Cards like Prismatic Omen
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wildgrowth Archaic
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Grixis Illusionist
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Grixis Illusionist 28%
- Dream Thrush 21%
- Tideshaper Mystic 19%
- Reef Shaman 14%
- Sea Snidd 3%
- Terraformer 2%
Cards like Might of Alara
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Might of Alara 19%
- Gaea's Might 16%
Cards like Scion of Draco
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Scion of Draco 36%
- Draco 26%
Cards like Crystalline Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Crystalline Crawler 21%
- Etched Oracle 16%
Cards like Nishoba Brawler
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nishoba Brawler 21%
- Territorial Maro 14%
- Matca Rioters 9%
Cards like Convincing Mirage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Lush Growth
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Lush Growth 57%
- Song of the Dryads 14%
Cards like Manaforce Mace
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Manaforce Mace 21%
- Power Armor 9%
Cards like Nylea's Presence
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Abundant Growth, Unbridled Growth
Cards like Navigator's Compass
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Spiral
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 45%
- Joint Exploration 16%
- Eureka Moment 10%
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 24%
- Pongify 17%
Cards like Energybending
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Energybending 33%
- Shimmering Mirage 7%
- Jinx 3%
Cards like Fireshrieker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fireshrieker 19%
- Rover Blades 3%
Cards like Copy Land
2.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 28%
- Lightning Greaves 14%
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Wayward Swordtooth
Cards like Prismatic Geoscope
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Firemind Vessel, White Lotus Tile
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Nylea's Presence relevance 0.74 · 79.3% (46 of 58 decks)
- Lush Growth relevance 0.78 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.62 · 72.4% (42 of 58 decks)
- Sphinx of Clear Skies relevance 0.61 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Worldly Counsel relevance 0.62 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Navigator's Compass relevance 0.69 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Tromp the Domains relevance 0.62 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Realmwright relevance 0.59 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Briar Hydra relevance 0.56 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Prismatic Geoscope relevance 0.61 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Grixis Illusionist relevance 0.67 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Jodah's Codex relevance 0.59 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Energybending relevance 0.57 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Together as One relevance 0.56 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Vedalken Plotter relevance 0.61 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Evasive Action relevance 0.49 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Allied Strategies relevance 0.55 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 0.43 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Transcendent Archaic relevance 0.56 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Manaforce Mace relevance 0.58 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Draco relevance 0.55 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Convincing Mirage relevance 0.57 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Uncle's Musings relevance 0.56 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Glinting Creeper relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Sundering Archaic relevance 0.55 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Nishoba Brawler relevance 0.55 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Dream Thrush relevance 0.55 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Woodland Wanderer relevance 0.55 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Slimefoot's Survey relevance 0.52 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Herd Migration relevance 0.53 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Might of Alara relevance 0.55 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 0.42 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Pixie Illusionist relevance 0.48 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.35 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Scion of Draco relevance 0.43 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Rancorous Archaic relevance 0.50 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.43 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Voda Sea Scavenger relevance 0.50 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Exert Influence relevance 0.50 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Gaea's Might relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Arcbound Wanderer relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- The Weatherseed Treaty relevance 0.46 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Infuse with the Elements relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Phantasmal Terrain relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Territorial Maro relevance 0.45 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Sweep the Skies relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Tideshaper Mystic relevance 0.41 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.25 · 69.0% (40 of 58 decks)
- Wildgrowth Archaic relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Swampbenders relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sphinx of Clear Skies relevance 0.61 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Realmwright relevance 0.59 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Briar Hydra relevance 0.56 · 46.6% (27 of 58 decks)
- Grixis Illusionist relevance 0.67 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Vedalken Plotter relevance 0.61 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 0.43 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Transcendent Archaic relevance 0.56 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Draco relevance 0.55 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Glinting Creeper relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Sundering Archaic relevance 0.55 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Nishoba Brawler relevance 0.55 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Dream Thrush relevance 0.55 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Woodland Wanderer relevance 0.55 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Pixie Illusionist relevance 0.48 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.35 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Scion of Draco relevance 0.43 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Rancorous Archaic relevance 0.50 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Voda Sea Scavenger relevance 0.50 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Arcbound Wanderer relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Territorial Maro relevance 0.45 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Tideshaper Mystic relevance 0.41 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.25 · 69.0% (40 of 58 decks)
- Wildgrowth Archaic relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Swampbenders relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Etched Oracle relevance 0.41 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Magnigoth Treefolk relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Stratadon relevance 0.45 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Tek relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Yavimaya Sojourner relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Matca Rioters relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Reef Shaman relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.34 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Llanowar Greenwidow relevance 0.41 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Skyrider Elf relevance 0.37 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Sunbathing Rootwalla relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Aurora Awakener relevance 0.30 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Skittering Cicada relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Wild Nacatl relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Thief of Existence relevance 0.32 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Lunar Avenger relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Skyreach Manta relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Ivy Dancer relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Unseen Walker relevance 0.33 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Territory Culler relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Suncrusher relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Tam, Mindful First-Year relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Weatherseed Elf relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.23 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Omarthis, Ghostfire Initiate relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Rootweaver Druid relevance 0.27 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Navigator's Compass relevance 0.69 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Prismatic Geoscope relevance 0.61 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Jodah's Codex relevance 0.59 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Manaforce Mace relevance 0.58 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Mystic Compass relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Power Armor relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.35 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Lux Artillery relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Solar Array relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.33 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.35 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.32 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Rogue's Gloves relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Jousting Lance relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Opaline Bracers relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Heliophial relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Engineered Explosives relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Elsewhere Flask relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- The Lunar Whale relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Realmbreaker, the Invasion Tree relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Implement of Examination relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Scepter of Celebration relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Clearwater Goblet relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Sword of Sinew and Steel relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Glowcap Lantern relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Nylea's Presence relevance 0.74 · 79.3% (46 of 58 decks)
