Arrester's Admonition, Select for Inspection, Escape Detection
Cards like Flow of Knowledge
7.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flow of Knowledge 38%
- Flow of Ideas 23%
Cards like Fabricate
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 23%
- Scour for Scrap 15%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 62%
- Lightning Greaves 31%
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other blue decks
Cards like Champion's Helm
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards like Runechanter's Pike
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Runechanter's Pike 38%
- Glamdring 15%
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 77%
- Negate 38%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Fact or Fiction
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Truth or Tale, Epiphany at the Drownyard, Riddles in the Dark
Cards like Bribery
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Sword of Feast and Famine
7.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Vnwxt, Verbose Host
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan, Triskaidekaphile
Cards like Thirst for Discovery
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Thirst for Identity, Thirst for Meaning
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards like Decanter of Endless Water
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.63 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.26 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.24 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.24 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.20 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.20 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Runechanter's Pike relevance 0.24 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.23 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.22 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.17 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.15 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.15 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.17 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.12 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Psionic Blast relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.16 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.12 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.12 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 0.15 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Demilich relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.10 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Asinine Antics relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.15 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Talent of the Telepath relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.13 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.12 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.20 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.12 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.12 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 0.15 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Demilich relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Docent of Perfection // Final Iteration relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Niblis of Frost relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 0.11 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Laboratory Drudge relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.10 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.09 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.10 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.10 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Chrome Host Seedshark relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- The Lord of the Eagles relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Vodalian Arcanist relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Wingblade Disciple relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Muse Seeker relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Bilbo, Thief in the Night relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.09 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.08 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Amphin Mutineer relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.07 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Namor the Sub-Mariner relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.08 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.24 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Runechanter's Pike relevance 0.24 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Glamdring, Foe-hammer // Gleam of Death relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.17 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Glamdring relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.08 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Psychic Paper relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Wrecking Ball Arm relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Zephyr Boots relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Blue Mage's Cane relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.08 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Starting Column relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Silver Shroud Costume relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.06 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.07 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.06 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.06 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.06 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.04 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.03 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All enchantments (21)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.22 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.15 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.15 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.08 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.08 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.06 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Uncover the Moon-Letters relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Secrets of the Dead relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.07 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.04 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.02 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.20 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.23 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.12 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Psionic Blast relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.10 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.08 · 84.6% (11 of 13 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.12 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.12 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.12 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.12 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.10 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.10 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Fortune's Favor relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.08 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.11 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.08 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.11 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.09 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.07 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.06 · 76.9% (10 of 13 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Meddle relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.09 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Predict relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.10 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Serpentine Ambush relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Unfathomable Truths relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.09 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Aethersnatch relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Plunder the Trollshaws relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Fleeting Reflection relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Chase Inspiration relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.09 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.05 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.08 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Vision Skeins relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Supreme Will relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.26 · 69.2% (9 of 13 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.24 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.21 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.17 · 61.5% (8 of 13 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.18 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.19 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.16 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.16 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.15 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Asinine Antics relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.15 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Talent of the Telepath relevance 0.16 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.14 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.13 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.12 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.15 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Glimpse the Future relevance 0.16 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.13 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.09 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Captivating Gyre relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.11 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.13 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Covenant of Minds relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Extract Power relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.09 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Telemin Performance relevance 0.13 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Expanded Anatomy relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.11 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Abstract Performance relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.10 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.07 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 0.11 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.09 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.10 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.09 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.08 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All utility lands (20)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Villainous Hideout relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.09 · 38.5% (5 of 13 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.07 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.07 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.06 · 30.8% (4 of 13 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.06 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.07 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 53.8% (7 of 13 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.06 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.04 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.04 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.04 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.04 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.04 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (7)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.12 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.10 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.07 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.06 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.05 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 84.6% (11 of 13 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Helmut Zemo, Mastermind, from 13 real Commander decks.