Guildmages' Forum
Played in 232 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
3.4% Witch-Maw
- Grixis 1,449 · 21.3%
- Five-Color 1,258 · 18.5%
- Boros 446 · 6.5%
- Golgari 392 · 5.8%
- Simic 276 · 4.1%
- Naya 264 · 3.9%
- Witch-Maw 232 · 3.4%
- Gruul 225 · 3.3%
- Selesnya 210 · 3.1%
- Ink-Treader 209 · 3.1%
- Mardu 189 · 2.8%
- Temur 178 · 2.6%
- Azorius 167 · 2.5%
- Bant 164 · 2.4%
- Rakdos 158 · 2.3%
- Orzhov 156 · 2.3%
- Sultai 145 · 2.1%
- Izzet 143 · 2.1%
- Other (14) 551 · 8.1%
All commanders (1)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.65 · 1.3% (15 of 1,159 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.37 · 59.1% (137 of 232 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.30 · 55.6% (129 of 232 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.29 · 44.8% (104 of 232 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.23 · 37.1% (86 of 232 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.17 · 42.7% (99 of 232 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.13 · 49.6% (115 of 232 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 1.10 · 28.4% (66 of 232 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.09 · 41.4% (96 of 232 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.08 · 40.5% (94 of 232 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.04 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 1.02 · 31.5% (73 of 232 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.99 · 33.2% (77 of 232 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.97 · 32.8% (76 of 232 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.97 · 25.9% (60 of 232 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.95 · 31.9% (74 of 232 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.91 · 27.6% (64 of 232 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.90 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.85 · 57.3% (133 of 232 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.84 · 20.7% (48 of 232 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.83 · 28.9% (67 of 232 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.81 · 25.4% (59 of 232 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.75 · 44.0% (102 of 232 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.75 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.75 · 18.5% (43 of 232 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.74 · 15.1% (35 of 232 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.71 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.70 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.70 · 31.0% (72 of 232 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.69 · 39.7% (92 of 232 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.37 · 59.1% (137 of 232 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.30 · 55.6% (129 of 232 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.29 · 44.8% (104 of 232 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.17 · 42.7% (99 of 232 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 1.10 · 28.4% (66 of 232 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 1.08 · 40.5% (94 of 232 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.04 · 35.3% (82 of 232 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 1.02 · 31.5% (73 of 232 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.97 · 32.8% (76 of 232 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.97 · 25.9% (60 of 232 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.91 · 27.6% (64 of 232 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.90 · 30.2% (70 of 232 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.84 · 20.7% (48 of 232 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.83 · 28.9% (67 of 232 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.81 · 25.4% (59 of 232 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.75 · 44.0% (102 of 232 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.75 · 22.8% (53 of 232 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.75 · 18.5% (43 of 232 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.74 · 15.1% (35 of 232 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.70 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.70 · 31.0% (72 of 232 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (35 of 232 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.64 · 21.1% (49 of 232 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.85 · 57.3% (133 of 232 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.66 · 40.9% (95 of 232 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.23 · 37.1% (86 of 232 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.13 · 49.6% (115 of 232 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.99 · 33.2% (77 of 232 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.95 · 31.9% (74 of 232 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.71 · 14.7% (34 of 232 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.69 · 39.7% (92 of 232 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.63 · 14.2% (33 of 232 decks)
All instants (1)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.09 · 41.4% (96 of 232 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.67 · 51.7% (120 of 232 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Opal Palace relevance 1.75 · 59.5% (138 of 232 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.91 · 31.0% (72 of 232 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.85 · 20.3% (47 of 232 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.68 · 25.4% (59 of 232 decks)
All lands (11)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.93 · 29.7% (69 of 232 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.92 · 29.3% (68 of 232 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 0.87 · 25.4% (59 of 232 decks)
- Vivid Meadow relevance 0.86 · 25.9% (60 of 232 decks)
- Aether Hub relevance 0.78 · 18.1% (42 of 232 decks)
- Arcane Sanctum relevance 0.76 · 44.0% (102 of 232 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.74 · 44.8% (104 of 232 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.74 · 47.0% (109 of 232 decks)
- Mirrodin's Core relevance 0.68 · 15.9% (37 of 232 decks)
- Sandsteppe Citadel relevance 0.66 · 41.8% (97 of 232 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.64 · 30.6% (71 of 232 decks)
EDH data for Guildmages' Forum: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 232 real decks.