Opal Lake Gatekeepers
Played in 28 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
5.2% Azorius
- Five-Color 228 · 42.1%
- Sultai 220 · 40.7%
- Azorius 28 · 5.2%
- Simic 14 · 2.6%
- Esper 11 · 2.0%
- Bant 11 · 2.0%
- Other (12) 29 · 5.4%
All most relevant (30)
- Call to Heel relevance 4.84 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 4.65 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Owl Familiar relevance 4.63 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 4.60 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 4.59 · 78.6% (22 of 28 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 4.53 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 4.52 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 4.49 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Pondering Mage relevance 4.44 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Nightmares and Daydreams relevance 4.44 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 4.40 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Outlaw Medic relevance 4.38 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.37 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- G'raha Tia relevance 4.36 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 4.36 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 4.36 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Bandage relevance 4.33 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Oracle's Insight relevance 4.32 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Oracle of Tragedy relevance 4.31 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 4.29 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 4.28 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.28 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 4.23 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Murder of Crows relevance 4.21 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 4.21 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 4.19 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 4.18 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Oona's Grace relevance 4.15 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Hallowed Moonlight relevance 4.15 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 4.15 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Owl Familiar relevance 4.63 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 4.53 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 4.49 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Pondering Mage relevance 4.44 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Outlaw Medic relevance 4.38 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 4.37 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- G'raha Tia relevance 4.36 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Oracle of Tragedy relevance 4.31 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 4.29 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 4.23 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Murder of Crows relevance 4.21 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 4.21 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 4.18 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 4.15 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 4.13 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 4.08 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Phantasmal Shieldback relevance 4.08 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Palace Familiar relevance 4.07 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Ormos, Archive Keeper relevance 4.07 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 4.05 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 4.05 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Merfolk Windrobber relevance 4.02 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Hero in Training relevance 3.98 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 4.19 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Nutrient Block relevance 4.07 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Nightmares and Daydreams relevance 4.44 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 4.40 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Oracle's Insight relevance 4.32 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- New Perspectives relevance 4.11 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Origin of the Avengers relevance 4.07 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
All instants (13)
- Call to Heel relevance 4.84 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Overwhelming Intellect relevance 4.65 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 4.60 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 4.59 · 78.6% (22 of 28 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 4.36 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Bandage relevance 4.33 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Contradict relevance 4.28 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Oona's Grace relevance 4.15 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Hallowed Moonlight relevance 4.15 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Nexus Mentality relevance 4.12 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 4.09 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 4.07 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Aang's Defense relevance 3.96 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 4.52 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 4.36 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 4.28 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Healing Hands relevance 4.13 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Multiple Choice relevance 4.08 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Mentor's Guidance relevance 4.02 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Dominaria // Serra Faithkeeper relevance 3.97 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
EDH data for Opal Lake Gatekeepers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 28 real decks.