Stoic Ephemera
Played in 16 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
5.5% Bant
- Orzhov 150 · 51.5%
- White 52 · 17.9%
- Azorius 35 · 12.0%
- Bant 16 · 5.5%
- Boros 12 · 4.1%
- Abzan 11 · 3.8%
- Other (7) 15 · 5.2%
Most Relevant
All most relevant (26)
- Portcullis Vine relevance 3.13 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.49 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 2.39 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 2.35 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 2.27 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Jungle Barrier relevance 2.20 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.20 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.20 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.16 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 2.13 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Carven Caryatid relevance 2.12 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 2.06 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.06 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.04 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.02 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.92 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.92 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.86 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.82 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.75 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.73 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.72 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.62 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.61 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.60 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.59 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Portcullis Vine relevance 3.13 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 2.49 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 2.35 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 2.27 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Jungle Barrier relevance 2.20 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.20 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.20 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 2.16 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 2.13 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Carven Caryatid relevance 2.12 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 2.06 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 2.06 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.04 · 68.8% (11 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 2.02 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.92 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.86 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.75 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.73 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.72 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.62 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.61 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.60 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Assault Formation relevance 2.39 · 75.0% (12 of 16 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.92 · 62.5% (10 of 16 decks)
All instants (1)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.82 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.59 · 50.0% (8 of 16 decks)
EDH data for Stoic Ephemera: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16 real decks.