Gaea's Will
Played in 220 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (7)
- Averna, the Chaos Bloom relevance 1.67 · 1.3% (38 of 3,001 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Ryan Sinclair relevance 1.05 · 2.0% (6 of 294 decks)
- The Tenth Doctor // Graham O'Brien relevance 0.84 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Graham O'Brien // The Ninth Doctor relevance 0.69 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Graham O'Brien // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.63 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Bill Potts // The Thirteenth Doctor relevance 0.59 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.58 · 1.9% (2 of 106 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 1.61 · 31.8% (70 of 220 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.31 · 26.4% (58 of 220 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 1.18 · 22.7% (50 of 220 decks)
- Crashing Footfalls relevance 1.12 · 16.8% (37 of 220 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.99 · 17.3% (38 of 220 decks)
- Throes of Chaos relevance 0.94 · 24.5% (54 of 220 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.93 · 35.0% (77 of 220 decks)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.92 · 24.1% (53 of 220 decks)
- Bigger on the Inside relevance 0.84 · 24.1% (53 of 220 decks)
- Volcanic Torrent relevance 0.82 · 21.8% (48 of 220 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.82 · 22.7% (50 of 220 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 0.80 · 22.3% (49 of 220 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.80 · 20.9% (46 of 220 decks)
- Wild-Magic Sorcerer relevance 0.77 · 22.7% (50 of 220 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.76 · 25.0% (55 of 220 decks)
- Wheel of Fate relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (33 of 220 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.76 · 20.0% (44 of 220 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 0.76 · 23.6% (52 of 220 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.73 · 12.3% (27 of 220 decks)
- Into the Time Vortex relevance 0.72 · 19.1% (42 of 220 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 28.6% (63 of 220 decks)
- Bloodbraid Challenger relevance 0.72 · 18.6% (41 of 220 decks)
- Etherium-Horn Sorcerer relevance 0.72 · 18.6% (41 of 220 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.72 · 17.7% (39 of 220 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.71 · 20.5% (45 of 220 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.67 · 15.0% (33 of 220 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.65 · 19.5% (43 of 220 decks)
- Dark Apostle relevance 0.64 · 12.3% (27 of 220 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 17.7% (39 of 220 decks)
- Glimpse of Tomorrow relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (20 of 220 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.92 · 24.1% (53 of 220 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.82 · 22.7% (50 of 220 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 0.80 · 22.3% (49 of 220 decks)
- Wild-Magic Sorcerer relevance 0.77 · 22.7% (50 of 220 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.76 · 25.0% (55 of 220 decks)
- Sakashima's Protege relevance 0.76 · 20.0% (44 of 220 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 0.76 · 23.6% (52 of 220 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 28.6% (63 of 220 decks)
- Bloodbraid Challenger relevance 0.72 · 18.6% (41 of 220 decks)
- Etherium-Horn Sorcerer relevance 0.72 · 18.6% (41 of 220 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.72 · 17.7% (39 of 220 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.71 · 20.5% (45 of 220 decks)
- Dark Apostle relevance 0.64 · 12.3% (27 of 220 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.64 · 17.7% (39 of 220 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.56 · 17.3% (38 of 220 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.56 · 20.5% (45 of 220 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (52 of 220 decks)
- Noise Marine relevance 0.56 · 12.7% (28 of 220 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (49 of 220 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.55 · 20.9% (46 of 220 decks)
- Heralds of Tzeentch relevance 0.53 · 11.8% (26 of 220 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.53 · 20.5% (45 of 220 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (30 of 220 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Sol Talisman relevance 1.18 · 22.7% (50 of 220 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.99 · 17.3% (38 of 220 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.73 · 12.3% (27 of 220 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.57 · 16.4% (36 of 220 decks)
- Meteoric Mace relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (24 of 220 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (26 of 220 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.93 · 35.0% (77 of 220 decks)
- Bigger on the Inside relevance 0.84 · 24.1% (53 of 220 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.65 · 19.5% (43 of 220 decks)
- The Lost and the Damned relevance 0.59 · 15.9% (35 of 220 decks)
All instants (3)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.80 · 20.9% (46 of 220 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.67 · 15.0% (33 of 220 decks)
- Violent Outburst relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (27 of 220 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 1.61 · 31.8% (70 of 220 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 1.31 · 26.4% (58 of 220 decks)
- Crashing Footfalls relevance 1.12 · 16.8% (37 of 220 decks)
- Throes of Chaos relevance 0.94 · 24.5% (54 of 220 decks)
- Volcanic Torrent relevance 0.82 · 21.8% (48 of 220 decks)
- Wheel of Fate relevance 0.76 · 15.0% (33 of 220 decks)
- Into the Time Vortex relevance 0.72 · 19.1% (42 of 220 decks)
- Glimpse of Tomorrow relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (20 of 220 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.58 · 15.9% (35 of 220 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.58 · 16.4% (36 of 220 decks)
All lands (4)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.63 · 27.7% (61 of 220 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.60 · 28.2% (62 of 220 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.57 · 28.2% (62 of 220 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.56 · 24.1% (53 of 220 decks)
EDH data for Gaea's Will: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 220 real decks.