Prosperous Pirates
Played in 85 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3.8% Simic
- Izzet 588 · 26.1%
- Grixis 474 · 21.0%
- Azorius 363 · 16.1%
- Dimir 249 · 11.0%
- Blue 196 · 8.7%
- Simic 85 · 3.8%
- Temur 68 · 3.0%
- Other (14) 233 · 10.3%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 1.84 · 1.0% (18 of 1,782 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 1.29 · 5.3% (3 of 57 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 1.03 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 1.03 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 1.00 · 24.7% (21 of 85 decks)
- Kozilek's Predator relevance 1.00 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.95 · 29.4% (25 of 85 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.80 · 34.1% (29 of 85 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 0.71 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Deep Forest Hermit relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.68 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.67 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.64 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.63 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.63 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- City of Death relevance 0.62 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.61 · 21.2% (18 of 85 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.59 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.59 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.56 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 27.1% (23 of 85 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.54 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.53 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.51 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.49 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 1.00 · 24.7% (21 of 85 decks)
- Kozilek's Predator relevance 1.00 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.95 · 29.4% (25 of 85 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.80 · 34.1% (29 of 85 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 0.71 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Deep Forest Hermit relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.68 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.63 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.59 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.59 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Owlbear relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.56 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 27.1% (23 of 85 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.53 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.51 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.49 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.46 · 15.3% (13 of 85 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.45 · 21.2% (18 of 85 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.45 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Gruff Triplets relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.67 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.64 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.63 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.61 · 21.2% (18 of 85 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.53 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- City of Death relevance 0.62 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
All instants (4)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.54 · 18.8% (16 of 85 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.51 · 11.8% (10 of 85 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.49 · 17.6% (15 of 85 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.46 · 16.5% (14 of 85 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.48 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (8 of 85 decks)
All lands (3)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.63 · 31.8% (27 of 85 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (19 of 85 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.46 · 14.1% (12 of 85 decks)
EDH data for Prosperous Pirates: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 85 real decks.