Guildmages' Forum
Played in 164 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Bant
- Grixis 1,437 · 21.3%
- Five-Color 1,243 · 18.4%
- Boros 442 · 6.5%
- Golgari 391 · 5.8%
- Simic 274 · 4.1%
- Naya 261 · 3.9%
- Witch-Maw 231 · 3.4%
- Gruul 223 · 3.3%
- Selesnya 208 · 3.1%
- Ink-Treader 206 · 3.1%
- Mardu 190 · 2.8%
- Temur 176 · 2.6%
- Azorius 167 · 2.5%
- Bant 164 · 2.4%
- Rakdos 158 · 2.3%
- Orzhov 154 · 2.3%
- Sultai 144 · 2.1%
- Izzet 139 · 2.1%
- Other (14) 545 · 8.1%
All commanders (3)
- The Eleventh Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 0.69 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rose Tyler // The Thirteenth Doctor relevance 0.60 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa relevance 0.54 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (50 of 164 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.72 · 38.4% (63 of 164 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.71 · 33.5% (55 of 164 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.71 · 40.2% (66 of 164 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.70 · 35.4% (58 of 164 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.69 · 29.3% (48 of 164 decks)
- Yuna, Grand Summoner relevance 0.67 · 29.3% (48 of 164 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.67 · 47.6% (78 of 164 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.65 · 28.7% (47 of 164 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.61 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (41 of 164 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.60 · 31.1% (51 of 164 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.60 · 25.6% (42 of 164 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.60 · 34.8% (57 of 164 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.59 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.59 · 28.7% (47 of 164 decks)
- Wakka, Devoted Guardian relevance 0.59 · 25.6% (42 of 164 decks)
- Protection Magic relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (41 of 164 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Arwen, Mortal Queen relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.58 · 22.0% (36 of 164 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.56 · 37.8% (62 of 164 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.56 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Metastatic Evangel relevance 0.55 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.55 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.55 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.53 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Kimahri, Valiant Guardian relevance 0.53 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.52 · 22.0% (36 of 164 decks)
All creatures (25)
- Shelinda, Yevon Acolyte relevance 0.76 · 30.5% (50 of 164 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.71 · 33.5% (55 of 164 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.69 · 29.3% (48 of 164 decks)
- Yuna, Grand Summoner relevance 0.67 · 29.3% (48 of 164 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.65 · 28.7% (47 of 164 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.61 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (41 of 164 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.60 · 31.1% (51 of 164 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.60 · 34.8% (57 of 164 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.59 · 28.7% (47 of 164 decks)
- Wakka, Devoted Guardian relevance 0.59 · 25.6% (42 of 164 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Arwen, Mortal Queen relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.58 · 22.0% (36 of 164 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.56 · 37.8% (62 of 164 decks)
- Metastatic Evangel relevance 0.55 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.55 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.55 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.53 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Kimahri, Valiant Guardian relevance 0.53 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.52 · 22.0% (36 of 164 decks)
- Chocobo Knights relevance 0.51 · 22.0% (36 of 164 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.51 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.49 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.50 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.49 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.48 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.70 · 35.4% (58 of 164 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.67 · 47.6% (78 of 164 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.60 · 25.6% (42 of 164 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.59 · 26.2% (43 of 164 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.56 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.52 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.50 · 23.2% (38 of 164 decks)
All instants (2)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.71 · 40.2% (66 of 164 decks)
- Protection Magic relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (41 of 164 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.72 · 38.4% (63 of 164 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Opal Palace relevance 1.15 · 26.8% (44 of 164 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.84 · 39.0% (64 of 164 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.74 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.56 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.55 · 40.9% (67 of 164 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (21 of 164 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.53 · 20.1% (33 of 164 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.51 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
All lands (2)
- Port Town relevance 0.62 · 31.7% (52 of 164 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.58 · 30.5% (50 of 164 decks)
EDH data for Guildmages' Forum: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 164 real decks.