Strength of the Pack
Played in 132 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
730+20+1+4+5+10+3+7+
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Itzquinth, Firstborn of Gishath relevance 1.28 · 2.9% (5 of 174 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.81 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.54 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Jeska, Thrice Reborn // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.45 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.43 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.63 · 12.9% (17 of 132 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.60 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.58 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Thundering Spineback relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Raptor Hatchling relevance 0.52 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Raging Regisaur relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.47 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.46 · 23.5% (31 of 132 decks)
- Belligerent Yearling relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Triumphant Chomp relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Urban Daggertooth relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Ripjaw Raptor relevance 0.39 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Tovolar's Huntmaster // Tovolar's Packleader relevance 0.38 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.63 · 12.9% (17 of 132 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.54 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Thundering Spineback relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
- Raptor Hatchling relevance 0.52 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Raging Regisaur relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Belligerent Yearling relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Urban Daggertooth relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Ripjaw Raptor relevance 0.39 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Tovolar's Huntmaster // Tovolar's Packleader relevance 0.38 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Regal Imperiosaur relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 0.36 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 0.36 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.34 · 13.6% (18 of 132 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.37 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- New Horizons relevance 0.60 · 11.4% (15 of 132 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.46 · 10.6% (14 of 132 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
All instants (5)
- Naturalize relevance 0.58 · 14.4% (19 of 132 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Signature Slam relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (10 of 132 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.47 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.46 · 23.5% (31 of 132 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.41 · 9.8% (13 of 132 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Triumphant Chomp relevance 0.41 · 6.1% (8 of 132 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (9 of 132 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Omashu City relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (16 of 132 decks)
- Savage Mansion relevance 0.39 · 9.1% (12 of 132 decks)
- Racers' Ring relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
All lands (7)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 1.07 · 47.0% (62 of 132 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.67 · 43.9% (58 of 132 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.67 · 21.2% (28 of 132 decks)
- Timber Gorge relevance 0.66 · 17.4% (23 of 132 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.59 · 15.2% (20 of 132 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.49 · 12.9% (17 of 132 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.48 · 26.5% (35 of 132 decks)
EDH data for Strength of the Pack: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 132 real decks.




























































