Charge of the Forever-Beast
Played in 105 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (5)
- Timmy, Power Gamer relevance 0.93 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.67 · 1.3% (2 of 151 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.54 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.46 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Devil Dinosaur relevance 0.40 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.65 · 12.4% (13 of 105 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.60 · 17.1% (18 of 105 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.59 · 18.1% (19 of 105 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.58 · 16.2% (17 of 105 decks)
- Coordinated Clobbering relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.56 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.55 · 28.6% (30 of 105 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.53 · 13.3% (14 of 105 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.53 · 14.3% (15 of 105 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.52 · 27.6% (29 of 105 decks)
- Grazing Whiptail relevance 0.52 · 7.6% (8 of 105 decks)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (9 of 105 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.52 · 22.9% (24 of 105 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.51 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Arborback Stomper relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (8 of 105 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (20 of 105 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
- Monstrous Emergence relevance 0.50 · 9.5% (10 of 105 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.50 · 13.3% (14 of 105 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (14 of 105 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (10 of 105 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.48 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 0.48 · 8.6% (9 of 105 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.47 · 9.5% (10 of 105 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.47 · 16.2% (17 of 105 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.65 · 12.4% (13 of 105 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.60 · 17.1% (18 of 105 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.58 · 16.2% (17 of 105 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.56 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.55 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.55 · 28.6% (30 of 105 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.53 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.52 · 27.6% (29 of 105 decks)
- Grazing Whiptail relevance 0.52 · 7.6% (8 of 105 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.51 · 15.2% (16 of 105 decks)
- Arborback Stomper relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (8 of 105 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (20 of 105 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.50 · 13.3% (14 of 105 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.49 · 13.3% (14 of 105 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (10 of 105 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.48 · 20.0% (21 of 105 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.47 · 16.2% (17 of 105 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (13 of 105 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.46 · 14.3% (15 of 105 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 0.45 · 14.3% (15 of 105 decks)
- Regal Imperiosaur relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
- Raucous Audience relevance 0.44 · 12.4% (13 of 105 decks)
- Curious Altisaur relevance 0.43 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.42 · 19.0% (20 of 105 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.52 · 22.9% (24 of 105 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
- Karametra's Favor relevance 0.47 · 7.6% (8 of 105 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.44 · 12.4% (13 of 105 decks)
All instants (5)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.53 · 14.3% (15 of 105 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 0.48 · 8.6% (9 of 105 decks)
- Thwart the Enemy relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (9 of 105 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.45 · 17.1% (18 of 105 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (15 of 105 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Migration Path relevance 0.59 · 18.1% (19 of 105 decks)
- Coordinated Clobbering relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (9 of 105 decks)
- Monstrous Emergence relevance 0.50 · 9.5% (10 of 105 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.47 · 9.5% (10 of 105 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
All planeswalkers (3)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.53 · 13.3% (14 of 105 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (11 of 105 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.44 · 17.1% (18 of 105 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.42 · 18.1% (19 of 105 decks)
All lands (1)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.46 · 11.4% (12 of 105 decks)
EDH data for Charge of the Forever-Beast: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 105 real decks.