Strength of the Pack
Played in 205 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
All most relevant (30)
- New Horizons relevance 1.41 · 26.3% (54 of 205 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 1.13 · 32.7% (67 of 205 decks)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 1.12 · 28.3% (58 of 205 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 1.09 · 23.9% (49 of 205 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.99 · 20.5% (42 of 205 decks)
- Charging Tuskodon relevance 0.98 · 18.5% (38 of 205 decks)
- Territorial Hammerskull relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (35 of 205 decks)
- Raging Regisaur relevance 0.92 · 24.9% (51 of 205 decks)
- Itzquinth, Firstborn of Gishath relevance 0.92 · 30.7% (63 of 205 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.90 · 41.5% (85 of 205 decks)
- Crested Herdcaller relevance 0.89 · 15.1% (31 of 205 decks)
- Cherished Hatchling relevance 0.88 · 15.6% (32 of 205 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 0.87 · 20.5% (42 of 205 decks)
- Dinosaur Stampede relevance 0.86 · 17.6% (36 of 205 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.85 · 34.6% (71 of 205 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.84 · 24.4% (50 of 205 decks)
- Thundering Spineback relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (48 of 205 decks)
- Needletooth Raptor relevance 0.83 · 19.5% (40 of 205 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.82 · 34.6% (71 of 205 decks)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.81 · 28.8% (59 of 205 decks)
- Imperial Ceratops relevance 0.81 · 15.6% (32 of 205 decks)
- Kinjalli's Caller relevance 0.80 · 26.8% (55 of 205 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.80 · 38.5% (79 of 205 decks)
- Charging Monstrosaur relevance 0.79 · 14.6% (30 of 205 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.79 · 45.9% (94 of 205 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.78 · 41.5% (85 of 205 decks)
- Wakening Sun's Avatar relevance 0.76 · 34.6% (71 of 205 decks)
- Raptor Hatchling relevance 0.75 · 16.1% (33 of 205 decks)
- Bellowing Aegisaur relevance 0.74 · 22.4% (46 of 205 decks)
- Otepec Huntmaster relevance 0.73 · 32.2% (66 of 205 decks)
All creatures (38)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 1.13 · 32.7% (67 of 205 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.99 · 20.5% (42 of 205 decks)
- Charging Tuskodon relevance 0.98 · 18.5% (38 of 205 decks)
- Territorial Hammerskull relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (35 of 205 decks)
- Raging Regisaur relevance 0.92 · 24.9% (51 of 205 decks)
- Itzquinth, Firstborn of Gishath relevance 0.92 · 30.7% (63 of 205 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.90 · 41.5% (85 of 205 decks)
- Crested Herdcaller relevance 0.89 · 15.1% (31 of 205 decks)
- Cherished Hatchling relevance 0.88 · 15.6% (32 of 205 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 0.87 · 20.5% (42 of 205 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.85 · 34.6% (71 of 205 decks)
- Scytheclaw Raptor relevance 0.84 · 24.4% (50 of 205 decks)
- Thundering Spineback relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (48 of 205 decks)
- Needletooth Raptor relevance 0.83 · 19.5% (40 of 205 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.82 · 34.6% (71 of 205 decks)
- Imperial Ceratops relevance 0.81 · 15.6% (32 of 205 decks)
- Kinjalli's Caller relevance 0.80 · 26.8% (55 of 205 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.80 · 38.5% (79 of 205 decks)
- Charging Monstrosaur relevance 0.79 · 14.6% (30 of 205 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.79 · 45.9% (94 of 205 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.78 · 41.5% (85 of 205 decks)
- Wakening Sun's Avatar relevance 0.76 · 34.6% (71 of 205 decks)
- Raptor Hatchling relevance 0.75 · 16.1% (33 of 205 decks)
- Bellowing Aegisaur relevance 0.74 · 22.4% (46 of 205 decks)
- Otepec Huntmaster relevance 0.73 · 32.2% (66 of 205 decks)
- Atzocan Seer relevance 0.71 · 27.3% (56 of 205 decks)
- Forerunner of the Empire relevance 0.71 · 22.0% (45 of 205 decks)
- Sun-Crested Pterodon relevance 0.70 · 10.7% (22 of 205 decks)
- Spike-Tailed Ceratops relevance 0.70 · 10.7% (22 of 205 decks)
- Snapping Sailback relevance 0.69 · 14.6% (30 of 205 decks)
- Regisaur Alpha relevance 0.69 · 35.1% (72 of 205 decks)
- Belligerent Yearling relevance 0.69 · 17.6% (36 of 205 decks)
- Ravenous Daggertooth relevance 0.68 · 12.7% (26 of 205 decks)
- Ornery Dilophosaur relevance 0.66 · 10.7% (22 of 205 decks)
- Polyraptor relevance 0.66 · 24.9% (51 of 205 decks)
- Imperial Aerosaur relevance 0.65 · 11.2% (23 of 205 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.65 · 25.9% (53 of 205 decks)
- Goring Ceratops relevance 0.65 · 20.5% (42 of 205 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- New Horizons relevance 1.41 · 26.3% (54 of 205 decks)
- Tilonalli's Crown relevance 0.69 · 10.2% (21 of 205 decks)
All instants (3)
- Naturalize relevance 1.09 · 23.9% (49 of 205 decks)
- Dinosaur Stampede relevance 0.86 · 17.6% (36 of 205 decks)
- Pounce relevance 0.68 · 11.2% (23 of 205 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 1.12 · 28.3% (58 of 205 decks)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.81 · 28.8% (59 of 205 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.70 · 22.0% (45 of 205 decks)
All lands (4)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 1.09 · 36.1% (74 of 205 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.96 · 30.2% (62 of 205 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.92 · 31.7% (65 of 205 decks)
- Stone Quarry relevance 0.79 · 16.1% (33 of 205 decks)
EDH data for Strength of the Pack: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 205 real decks.