Lightning Phoenix
Played in 363 Red decks
3030+36+4+2+5+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
14.6% Red
Commanders
Anax, Hardened in the Forge 10.0% of decks
Anax, Hardened in the Forge 10.0% of decks
Gau, Feral Youth 6.9% of decks
Gau, Feral Youth 6.9% of decks
Grenzo, Havoc Raiser 4.8% of decks
Grenzo, Havoc Raiser 4.8% of decks
Subira, Tulzidi Caravanner 6.1% of decks
Subira, Tulzidi Caravanner 6.1% of decks
Herigast, Erupting Nullkite 1.8% of decks
Herigast, Erupting Nullkite 1.8% of decks
Guild Artisan // Amber Gristle O'Maul 15.8% of decks
Guild Artisan // Amber Gristle O'Maul 15.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Flamewake Phoenix 58.4% of decks
Flamewake Phoenix 58.4% of decks
Rekindling Phoenix 42.4% of decks
Rekindling Phoenix 42.4% of decks
Skyfire Phoenix 40.2% of decks
Skyfire Phoenix 40.2% of decks
Phoenix Chick 39.4% of decks
Phoenix Chick 39.4% of decks
Detective's Phoenix 37.5% of decks
Detective's Phoenix 37.5% of decks
Phoenix of Ash 25.1% of decks
Phoenix of Ash 25.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Anax, Hardened in the Forge relevance 2.42 · 10.0% (21 of 209 decks)
- Gau, Feral Youth relevance 2.29 · 6.9% (24 of 348 decks)
- Grenzo, Havoc Raiser relevance 2.06 · 4.8% (23 of 475 decks)
- Subira, Tulzidi Caravanner relevance 1.96 · 6.1% (16 of 261 decks)
- Herigast, Erupting Nullkite relevance 1.81 · 1.8% (47 of 2,658 decks)
- Guild Artisan // Amber Gristle O'Maul relevance 1.20 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Jaya Ballard, Task Mage relevance 1.15 · 2.9% (7 of 241 decks)
- Inti, Seneschal of the Sun relevance 1.12 · 2.0% (9 of 452 decks)
- Vincent, Vengeful Atoner relevance 0.98 · 1.1% (12 of 1,127 decks)
- Firebird, Blazing Ranger relevance 0.93 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Tersa Lightshatter relevance 0.91 · 2.2% (5 of 226 decks)
- Living Lightning, Charged Up relevance 0.84 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Alone relevance 0.83 · 1.4% (6 of 435 decks)
- Umaro, Raging Yeti relevance 0.83 · 3.7% (3 of 82 decks)
- Gadrak, the Crown-Scourge relevance 0.76 · 2.8% (3 of 107 decks)
- Hazoret the Fervent relevance 0.74 · 1.7% (4 of 237 decks)
- Hazoret, Godseeker relevance 0.74 · 1.7% (4 of 240 decks)
- Lightning, Security Sergeant relevance 0.72 · 5.0% (2 of 40 decks)
- Squee, the Immortal relevance 0.70 · 1.1% (5 of 450 decks)
- Popular Entertainer // Amber Gristle O'Maul relevance 0.66 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Feldon, Ronom Excavator relevance 0.64 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Anep, Vizier of Hazoret relevance 0.63 · 3.2% (2 of 62 decks)
- Cait Sith, Fortune Teller relevance 0.63 · 1.6% (3 of 186 decks)
- Loki Laufeyson relevance 0.62 · 3.0% (2 of 66 decks)
- Sabin, Master Monk relevance 0.60 · 1.4% (3 of 212 decks)
- Casey Jones, Vigilante relevance 0.58 · 1.3% (3 of 229 decks)
- Matoc, Lavamancer relevance 0.56 · 1.2% (3 of 244 decks)
- Tarox Bladewing relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Gut, True Soul Zealot // Popular Entertainer relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Flamewake Phoenix relevance 3.15 · 58.4% (212 of 363 decks)
- Rekindling Phoenix relevance 2.19 · 42.4% (154 of 363 decks)
- Skyfire Phoenix relevance 2.15 · 40.2% (146 of 363 decks)
- Phoenix Chick relevance 1.90 · 39.4% (143 of 363 decks)
- Detective's Phoenix relevance 1.75 · 37.5% (136 of 363 decks)
- Phoenix of Ash relevance 1.69 · 25.1% (91 of 363 decks)
- Bloodfeather Phoenix relevance 1.59 · 24.0% (87 of 363 decks)
- Lamplight Phoenix relevance 1.43 · 21.2% (77 of 363 decks)
- Chandra's Phoenix relevance 1.05 · 20.9% (76 of 363 decks)
- Squee, Goblin Nabob relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (69 of 363 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.67 · 30.9% (112 of 363 decks)
- Loyal Apprentice relevance 0.58 · 19.3% (70 of 363 decks)
- Squee, the Immortal relevance 0.54 · 15.2% (55 of 363 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (52 of 363 decks)
- Tersa Lightshatter relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (41 of 363 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (44 of 363 decks)
- Electric Revelation relevance 0.47 · 11.6% (42 of 363 decks)
- Inti, Seneschal of the Sun relevance 0.43 · 14.0% (51 of 363 decks)
- Enduring Courage relevance 0.43 · 14.0% (51 of 363 decks)
- Hazoret's Monument relevance 0.42 · 21.5% (78 of 363 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (33 of 363 decks)
- Ox of Agonas relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (33 of 363 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 0.41 · 8.5% (31 of 363 decks)
