Colossodon Yearling
Played in 104 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
21.8% Green
-
Selesnya 312 · 65.4%
-
Green 104 · 21.8%
-
Golgari 23 · 4.8%
-
Gruul 12 · 2.5%
- Other (7) 26 · 5.5%
430+45+1+3+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 3.86 · 5.4% (82 of 1,531 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.85 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Jermane, Pride of the Circus relevance 0.63 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.41 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.11 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.04 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.94 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.91 · 57.7% (60 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 2.90 · 53.8% (56 of 104 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.76 · 51.9% (54 of 104 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.73 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.60 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.58 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.57 · 68.3% (71 of 104 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.50 · 50.0% (52 of 104 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.42 · 47.1% (49 of 104 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.40 · 38.5% (40 of 104 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.38 · 65.4% (68 of 104 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 2.38 · 35.6% (37 of 104 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.37 · 53.8% (56 of 104 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.34 · 42.3% (44 of 104 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 2.20 · 35.6% (37 of 104 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 2.17 · 32.7% (34 of 104 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.15 · 42.3% (44 of 104 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.13 · 33.7% (35 of 104 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.11 · 74.0% (77 of 104 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.08 · 61.5% (64 of 104 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.04 · 55.8% (58 of 104 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.92 · 29.8% (31 of 104 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.88 · 53.8% (56 of 104 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 1.88 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.88 · 31.7% (33 of 104 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 1.84 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.83 · 50.0% (52 of 104 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.11 · 62.5% (65 of 104 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.04 · 64.4% (67 of 104 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.94 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.91 · 57.7% (60 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 2.90 · 53.8% (56 of 104 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.76 · 51.9% (54 of 104 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.73 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.60 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.58 · 49.0% (51 of 104 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.57 · 68.3% (71 of 104 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.50 · 50.0% (52 of 104 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.42 · 47.1% (49 of 104 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.40 · 38.5% (40 of 104 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.38 · 65.4% (68 of 104 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 2.38 · 35.6% (37 of 104 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.34 · 42.3% (44 of 104 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 2.20 · 35.6% (37 of 104 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 2.17 · 32.7% (34 of 104 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 2.15 · 42.3% (44 of 104 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.13 · 33.7% (35 of 104 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.11 · 74.0% (77 of 104 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 2.08 · 61.5% (64 of 104 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.04 · 55.8% (58 of 104 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.92 · 29.8% (31 of 104 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.88 · 53.8% (56 of 104 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 1.88 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.88 · 31.7% (33 of 104 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 1.84 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 1.83 · 50.0% (52 of 104 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 1.79 · 26.9% (28 of 104 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.79 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 1.77 · 26.9% (28 of 104 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 1.73 · 26.9% (28 of 104 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.64 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.63 · 26.0% (27 of 104 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 1.59 · 45.2% (47 of 104 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 1.54 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.29 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Vastwood Gorger relevance 1.25 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.24 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 1.22 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Forest Bear relevance 0.94 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.86 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 0.84 · 12.5% (13 of 104 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 0.85 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.37 · 53.8% (56 of 104 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.21 · 26.9% (28 of 104 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.87 · 35.6% (37 of 104 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 1.01 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
EDH data for Colossodon Yearling: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 104 real decks.





























