Batterhorn
Played in 112 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
36.4% Gruul
230+47+1+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 3.28 · 2.7% (86 of 3,183 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.45 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 2.57 · 59.8% (67 of 112 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 2.03 · 45.5% (51 of 112 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.92 · 41.1% (46 of 112 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.84 · 41.1% (46 of 112 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.81 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.69 · 54.5% (61 of 112 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.69 · 48.2% (54 of 112 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.63 · 67.9% (76 of 112 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.60 · 42.9% (48 of 112 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.58 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 1.57 · 30.4% (34 of 112 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.57 · 42.0% (47 of 112 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 1.57 · 33.0% (37 of 112 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 1.56 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.54 · 53.6% (60 of 112 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.52 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.51 · 44.6% (50 of 112 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.50 · 49.1% (55 of 112 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.49 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 1.48 · 29.5% (33 of 112 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.48 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.46 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Indrik Stomphowler relevance 1.45 · 25.0% (28 of 112 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.40 · 61.6% (69 of 112 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 1.35 · 26.8% (30 of 112 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.35 · 42.0% (47 of 112 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.33 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 1.32 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 1.31 · 32.1% (36 of 112 decks)
- Aether Charge relevance 1.21 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
All creatures (47)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 2.57 · 59.8% (67 of 112 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 2.03 · 45.5% (51 of 112 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 1.92 · 41.1% (46 of 112 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 1.84 · 41.1% (46 of 112 decks)
- Battlefront Krushok relevance 1.81 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 1.69 · 54.5% (61 of 112 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.69 · 48.2% (54 of 112 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.63 · 67.9% (76 of 112 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.60 · 42.9% (48 of 112 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 1.58 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Fangren Firstborn relevance 1.57 · 30.4% (34 of 112 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 1.57 · 42.0% (47 of 112 decks)
- Giant Cindermaw relevance 1.57 · 33.0% (37 of 112 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 1.56 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 1.54 · 53.6% (60 of 112 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 1.52 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 1.51 · 44.6% (50 of 112 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.50 · 49.1% (55 of 112 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 1.49 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 1.48 · 29.5% (33 of 112 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 1.48 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 1.46 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Indrik Stomphowler relevance 1.45 · 25.0% (28 of 112 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.40 · 61.6% (69 of 112 decks)
- Garruk's Harbinger relevance 1.35 · 26.8% (30 of 112 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 1.35 · 42.0% (47 of 112 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.33 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Bedhead Beastie relevance 1.32 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 1.31 · 32.1% (36 of 112 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 1.20 · 26.8% (30 of 112 decks)
- Ridgescale Tusker relevance 1.20 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 1.18 · 28.6% (32 of 112 decks)
- Ravenous Baloth relevance 1.17 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Paleoloth relevance 1.15 · 25.9% (29 of 112 decks)
- Baloth Woodcrasher relevance 1.12 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 1.12 · 24.1% (27 of 112 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 1.11 · 39.3% (44 of 112 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 1.11 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 1.10 · 22.3% (25 of 112 decks)
- Migloz, Maze Crusher relevance 1.06 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (28 of 112 decks)
- Advocate of the Beast relevance 1.02 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Axebane Ferox relevance 1.02 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.98 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.96 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Blossoming Bogbeast relevance 0.96 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Contagious Vorrac relevance 0.96 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Aether Charge relevance 1.21 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.98 · 31.3% (35 of 112 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 1.37 · 32.1% (36 of 112 decks)
EDH data for Batterhorn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 112 real decks.

























