Lush Oasis
Played in 1,947 Sultai decks
2214+5+1+1+4+3+7+29+
Color Identity Spread
13.0% Sultai
-
Simic 8,592 · 57.3%
-
Sultai 1,947 · 13.0%
-
Temur 1,434 · 9.6%
-
Bant 1,331 · 8.9%
-
Five-Color 1,305 · 8.7%
- Other (15) 397 · 2.6%
Commanders
Archelos, Lagoon Mystic 4.1% of decks
Archelos, Lagoon Mystic 4.1% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator 24.2% of decks
Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator 24.2% of decks
Glarb, Calamity's Augur 1.5% of decks
Glarb, Calamity's Augur 1.5% of decks
Yarok, the Desecrated 1.6% of decks
Yarok, the Desecrated 1.6% of decks
Kotis, the Fangkeeper 1.3% of decks
Kotis, the Fangkeeper 1.3% of decks
Maralen, Fae Ascendant 1.0% of decks
Maralen, Fae Ascendant 1.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Map the Frontier 6.5% of decks
Map the Frontier 6.5% of decks
Tatyova, Benthic Druid 18.0% of decks
Tatyova, Benthic Druid 18.0% of decks
Llanowar Elves 23.4% of decks
Llanowar Elves 23.4% of decks
Commander's Sphere 10.6% of decks
Commander's Sphere 10.6% of decks
Villainous Wealth 15.1% of decks
Villainous Wealth 15.1% of decks
Spelunking 10.7% of decks
Spelunking 10.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (22)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 1.49 · 4.1% (89 of 2,176 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 1.40 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.00 · 1.5% (204 of 14,049 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.97 · 1.6% (120 of 7,306 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 0.86 · 1.3% (127 of 9,529 decks)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 0.85 · 1.0% (284 of 27,363 decks)
- Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 0.83 · 1.6% (58 of 3,529 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.76 · 1.1% (142 of 13,429 decks)
- Gonti, Canny Acquisitor relevance 0.75 · 1.3% (70 of 5,316 decks)
- Felix Five-Boots relevance 0.73 · 1.5% (42 of 2,762 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.68 · 1.3% (46 of 3,504 decks)
- Mimeoplasm, Revered One relevance 0.48 · 1.2% (16 of 1,304 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (3 of 112 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Nashi, Illusion Gadgeteer relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.25 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.15 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
All most relevant (14)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (126 of 1,947 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.35 · 18.0% (351 of 1,947 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (456 of 1,947 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.34 · 10.6% (207 of 1,947 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.32 · 15.1% (294 of 1,947 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.32 · 10.7% (209 of 1,947 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (203 of 1,947 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (312 of 1,947 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.31 · 17.1% (333 of 1,947 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (298 of 1,947 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (178 of 1,947 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (151 of 1,947 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (257 of 1,947 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (175 of 1,947 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.35 · 18.0% (351 of 1,947 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.34 · 23.4% (456 of 1,947 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.32 · 10.4% (203 of 1,947 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (178 of 1,947 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (257 of 1,947 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.34 · 10.6% (207 of 1,947 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Spelunking relevance 0.32 · 10.7% (209 of 1,947 decks)
All instants (4)
- Negate relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (312 of 1,947 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (298 of 1,947 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (151 of 1,947 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (175 of 1,947 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (126 of 1,947 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.32 · 15.1% (294 of 1,947 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.31 · 17.1% (333 of 1,947 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.58 · 28.6% (556 of 1,947 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.43 · 19.5% (379 of 1,947 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.43 · 23.7% (461 of 1,947 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.39 · 24.2% (471 of 1,947 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (127 of 1,947 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (127 of 1,947 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.34 · 6.7% (130 of 1,947 decks)
All lands (29)
- Festering Gulch relevance 1.94 · 42.0% (817 of 1,947 decks)
- Soured Springs relevance 1.85 · 36.8% (717 of 1,947 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 1.28 · 44.7% (870 of 1,947 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 1.16 · 40.7% (792 of 1,947 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 1.10 · 36.5% (710 of 1,947 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.54 · 38.0% (739 of 1,947 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.49 · 14.3% (278 of 1,947 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.47 · 23.0% (448 of 1,947 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (253 of 1,947 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.43 · 12.6% (245 of 1,947 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (210 of 1,947 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.42 · 12.4% (242 of 1,947 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.41 · 18.6% (363 of 1,947 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.40 · 10.1% (197 of 1,947 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (144 of 1,947 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (218 of 1,947 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.39 · 25.7% (500 of 1,947 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.39 · 22.0% (429 of 1,947 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (117 of 1,947 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.37 · 12.8% (250 of 1,947 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (166 of 1,947 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (135 of 1,947 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (171 of 1,947 decks)
- Treno, Dark City relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (127 of 1,947 decks)
- Murky Sewer relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (109 of 1,947 decks)
- Gohn, Town of Ruin relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (118 of 1,947 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (111 of 1,947 decks)
- Strangled Cemetery relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (106 of 1,947 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.28 · 9.2% (179 of 1,947 decks)
EDH data for Lush Oasis: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,947 real decks.























