- Lush Growth relevance 0.78 · 56.9% (33 of 58 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.62 · 72.4% (42 of 58 decks)
- Convincing Mirage relevance 0.57 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 0.42 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- The Weatherseed Treaty relevance 0.46 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Phantasmal Terrain relevance 0.46 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Annex relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.29 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Captivating Glance relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.25 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Ugin's Mastery relevance 0.27 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Path of Annihilation relevance 0.27 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Enigmatic Incarnation relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Estrid's Invocation relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Pattern of Rebirth relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.19 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Case of the Shattered Pact relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.18 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Mystic Subdual relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.13 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Arboreal Alliance relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Mark of Sakiko relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Gift of Strands relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.15 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
All instants (50)
- Worldly Counsel relevance 0.62 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Energybending relevance 0.57 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Evasive Action relevance 0.49 · 43.1% (25 of 58 decks)
- Might of Alara relevance 0.55 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Gaea's Might relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Infuse with the Elements relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Shimmering Mirage relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Mind Bend relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Whirlpool Whelm relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Magical Hack relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Fistful of Force relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Scattering Stroke relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Jinx relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Erratic Mutation relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Spring Cleaning relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Roilmage's Trick relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.20 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Ambush relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.18 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.15 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.15 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Quickchange relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.15 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Hurl into History relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.13 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Forceful Denial relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.13 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.12 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.08 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Pack's Favor relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.13 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Shifting Borders relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.09 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.11 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Lure of Prey relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.10 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Tromp the Domains relevance 0.62 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Together as One relevance 0.56 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Allied Strategies relevance 0.55 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Uncle's Musings relevance 0.56 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Slimefoot's Survey relevance 0.52 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Herd Migration relevance 0.53 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.43 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Exert Influence relevance 0.50 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Sweep the Skies relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Brilliant Spectrum relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Political Trickery relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Gruesome Slaughter relevance 0.39 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Spore Burst relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Ruin in Their Wake relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Research the Deep relevance 0.30 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Revenge of the Hunted relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Wandering Stream relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Snarl Song relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Elemental Spectacle relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Nagging Thoughts relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Path to the Festival relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Woodland Guidance relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.16 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Attune with Aether relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Recross the Paths relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Make Your Own Luck relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Reason // Believe relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Beast Hunt relevance 0.18 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Riding the Dilu Horse relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (13)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.22 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.19 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.18 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.10 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.10 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.09 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.09 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.08 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.06 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Unstable Frontier relevance 0.70 · 44.8% (26 of 58 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.55 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.27 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.21 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Ruins of Oran-Rief relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.19 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.12 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.14 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.13 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.12 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Heart of Yavimaya relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.11 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.08 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.09 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.09 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.08 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Spawning Bed relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Griffin Canyon relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
All lands (50)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.43 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.38 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Corrupted Crossroads relevance 0.36 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.25 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.20 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Tarnation Vista relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.14 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.11 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.11 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.11 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Rainbow Vale relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.10 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.11 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 8.6% (5 of 58 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.09 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.10 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.10 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.10 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.07 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.08 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Public Thoroughfare relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.09 · 6.9% (4 of 58 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.07 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.08 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.08 · 10.3% (6 of 58 decks)
- Grand Coliseum relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.06 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Tendo Ice Bridge relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Undiscovered Paradise relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.09 · 5.2% (3 of 58 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Nael, Avizoa Aeronaut, from 58 real Commander decks.