Wall of Shards
Played in 153 Esper decks
230+22+4+7+5+1+1+10+
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Esper
Commanders
Most Relevant
Wall of Denial 31.4% of decks
Wall of Denial 31.4% of decks
Tainted Remedy 22.9% of decks
Tainted Remedy 22.9% of decks
Benevolent Offering 14.4% of decks
Benevolent Offering 14.4% of decks
Tree of Perdition 16.3% of decks
Tree of Perdition 16.3% of decks
Condemn 15.7% of decks
Condemn 15.7% of decks
Congregate 13.7% of decks
Congregate 13.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Bane, Lord of Darkness relevance 2.67 · 3.0% (34 of 1,151 decks)
- Lady Evangela relevance 0.41 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.89 · 31.4% (48 of 153 decks)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 1.23 · 22.9% (35 of 153 decks)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 0.99 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 0.94 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.92 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Congregate relevance 0.87 · 13.7% (21 of 153 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.79 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.75 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 0.68 · 11.1% (17 of 153 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 0.68 · 13.1% (20 of 153 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.66 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 0.63 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.60 · 13.7% (21 of 153 decks)
- Drivnod, Carnage Dominus relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.55 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (16 of 153 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (12 of 153 decks)
- Vizkopa Guildmage relevance 0.51 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Mister Negative relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (13 of 153 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 13.7% (21 of 153 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (17 of 153 decks)
- Wall of Reverence relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (13 of 153 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.89 · 31.4% (48 of 153 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 0.94 · 16.3% (25 of 153 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.79 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 0.68 · 13.1% (20 of 153 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.66 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 0.63 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Drivnod, Carnage Dominus relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.55 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.54 · 10.5% (16 of 153 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (12 of 153 decks)
- Vizkopa Guildmage relevance 0.51 · 11.8% (18 of 153 decks)
- Mister Negative relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (13 of 153 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.47 · 13.7% (21 of 153 decks)
- Wall of Reverence relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (13 of 153 decks)
- Teysa Karlov relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (15 of 153 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (13 of 153 decks)
- Nyx-Fleece Ram relevance 0.41 · 7.2% (11 of 153 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.75 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (12 of 153 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.41 · 28.8% (44 of 153 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 1.23 · 22.9% (35 of 153 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 0.68 · 11.1% (17 of 153 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.46 · 11.1% (17 of 153 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Greater Auramancy relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (19 of 153 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.42 · 19.6% (30 of 153 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.41 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
All instants (5)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 0.99 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.92 · 15.7% (24 of 153 decks)
- Congregate relevance 0.87 · 13.7% (21 of 153 decks)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (23 of 153 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.60 · 13.7% (21 of 153 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Search for Glory relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (10 of 153 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (28 of 153 decks)
All lands (10)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.83 · 14.4% (22 of 153 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.53 · 13.7% (21 of 153 decks)
- Boreal Shelf relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (12 of 153 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (20 of 153 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.50 · 13.1% (20 of 153 decks)
- Shimmerdrift Vale relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (11 of 153 decks)
- Glacial Floodplain relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (14 of 153 decks)
- Ice Tunnel relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (13 of 153 decks)
- Snowfield Sinkhole relevance 0.42 · 8.5% (13 of 153 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.40 · 17.0% (26 of 153 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Shards: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 153 real decks.














































