Wall of Shards
Played in 323 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
4.4% Selesnya
All commanders (5)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 3.65 · 6.2% (246 of 3,954 decks)
- Elda, Conjurer of Spectacle relevance 1.30 · 1.2% (31 of 2,566 decks)
- Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Sir Shandlar of Eberyn relevance 0.39 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Rasaad yn Bashir relevance 0.31 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Flumph relevance 2.90 · 75.5% (244 of 323 decks)
- Master of Ceremonies relevance 2.46 · 62.5% (202 of 323 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 2.43 · 64.4% (208 of 323 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 2.42 · 62.8% (203 of 323 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 2.33 · 63.8% (206 of 323 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 2.30 · 60.7% (196 of 323 decks)
- Nils, Discipline Enforcer relevance 2.29 · 55.7% (180 of 323 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 2.25 · 51.1% (165 of 323 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 2.23 · 51.7% (167 of 323 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 2.22 · 56.0% (181 of 323 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 2.12 · 43.7% (141 of 323 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 2.09 · 45.2% (146 of 323 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 2.07 · 44.9% (145 of 323 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 2.01 · 41.8% (135 of 323 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 2.01 · 41.2% (133 of 323 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 1.99 · 58.5% (189 of 323 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 1.97 · 41.5% (134 of 323 decks)
- Noble Heritage relevance 1.96 · 50.5% (163 of 323 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 1.91 · 55.1% (178 of 323 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 1.89 · 46.1% (149 of 323 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 1.88 · 64.7% (209 of 323 decks)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 1.85 · 38.1% (123 of 323 decks)
- Arbiter of Knollridge relevance 1.79 · 31.9% (103 of 323 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 1.77 · 34.7% (112 of 323 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.74 · 35.6% (115 of 323 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 1.74 · 36.2% (117 of 323 decks)
- Skullwinder relevance 1.74 · 39.9% (129 of 323 decks)
- Yes Man, Personal Securitron relevance 1.72 · 36.2% (117 of 323 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 1.71 · 43.3% (140 of 323 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 1.65 · 44.3% (143 of 323 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Flumph relevance 2.90 · 75.5% (244 of 323 decks)
- Master of Ceremonies relevance 2.46 · 62.5% (202 of 323 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 2.42 · 62.8% (203 of 323 decks)
- Orzhov Advokist relevance 2.30 · 60.7% (196 of 323 decks)
- Nils, Discipline Enforcer relevance 2.29 · 55.7% (180 of 323 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 2.25 · 51.1% (165 of 323 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 2.09 · 45.2% (146 of 323 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 2.01 · 41.2% (133 of 323 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 1.88 · 64.7% (209 of 323 decks)
- Arbiter of Knollridge relevance 1.79 · 31.9% (103 of 323 decks)
- Skullwinder relevance 1.74 · 39.9% (129 of 323 decks)
- Yes Man, Personal Securitron relevance 1.72 · 36.2% (117 of 323 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 1.65 · 44.3% (143 of 323 decks)
- Dawnbreak Reclaimer relevance 1.61 · 28.8% (93 of 323 decks)
- Windborn Muse relevance 1.60 · 44.6% (144 of 323 decks)
- Generous Patron relevance 1.54 · 31.9% (103 of 323 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 1.47 · 30.0% (97 of 323 decks)
- Loran of the Third Path relevance 1.28 · 47.7% (154 of 323 decks)
- Sergeant John Benton relevance 1.28 · 29.7% (96 of 323 decks)
- Spurnmage Advocate relevance 1.27 · 21.7% (70 of 323 decks)
- Howling Golem relevance 1.23 · 23.2% (75 of 323 decks)
- Combat Calligrapher relevance 1.22 · 23.5% (76 of 323 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Howling Mine relevance 2.23 · 51.7% (167 of 323 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 2.22 · 56.0% (181 of 323 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 2.12 · 43.7% (141 of 323 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 1.97 · 41.5% (134 of 323 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 1.77 · 34.7% (112 of 323 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 1.74 · 36.2% (117 of 323 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 1.53 · 27.6% (89 of 323 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 1.46 · 27.6% (89 of 323 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 2.43 · 64.4% (208 of 323 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 2.01 · 41.8% (135 of 323 decks)
- Noble Heritage relevance 1.96 · 50.5% (163 of 323 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 1.89 · 46.1% (149 of 323 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 1.40 · 26.3% (85 of 323 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 1.23 · 23.5% (76 of 323 decks)
All instants (5)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 1.85 · 38.1% (123 of 323 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 1.71 · 43.3% (140 of 323 decks)
- Fog relevance 1.47 · 52.6% (170 of 323 decks)
- Riot Control relevance 1.29 · 35.9% (116 of 323 decks)
- Truce relevance 1.26 · 21.1% (68 of 323 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 2.33 · 63.8% (206 of 323 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 2.07 · 44.9% (145 of 323 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 1.99 · 58.5% (189 of 323 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 1.91 · 55.1% (178 of 323 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 1.74 · 35.6% (115 of 323 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 1.52 · 40.6% (131 of 323 decks)
- Jailbreak relevance 1.52 · 28.2% (91 of 323 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 1.69 · 36.5% (118 of 323 decks)
All lands (1)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 1.24 · 25.7% (83 of 323 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Shards: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 323 real decks.