Opal Lake Gatekeepers
Played in 220 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
40.7% Sultai
- Five-Color 228 · 42.1%
- Sultai 220 · 40.7%
- Azorius 28 · 5.2%
- Simic 14 · 2.6%
- Esper 11 · 2.0%
- Bant 11 · 2.0%
- Other (12) 29 · 5.4%
All commanders (1)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 4.42 · 7.6% (214 of 2,815 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Saruli Gatekeepers relevance 4.93 · 71.8% (158 of 220 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 4.64 · 94.5% (208 of 220 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 4.58 · 93.2% (205 of 220 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 4.58 · 85.5% (188 of 220 decks)
- Gatekeeper Gargoyle relevance 4.53 · 78.6% (173 of 220 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 4.22 · 94.1% (207 of 220 decks)
- District Guide relevance 4.22 · 91.8% (202 of 220 decks)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 4.17 · 80.9% (178 of 220 decks)
- Way of the Thief relevance 4.13 · 76.4% (168 of 220 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 4.09 · 94.1% (207 of 220 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 4.07 · 90.5% (199 of 220 decks)
- Greenside Watcher relevance 4.06 · 74.1% (163 of 220 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 3.80 · 83.6% (184 of 220 decks)
- Gateway Shade relevance 3.79 · 55.0% (121 of 220 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 3.78 · 83.6% (184 of 220 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 3.72 · 95.0% (209 of 220 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 3.55 · 78.6% (173 of 220 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 2.45 · 63.2% (139 of 220 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.27 · 47.3% (104 of 220 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 2.01 · 51.8% (114 of 220 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 1.85 · 39.1% (86 of 220 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.58 · 40.5% (89 of 220 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.51 · 27.3% (60 of 220 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.50 · 33.2% (73 of 220 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.42 · 49.1% (108 of 220 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 1.39 · 30.9% (68 of 220 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 1.38 · 30.5% (67 of 220 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.34 · 44.5% (98 of 220 decks)
- Krydle of Baldur's Gate relevance 1.34 · 27.3% (60 of 220 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 1.30 · 31.4% (69 of 220 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Saruli Gatekeepers relevance 4.93 · 71.8% (158 of 220 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 4.64 · 94.5% (208 of 220 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 4.58 · 93.2% (205 of 220 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 4.58 · 85.5% (188 of 220 decks)
- Gatekeeper Gargoyle relevance 4.53 · 78.6% (173 of 220 decks)
- District Guide relevance 4.22 · 91.8% (202 of 220 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 4.07 · 90.5% (199 of 220 decks)
- Greenside Watcher relevance 4.06 · 74.1% (163 of 220 decks)
- Gateway Shade relevance 3.79 · 55.0% (121 of 220 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 3.78 · 83.6% (184 of 220 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.27 · 47.3% (104 of 220 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 1.85 · 39.1% (86 of 220 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.50 · 33.2% (73 of 220 decks)
- Krydle of Baldur's Gate relevance 1.34 · 27.3% (60 of 220 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 4.17 · 80.9% (178 of 220 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 3.80 · 83.6% (184 of 220 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 2.01 · 51.8% (114 of 220 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Guild Summit relevance 4.22 · 94.1% (207 of 220 decks)
- Way of the Thief relevance 4.13 · 76.4% (168 of 220 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.51 · 27.3% (60 of 220 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.34 · 44.5% (98 of 220 decks)
All instants (2)
- Eureka Moment relevance 1.30 · 31.4% (69 of 220 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 1.18 · 23.6% (52 of 220 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Open the Gates relevance 4.09 · 94.1% (207 of 220 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 3.72 · 95.0% (209 of 220 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 3.55 · 78.6% (173 of 220 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 2.45 · 63.2% (139 of 220 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.58 · 40.5% (89 of 220 decks)
- Explore relevance 1.42 · 49.1% (108 of 220 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 1.39 · 30.9% (68 of 220 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 1.38 · 30.5% (67 of 220 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Heap Gate relevance 3.99 · 96.8% (213 of 220 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 3.96 · 96.4% (212 of 220 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 3.95 · 95.5% (210 of 220 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 2.78 · 70.9% (156 of 220 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 2.09 · 64.1% (141 of 220 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.38 · 41.8% (92 of 220 decks)
All lands (13)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 4.17 · 87.7% (193 of 220 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 3.93 · 96.4% (212 of 220 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 3.92 · 95.5% (210 of 220 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 3.90 · 95.5% (210 of 220 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 3.82 · 96.4% (212 of 220 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 3.81 · 96.4% (212 of 220 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 3.75 · 94.1% (207 of 220 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 3.61 · 85.0% (187 of 220 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 3.38 · 95.9% (211 of 220 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 3.26 · 95.0% (209 of 220 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 3.24 · 95.9% (211 of 220 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 2.26 · 48.2% (106 of 220 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.29 · 34.5% (76 of 220 decks)
EDH data for Opal Lake Gatekeepers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 220 real decks.