- Sabin, Master Monk relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (24 of 363 decks)
- Marauding Mako relevance 0.40 · 9.4% (34 of 363 decks)
- Weaver of Lightning relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (21 of 363 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (34 of 363 decks)
- Kari Zev, Skyship Raider relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (31 of 363 decks)
- Flayer of the Hatebound relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (22 of 363 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.37 · 22.9% (83 of 363 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Flamewake Phoenix relevance 3.15 · 58.4% (212 of 363 decks)
- Rekindling Phoenix relevance 2.19 · 42.4% (154 of 363 decks)
- Skyfire Phoenix relevance 2.15 · 40.2% (146 of 363 decks)
- Phoenix Chick relevance 1.90 · 39.4% (143 of 363 decks)
- Detective's Phoenix relevance 1.75 · 37.5% (136 of 363 decks)
- Phoenix of Ash relevance 1.69 · 25.1% (91 of 363 decks)
- Bloodfeather Phoenix relevance 1.59 · 24.0% (87 of 363 decks)
- Lamplight Phoenix relevance 1.43 · 21.2% (77 of 363 decks)
- Chandra's Phoenix relevance 1.05 · 20.9% (76 of 363 decks)
- Squee, Goblin Nabob relevance 0.71 · 19.0% (69 of 363 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.67 · 30.9% (112 of 363 decks)
- Loyal Apprentice relevance 0.58 · 19.3% (70 of 363 decks)
- Squee, the Immortal relevance 0.54 · 15.2% (55 of 363 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (52 of 363 decks)
- Tersa Lightshatter relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (41 of 363 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (44 of 363 decks)
- Inti, Seneschal of the Sun relevance 0.43 · 14.0% (51 of 363 decks)
- Enduring Courage relevance 0.43 · 14.0% (51 of 363 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (33 of 363 decks)
- Ox of Agonas relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (33 of 363 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 0.41 · 8.5% (31 of 363 decks)
- Sabin, Master Monk relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (24 of 363 decks)
- Marauding Mako relevance 0.40 · 9.4% (34 of 363 decks)
- Weaver of Lightning relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (21 of 363 decks)
- Kari Zev, Skyship Raider relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (31 of 363 decks)
- Flayer of the Hatebound relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (22 of 363 decks)
- Feldon of the Third Path relevance 0.37 · 11.8% (43 of 363 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.37 · 19.6% (71 of 363 decks)
- Hanweir Garrison relevance 0.35 · 8.0% (29 of 363 decks)
- Artisan of Kozilek relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (28 of 363 decks)
- Hideous Taskmaster relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (28 of 363 decks)
- Ball Lightning relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (23 of 363 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (23 of 363 decks)
- Runaway Steam-Kin relevance 0.33 · 17.6% (64 of 363 decks)
- Jaya's Phoenix relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (23 of 363 decks)
- Blazing Rootwalla relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (21 of 363 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Hazoret's Monument relevance 0.42 · 21.5% (78 of 363 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (34 of 363 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.35 · 11.0% (40 of 363 decks)
- Fire Diamond relevance 0.33 · 20.1% (73 of 363 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Advanced Reconstruction relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (23 of 363 decks)
- Break Through the Line relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (22 of 363 decks)
All instants (5)
- Electric Revelation relevance 0.47 · 11.6% (42 of 363 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.37 · 22.9% (83 of 363 decks)
- Punishing Fire relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (23 of 363 decks)
- Laughing Mad relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (35 of 363 decks)
- Fiery Temper relevance 0.33 · 7.2% (26 of 363 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.33 · 18.2% (66 of 363 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.33 · 19.8% (72 of 363 decks)
All lands (1)
- Brass's Tunnel-Grinder // Tecutlan, the Searing Rift relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (41 of 363 decks)
EDH data for Lightning Phoenix: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 363 real decks.



















































