Faces of the Past
Played in 104 Grixis decks
Color Identity Spread
3.9% Grixis
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Tetsuo Umezawa relevance 0.48 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.84 · 31.7% (33 of 104 decks)
- Marrow-Gnawer relevance 1.42 · 33.7% (35 of 104 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.24 · 29.8% (31 of 104 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.21 · 32.7% (34 of 104 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 1.16 · 24.0% (25 of 104 decks)
- Lord Skitter, Sewer King relevance 1.14 · 27.9% (29 of 104 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 1.07 · 25.0% (26 of 104 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 1.04 · 29.8% (31 of 104 decks)
- Vren, the Relentless relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (26 of 104 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 1.01 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Voracious Vermin relevance 1.00 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Piper of the Swarm relevance 0.97 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Lord Skitter's Butcher relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Persistent Marshstalker relevance 0.96 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.94 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Song of Totentanz relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.91 · 27.9% (29 of 104 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.90 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.89 · 26.0% (27 of 104 decks)
- Totentanz, Swarm Piper relevance 0.89 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.88 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.86 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.86 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.84 · 25.0% (26 of 104 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.83 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.82 · 24.0% (25 of 104 decks)
- Karumonix, the Rat King relevance 0.82 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.82 · 21.2% (22 of 104 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.82 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Marrow-Gnawer relevance 1.42 · 33.7% (35 of 104 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.24 · 29.8% (31 of 104 decks)
- Bloodline Necromancer relevance 1.21 · 32.7% (34 of 104 decks)
- Galecaster Colossus relevance 1.16 · 24.0% (25 of 104 decks)
- Lord Skitter, Sewer King relevance 1.14 · 27.9% (29 of 104 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 1.07 · 25.0% (26 of 104 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 1.04 · 29.8% (31 of 104 decks)
- Vren, the Relentless relevance 1.02 · 25.0% (26 of 104 decks)
- Voracious Vermin relevance 1.00 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Piper of the Swarm relevance 0.97 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Lord Skitter's Butcher relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Persistent Marshstalker relevance 0.96 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.89 · 26.0% (27 of 104 decks)
- Totentanz, Swarm Piper relevance 0.89 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.88 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Basalt Ravager relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.86 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Karumonix, the Rat King relevance 0.82 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.82 · 21.2% (22 of 104 decks)
- Bloodline Pretender relevance 0.82 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.82 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Pack Rat relevance 0.81 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Ogre Slumlord relevance 0.81 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 0.80 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Valley Rotcaller relevance 0.79 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Swarm of Rats relevance 0.78 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Chittering Witch relevance 0.78 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Apprentice Necromancer relevance 0.76 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Patron Wizard relevance 0.76 · 14.4% (15 of 104 decks)
- Azure Beastbinder relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Nashi, Searcher in the Dark relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (12 of 104 decks)
- Shoreline Looter relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Tangled Colony relevance 0.69 · 15.4% (16 of 104 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.91 · 27.9% (29 of 104 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.86 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (12 of 104 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.84 · 31.7% (33 of 104 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 1.01 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.94 · 28.8% (30 of 104 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.90 · 19.2% (20 of 104 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.84 · 25.0% (26 of 104 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.83 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.82 · 24.0% (25 of 104 decks)
- Molten Echoes relevance 0.76 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
All instants (1)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.76 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Song of Totentanz relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Swarmyard relevance 1.07 · 24.0% (25 of 104 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.96 · 27.9% (29 of 104 decks)
All lands (1)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.78 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
EDH data for Faces of the Past: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 104 real decks.