Condescend
Played in 1,475 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
8.9% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 3.75 · 33.7% (211 of 627 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 3.43 · 26.8% (181 of 675 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 2.44 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 1.98 · 5.5% (178 of 3,219 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.93 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 1.45 · 3.4% (118 of 3,499 decks)
- Proft, Consulting Detective relevance 1.37 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 1.27 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.84 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.84 · 2.3% (29 of 1,273 decks)
- Grandmother Goby relevance 0.82 · 3.2% (15 of 469 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.75 · 1.2% (92 of 7,795 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Gustha Ebbasdotter relevance 0.60 · 4.2% (5 of 120 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.56 · 3.6% (5 of 140 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.55 · 2.6% (7 of 267 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.52 · 3.8% (4 of 106 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.51 · 1.4% (14 of 971 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.48 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Richard Garfield, Ph.D. relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (2 of 36 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 0.42 · 1.4% (9 of 664 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (6 of 385 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (2 of 47 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.36 · 1.0% (10 of 964 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 0.35 · 1.3% (6 of 449 decks)
- Alhammarret, High Arbiter relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (8 of 768 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dissolve relevance 1.25 · 31.5% (465 of 1,475 decks)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 1.00 · 18.1% (267 of 1,475 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.99 · 24.7% (365 of 1,475 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.99 · 19.3% (285 of 1,475 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.95 · 36.4% (537 of 1,475 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.84 · 23.7% (350 of 1,475 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 0.84 · 16.9% (249 of 1,475 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (206 of 1,475 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 0.74 · 16.1% (238 of 1,475 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.73 · 14.1% (208 of 1,475 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.71 · 14.4% (212 of 1,475 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.70 · 20.7% (306 of 1,475 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.68 · 12.9% (190 of 1,475 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.68 · 13.6% (201 of 1,475 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.67 · 16.3% (241 of 1,475 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.66 · 43.9% (648 of 1,475 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (172 of 1,475 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.65 · 22.4% (331 of 1,475 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.65 · 42.0% (620 of 1,475 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.64 · 14.9% (220 of 1,475 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.63 · 17.8% (263 of 1,475 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.63 · 11.6% (171 of 1,475 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (200 of 1,475 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.61 · 11.0% (162 of 1,475 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.60 · 15.1% (223 of 1,475 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (206 of 1,475 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.57 · 18.3% (270 of 1,475 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (225 of 1,475 decks)
- Memory Drain relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (141 of 1,475 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.55 · 25.0% (369 of 1,475 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 1.00 · 18.1% (267 of 1,475 decks)
- Augury Owl relevance 0.84 · 16.9% (249 of 1,475 decks)
- Sphinx of Foresight relevance 0.74 · 16.1% (238 of 1,475 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.73 · 14.1% (208 of 1,475 decks)
- Faerie Seer relevance 0.70 · 20.7% (306 of 1,475 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 0.68 · 13.6% (201 of 1,475 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.63 · 17.8% (263 of 1,475 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.55 · 25.0% (369 of 1,475 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (138 of 1,475 decks)
- Warden of Evos Isle relevance 0.53 · 12.6% (186 of 1,475 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.52 · 22.0% (325 of 1,475 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.51 · 13.8% (203 of 1,475 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (178 of 1,475 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.50 · 30.8% (454 of 1,475 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (172 of 1,475 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.84 · 23.7% (350 of 1,475 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (136 of 1,475 decks)
All instants (21)
- Dissolve relevance 1.25 · 31.5% (465 of 1,475 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.99 · 24.7% (365 of 1,475 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (206 of 1,475 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.67 · 16.3% (241 of 1,475 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.66 · 43.9% (648 of 1,475 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.65 · 22.4% (331 of 1,475 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.64 · 14.9% (220 of 1,475 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.63 · 11.6% (171 of 1,475 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (200 of 1,475 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.60 · 15.1% (223 of 1,475 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.59 · 14.0% (206 of 1,475 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.57 · 18.3% (270 of 1,475 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (225 of 1,475 decks)
- Memory Drain relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (141 of 1,475 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.52 · 21.7% (320 of 1,475 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.51 · 15.6% (230 of 1,475 decks)
- Voyage's End relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (135 of 1,475 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.50 · 22.6% (334 of 1,475 decks)
- Select for Inspection relevance 0.49 · 8.2% (121 of 1,475 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (165 of 1,475 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.47 · 12.3% (181 of 1,475 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.99 · 19.3% (285 of 1,475 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.95 · 36.4% (537 of 1,475 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.71 · 14.4% (212 of 1,475 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.68 · 12.9% (190 of 1,475 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.65 · 42.0% (620 of 1,475 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.61 · 11.0% (162 of 1,475 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.51 · 11.4% (168 of 1,475 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.81 · 17.4% (257 of 1,475 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.73 · 15.5% (229 of 1,475 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.72 · 14.1% (208 of 1,475 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.62 · 24.8% (366 of 1,475 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.61 · 31.2% (460 of 1,475 decks)
EDH data for Condescend: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,475 real decks.