Dramatic Entrance
Played in 1,150 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
1.2K decks
All commanders (30)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 3.13 · 6.7% (162 of 2,420 decks)
- Toph, Greatest Earthbender relevance 1.53 · 1.1% (18 of 1,687 decks)
- Maular, the Next Evolution relevance 1.15 · 1.5% (25 of 1,696 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 1.05 · 1.7% (15 of 864 decks)
- Arcades Sabboth relevance 0.97 · 1.6% (2 of 126 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.95 · 2.4% (8 of 335 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.94 · 1.4% (14 of 988 decks)
- Kogla and Yidaro relevance 0.81 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.80 · 1.4% (9 of 627 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.77 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Timmy, Power Gamer relevance 0.61 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Faceless One relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.59 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.59 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Old Gnawbone relevance 0.58 · 1.6% (4 of 258 decks)
- Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut relevance 0.53 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- The Fabulous Frog-Man relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.45 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Shizuko, Caller of Autumn relevance 0.41 · 1.7% (2 of 121 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.39 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.38 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Ruric Thar, Magecrusher relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Wolverine, Claws Out relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (2 of 192 decks)
- Loot, the Nexus relevance 0.27 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.25 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.25 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.25 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.23 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.23 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All parallel cards (2)
All most relevant (30)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.53 · 29.8% (343 of 1,150 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 1.37 · 26.1% (300 of 1,150 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.37 · 23.3% (268 of 1,150 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.16 · 16.5% (190 of 1,150 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.08 · 17.5% (201 of 1,150 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 1.07 · 21.7% (250 of 1,150 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.05 · 41.0% (471 of 1,150 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 1.01 · 26.1% (300 of 1,150 decks)
- Lure of Prey relevance 0.93 · 10.1% (116 of 1,150 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.92 · 39.3% (452 of 1,150 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (156 of 1,150 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.89 · 12.1% (139 of 1,150 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.84 · 22.7% (261 of 1,150 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.84 · 13.0% (150 of 1,150 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.84 · 16.0% (184 of 1,150 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.83 · 22.5% (259 of 1,150 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.82 · 17.0% (196 of 1,150 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.82 · 20.9% (240 of 1,150 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.82 · 35.6% (409 of 1,150 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.81 · 18.7% (215 of 1,150 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 0.80 · 10.1% (116 of 1,150 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.80 · 45.5% (523 of 1,150 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (173 of 1,150 decks)
- Quicksilver Amulet relevance 0.79 · 13.9% (160 of 1,150 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.79 · 19.4% (223 of 1,150 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.78 · 10.1% (116 of 1,150 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.75 · 24.5% (282 of 1,150 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.72 · 20.2% (232 of 1,150 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.72 · 9.0% (103 of 1,150 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 0.71 · 9.3% (107 of 1,150 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.53 · 29.8% (343 of 1,150 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 1.37 · 26.1% (300 of 1,150 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.37 · 23.3% (268 of 1,150 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.16 · 16.5% (190 of 1,150 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.08 · 17.5% (201 of 1,150 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.91 · 13.6% (156 of 1,150 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 0.89 · 12.1% (139 of 1,150 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.84 · 22.7% (261 of 1,150 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 0.84 · 13.0% (150 of 1,150 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.84 · 16.0% (184 of 1,150 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.82 · 17.0% (196 of 1,150 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.82 · 20.9% (240 of 1,150 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.82 · 35.6% (409 of 1,150 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.81 · 18.7% (215 of 1,150 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 0.80 · 10.1% (116 of 1,150 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 0.78 · 10.1% (116 of 1,150 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.72 · 9.0% (103 of 1,150 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 0.71 · 9.3% (107 of 1,150 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 0.71 · 9.7% (112 of 1,150 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.71 · 20.0% (230 of 1,150 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.70 · 27.1% (312 of 1,150 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.68 · 10.8% (124 of 1,150 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.66 · 8.9% (102 of 1,150 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 1.07 · 21.7% (250 of 1,150 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 1.01 · 26.1% (300 of 1,150 decks)
- Quicksilver Amulet relevance 0.79 · 13.9% (160 of 1,150 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.65 · 20.2% (232 of 1,150 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.05 · 41.0% (471 of 1,150 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.83 · 22.5% (259 of 1,150 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.79 · 15.0% (173 of 1,150 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.69 · 12.9% (148 of 1,150 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (171 of 1,150 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.65 · 17.5% (201 of 1,150 decks)
All instants (6)
- Lure of Prey relevance 0.93 · 10.1% (116 of 1,150 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.79 · 19.4% (223 of 1,150 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.75 · 24.5% (282 of 1,150 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.72 · 20.2% (232 of 1,150 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.69 · 15.7% (180 of 1,150 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.66 · 33.5% (385 of 1,150 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.92 · 39.3% (452 of 1,150 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.80 · 45.5% (523 of 1,150 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.71 · 13.7% (157 of 1,150 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.71 · 15.7% (180 of 1,150 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.70 · 9.7% (112 of 1,150 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.69 · 33.4% (384 of 1,150 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.67 · 20.4% (235 of 1,150 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.67 · 15.5% (178 of 1,150 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.88 · 27.8% (320 of 1,150 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.71 · 17.2% (198 of 1,150 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.64 · 15.0% (172 of 1,150 decks)
EDH data for Dramatic Entrance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,150 real decks.