Burrog Barrage
Played in 140 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
6.6% Gruul
All commanders (4)
- Abomination, Terrifying Titan relevance 0.60 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Dargo, the Shipwrecker // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.52 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Guild Artisan relevance 0.40 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Strax, Sontaran Nurse relevance 0.36 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 1.51 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 1.39 · 34.3% (48 of 140 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 1.16 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 1.12 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 1.09 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 1.06 · 32.1% (45 of 140 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.00 · 32.9% (46 of 140 decks)
- Assert Perfection relevance 0.94 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Tenderize relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 0.88 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.88 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.84 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Rabid Gnaw relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.76 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.75 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 0.69 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Giantfall relevance 0.64 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.63 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.63 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Quarrel relevance 0.61 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Rite of Passage relevance 0.60 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.60 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.59 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- HULK SMASH! relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.58 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Noxious Newt relevance 1.16 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 0.88 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 0.69 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.62 · 17.9% (25 of 140 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.58 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.54 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.51 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Advocate of the Beast relevance 0.50 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.84 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Rite of Passage relevance 0.60 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.59 · 20.7% (29 of 140 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.51 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.50 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Lasting Tarfire relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
All instants (23)
- Bite Down relevance 1.39 · 34.3% (48 of 140 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 1.12 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 1.06 · 32.1% (45 of 140 decks)
- Tenderize relevance 0.93 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.88 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Rabid Gnaw relevance 0.82 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.76 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.75 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Giantfall relevance 0.64 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.63 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.63 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Monstrous Rage relevance 0.62 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Quarrel relevance 0.61 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.60 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- HULK SMASH! relevance 0.58 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Lightning Strike relevance 0.56 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.54 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.53 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.52 · 24.3% (34 of 140 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.50 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.48 · 13.6% (19 of 140 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 1.51 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 1.09 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.00 · 32.9% (46 of 140 decks)
- Assert Perfection relevance 0.94 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.58 · 15.7% (22 of 140 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.56 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Nibelheim Aflame relevance 0.52 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.51 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
All lands (2)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.76 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.50 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
EDH data for Burrog Barrage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 140 real decks.