Constricting Tendrils
Played in 62 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
28.3% Azorius
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.28 · 62.9% (39 of 62 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.17 · 62.9% (39 of 62 decks)
- Complicate relevance 4.12 · 62.9% (39 of 62 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.02 · 61.3% (38 of 62 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.01 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.98 · 66.1% (41 of 62 decks)
- Court Homunculus relevance 3.96 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 3.92 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 3.82 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Curfew relevance 3.79 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Djeru's Renunciation relevance 3.77 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Catalog relevance 3.76 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 3.76 · 59.7% (37 of 62 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.74 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 3.72 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Djeru's Resolve relevance 3.70 · 61.3% (38 of 62 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 3.69 · 61.3% (38 of 62 decks)
- Cowed by Wisdom relevance 3.66 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 3.63 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 3.61 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 3.58 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 3.58 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 3.57 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 3.56 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.55 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 3.55 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 3.55 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 3.54 · 59.7% (37 of 62 decks)
- Censor relevance 3.53 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Collector's Case relevance 3.53 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Court Homunculus relevance 3.96 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 3.72 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 3.61 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 3.55 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 3.55 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 3.52 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Air Elemental relevance 3.45 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.45 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 3.43 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 3.42 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Alchemist's Apprentice relevance 3.42 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 3.40 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Ascendant Spirit relevance 3.37 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 3.37 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Collector's Case relevance 3.53 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Compulsion relevance 3.76 · 59.7% (37 of 62 decks)
- Cowed by Wisdom relevance 3.66 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 3.57 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 3.38 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Deep Freeze relevance 3.37 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
All instants (24)
- Contradict relevance 4.17 · 62.9% (39 of 62 decks)
- Complicate relevance 4.12 · 62.9% (39 of 62 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 3.98 · 66.1% (41 of 62 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 3.92 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Curfew relevance 3.79 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Djeru's Renunciation relevance 3.77 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Catalog relevance 3.76 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.74 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Djeru's Resolve relevance 3.70 · 61.3% (38 of 62 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 3.69 · 61.3% (38 of 62 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 3.58 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 3.58 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 3.56 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Countermand relevance 3.55 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Censor relevance 3.53 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Aerial Formation relevance 3.51 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 3.49 · 53.2% (33 of 62 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 3.48 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 3.47 · 54.8% (34 of 62 decks)
- Bandage relevance 3.47 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 3.46 · 51.6% (32 of 62 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 3.41 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 3.40 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Choking Tethers relevance 3.39 · 61.3% (38 of 62 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Compelling Argument relevance 4.28 · 62.9% (39 of 62 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 4.02 · 61.3% (38 of 62 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 4.01 · 58.1% (36 of 62 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 3.82 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 3.63 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 3.54 · 59.7% (37 of 62 decks)
EDH data for Constricting Tendrils: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 62 real decks.