Slimebind
Played in 88 Simic decks
530+29+2+9+6+4+
Color Identity Spread
21.3% Simic
Commanders
Eutropia the Twice-Favored 3.5% of decks
Eutropia the Twice-Favored 3.5% of decks
Experiment Kraj 1.4% of decks
Experiment Kraj 1.4% of decks
Legolas, Counter of Kills 2.9% of decks
Legolas, Counter of Kills 2.9% of decks
Zegana, Utopian Speaker 3.6% of decks
Zegana, Utopian Speaker 3.6% of decks
It Came from Planet Glurg 2.5% of decks
It Came from Planet Glurg 2.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Ravenous Slime 36.4% of decks
Ravenous Slime 36.4% of decks
Biogenic Ooze 43.2% of decks
Biogenic Ooze 43.2% of decks
Experiment One 38.6% of decks
Experiment One 38.6% of decks
Oran-Rief Ooze 34.1% of decks
Oran-Rief Ooze 34.1% of decks
Predator Ooze 35.2% of decks
Predator Ooze 35.2% of decks
Aeve, Progenitor Ooze 34.1% of decks
Aeve, Progenitor Ooze 34.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Eutropia the Twice-Favored relevance 2.11 · 3.5% (11 of 317 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 1.69 · 1.4% (11 of 775 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 1.59 · 2.9% (6 of 206 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 1.19 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- It Came from Planet Glurg relevance 1.09 · 2.5% (3 of 122 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ravenous Slime relevance 2.26 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Biogenic Ooze relevance 2.20 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 2.06 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 1.95 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 1.88 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 1.83 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Mitotic Slime relevance 1.83 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Ooze Flux relevance 1.82 · 28.4% (25 of 88 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 1.70 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.66 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Mystic Genesis relevance 1.62 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 1.55 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Consuming Blob relevance 1.55 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 1.48 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 1.46 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 1.42 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 1.38 · 42.0% (37 of 88 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 1.28 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 1.15 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 1.14 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 1.12 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Printlifter Ooze relevance 1.08 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 0.90 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.87 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.81 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Iceridge Serpent relevance 0.81 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.79 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Ravenous Slime relevance 2.26 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Biogenic Ooze relevance 2.20 · 43.2% (38 of 88 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 2.06 · 38.6% (34 of 88 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 1.95 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Predator Ooze relevance 1.88 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 1.83 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Mitotic Slime relevance 1.83 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 1.70 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.66 · 27.3% (24 of 88 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 1.55 · 36.4% (32 of 88 decks)
- Consuming Blob relevance 1.55 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 1.46 · 29.5% (26 of 88 decks)
- Ochre Jelly relevance 1.42 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 1.28 · 31.8% (28 of 88 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 1.14 · 35.2% (31 of 88 decks)
- Printlifter Ooze relevance 1.08 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 0.90 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.81 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Iceridge Serpent relevance 0.81 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.79 · 20.5% (18 of 88 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.78 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.75 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 0.74 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
- Shaper Apprentice relevance 0.74 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Sharktocrab relevance 0.72 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
- Vineshaper Mystic relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.70 · 10.2% (9 of 88 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.84 · 17.0% (15 of 88 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.74 · 18.2% (16 of 88 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Ooze Flux relevance 1.82 · 28.4% (25 of 88 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 1.15 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (22 of 88 decks)
- Blossombind relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.72 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.69 · 34.1% (30 of 88 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.69 · 12.5% (11 of 88 decks)
All instants (6)
- Mystic Genesis relevance 1.62 · 26.1% (23 of 88 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 1.38 · 42.0% (37 of 88 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 1.12 · 19.3% (17 of 88 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.87 · 22.7% (20 of 88 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.76 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Ooze Spill relevance 0.68 · 13.6% (12 of 88 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 1.48 · 30.7% (27 of 88 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (14 of 88 decks)
- Clutch of Currents relevance 0.78 · 11.4% (10 of 88 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.78 · 14.8% (13 of 88 decks)
EDH data for Slimebind: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 88 real decks.


































