Faces of the Past
Played in 157 Azorius decks
730+10+2+15+12+11+
Color Identity Spread
6.0% Azorius
Commanders
Timin, Youthful Geist // Rhoda, Geist Avenger 1.1% of decks
Timin, Youthful Geist // Rhoda, Geist Avenger 1.1% of decks
Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Folk Hero 1.2% of decks
Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Folk Hero 1.2% of decks
Ojutai, Soul of Winter 2.3% of decks
Ojutai, Soul of Winter 2.3% of decks
Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor 2.1% of decks
Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor 2.1% of decks
Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Folk Hero 4.2% of decks
Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Folk Hero 4.2% of decks
Renari, Merchant of Marvels // Folk Hero 1.9% of decks
Renari, Merchant of Marvels // Folk Hero 1.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Opposition 43.9% of decks
Opposition 43.9% of decks
Blustersquall 42.7% of decks
Blustersquall 42.7% of decks
Drain Power 21.7% of decks
Drain Power 21.7% of decks
Aura of Dominion 22.3% of decks
Aura of Dominion 22.3% of decks
Diversionary Tactics 21.7% of decks
Diversionary Tactics 21.7% of decks
Ensnare 28.7% of decks
Ensnare 28.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Timin, Youthful Geist // Rhoda, Geist Avenger relevance 1.04 · 1.1% (7 of 612 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Folk Hero relevance 0.83 · 1.2% (4 of 322 decks)
- Ojutai, Soul of Winter relevance 0.68 · 2.3% (2 of 87 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.67 · 2.1% (2 of 95 decks)
- Imoen, Mystic Trickster // Folk Hero relevance 0.51 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Renari, Merchant of Marvels // Folk Hero relevance 0.40 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Tobias, Doomed Conqueror relevance 0.36 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Opposition relevance 1.51 · 43.9% (69 of 157 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 1.46 · 42.7% (67 of 157 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 1.45 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 1.43 · 22.3% (35 of 157 decks)
- Diversionary Tactics relevance 1.43 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Ensnare relevance 1.42 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.41 · 38.9% (61 of 157 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 1.39 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Flood relevance 1.38 · 22.3% (35 of 157 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 1.37 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 1.33 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 1.32 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 1.31 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 1.30 · 36.3% (57 of 157 decks)
- Ballynock Trapper relevance 1.30 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 1.28 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Court Street Denizen relevance 1.28 · 35.7% (56 of 157 decks)
- Energy Arc relevance 1.28 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Energy Flux relevance 1.28 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Eternal Dominion relevance 1.27 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Cryptic Gateway relevance 1.27 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 1.27 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Fogwalker relevance 1.27 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 1.27 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.27 · 38.9% (61 of 157 decks)
- Eye of the Storm relevance 1.27 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.27 · 40.1% (63 of 157 decks)
- Dreamshackle Geist relevance 1.27 · 37.6% (59 of 157 decks)
- Flatline relevance 1.27 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 1.26 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 1.39 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Ballynock Trapper relevance 1.30 · 23.6% (37 of 157 decks)
- Court Street Denizen relevance 1.28 · 35.7% (56 of 157 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 1.27 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Fogwalker relevance 1.27 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Dreamshackle Geist relevance 1.27 · 37.6% (59 of 157 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 1.25 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Gideon's Avenger relevance 1.23 · 25.5% (40 of 157 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 1.21 · 25.5% (40 of 157 decks)
- Encouraging Aviator // Jump relevance 1.18 · 17.2% (27 of 157 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Cryptic Gateway relevance 1.27 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.27 · 38.9% (61 of 157 decks)
All enchantments (15)
- Opposition relevance 1.51 · 43.9% (69 of 157 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 1.43 · 22.3% (35 of 157 decks)
- Diversionary Tactics relevance 1.43 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Flood relevance 1.38 · 22.3% (35 of 157 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 1.37 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 1.31 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 1.30 · 36.3% (57 of 157 decks)
- Energy Flux relevance 1.28 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Eye of the Storm relevance 1.27 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 1.26 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Crackdown relevance 1.25 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Dream Halls relevance 1.24 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Call to the Kindred relevance 1.24 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 1.19 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Cast Through Time relevance 1.18 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
All instants (12)
- Blustersquall relevance 1.46 · 42.7% (67 of 157 decks)
- Ensnare relevance 1.42 · 28.7% (45 of 157 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 1.28 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Energy Arc relevance 1.28 · 22.9% (36 of 157 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.27 · 40.1% (63 of 157 decks)
- Flatline relevance 1.27 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.23 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Gather Specimens relevance 1.22 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Dream's Grip relevance 1.21 · 19.7% (31 of 157 decks)
- Epiphany at the Drownyard relevance 1.20 · 17.8% (28 of 157 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.18 · 17.2% (27 of 157 decks)
- Ertai's Meddling relevance 1.18 · 17.2% (27 of 157 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Drain Power relevance 1.45 · 21.7% (34 of 157 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.41 · 38.9% (61 of 157 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 1.33 · 20.4% (32 of 157 decks)
- Entrancing Melody relevance 1.32 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Eternal Dominion relevance 1.27 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 1.27 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- Exhaustion relevance 1.26 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 1.24 · 18.5% (29 of 157 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 1.22 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
- Sleep relevance 1.21 · 32.5% (51 of 157 decks)
- Blinding Light relevance 1.19 · 19.1% (30 of 157 decks)
EDH data for Faces of the Past: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 157 real decks.
















































