Ezuri's Archers
Played in 60 Simic decks
130+31+2+2+5+7+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
2.8% Simic
-
Selesnya 1,001 · 46.6%
-
Green 412 · 19.2%
-
Golgari 361 · 16.8%
-
Naya 114 · 5.3%
-
Sultai 94 · 4.4%
-
Simic 60 · 2.8%
- Other (8) 107 · 5.0%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Wood Elves 41.7% of decks
Wood Elves 41.7% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 36.7% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 36.7% of decks
Virulent Emissary 20.0% of decks
Virulent Emissary 20.0% of decks
Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen 21.7% of decks
Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen 21.7% of decks
Elvish Visionary 26.7% of decks
Elvish Visionary 26.7% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 25.0% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 25.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 1.05 · 1.5% (3 of 206 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.18 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.12 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 1.05 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.03 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.99 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.93 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.91 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.89 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.85 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.82 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Plunder the Trollshaws relevance 0.80 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 0.78 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.77 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.75 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.75 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.70 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.70 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.66 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.65 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Thranduil's Company relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.63 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.60 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.18 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.12 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 1.05 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.03 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.99 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.93 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.93 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.91 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.89 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.86 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.85 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 0.78 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.77 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.75 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.75 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.70 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.70 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.66 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Thranduil's Company relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.63 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.60 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.58 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.56 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.53 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.52 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.46 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 0.43 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.59 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.58 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Asceticism relevance 0.65 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.56 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
All instants (5)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.82 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Plunder the Trollshaws relevance 0.80 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.47 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.68 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.57 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.48 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.48 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.42 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All lands (2)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.55 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.53 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
EDH data for Ezuri's Archers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 60 real decks.



































