Constricting Tendrils
Played in 59 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
26.9% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Wasp, Shrinking Savior relevance 0.97 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.95 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 0.74 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Startling Development relevance 1.98 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Dazzling Lights relevance 1.75 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.74 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.62 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.54 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 1.53 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.48 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Rescind relevance 1.40 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 1.32 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Choking Tethers relevance 1.24 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Scrounging Skyray relevance 1.17 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Trade the Helm relevance 1.15 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 1.15 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 1.14 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 1.09 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.09 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 1.06 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 1.05 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Mage's Guile relevance 1.00 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.92 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.89 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.86 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.81 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.76 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.75 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.73 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.71 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Scrounging Skyray relevance 1.17 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.09 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.78 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.51 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.37 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.62 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
All instants (32)
- Startling Development relevance 1.98 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Dazzling Lights relevance 1.75 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.74 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.62 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 1.53 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.48 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Rescind relevance 1.40 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Choking Tethers relevance 1.24 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 1.15 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 1.14 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 1.06 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 1.05 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Mage's Guile relevance 1.00 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.92 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.86 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.81 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.76 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.75 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.75 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.74 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 0.71 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.71 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Gigadrowse relevance 0.57 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.56 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.56 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.55 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.52 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.50 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.45 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.40 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.54 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 1.32 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Trade the Helm relevance 1.15 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Stall Out relevance 1.09 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.89 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.73 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.56 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.53 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.53 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
EDH data for Constricting Tendrils: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 59 real decks.