Stoic Ephemera
Played in 149 Orzhov decks
130+34+1+3+11+1+
Color Identity Spread
51.6% Orzhov
-
Orzhov 149 · 51.6%
-
White 52 · 18.0%
-
Azorius 34 · 11.8%
-
Bant 16 · 5.5%
-
Boros 12 · 4.2%
-
Abzan 11 · 3.8%
- Other (7) 15 · 5.2%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant 85.2% of decks
Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant 85.2% of decks
Lupine Prototype 79.9% of decks
Lupine Prototype 79.9% of decks
Rotting Regisaur 81.9% of decks
Rotting Regisaur 81.9% of decks
Relic Golem 75.2% of decks
Relic Golem 75.2% of decks
Rot-Curse Rakshasa 77.9% of decks
Rot-Curse Rakshasa 77.9% of decks
Nyxathid 71.8% of decks
Nyxathid 71.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Abigale, Eloquent First-Year relevance 3.75 · 3.6% (134 of 3,758 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 3.74 · 85.2% (127 of 149 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 3.60 · 79.9% (119 of 149 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 3.56 · 81.9% (122 of 149 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 3.46 · 75.2% (112 of 149 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 3.38 · 77.9% (116 of 149 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 3.27 · 71.8% (107 of 149 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 3.26 · 73.2% (109 of 149 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 3.19 · 69.1% (103 of 149 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 2.95 · 65.1% (97 of 149 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 2.93 · 61.1% (91 of 149 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.80 · 57.7% (86 of 149 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 2.69 · 49.7% (74 of 149 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.47 · 52.3% (78 of 149 decks)
- Waning Wurm relevance 2.43 · 49.0% (73 of 149 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 2.29 · 45.6% (68 of 149 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 2.21 · 37.6% (56 of 149 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 2.14 · 50.3% (75 of 149 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.05 · 43.6% (65 of 149 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.98 · 70.5% (105 of 149 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 1.90 · 53.0% (79 of 149 decks)
- Personify relevance 1.81 · 48.3% (72 of 149 decks)
- Alms Beast relevance 1.80 · 27.5% (41 of 149 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.78 · 39.6% (59 of 149 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 1.77 · 34.9% (52 of 149 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 1.73 · 43.6% (65 of 149 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.73 · 32.2% (48 of 149 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.70 · 51.0% (76 of 149 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 1.63 · 61.1% (91 of 149 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.61 · 40.3% (60 of 149 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.58 · 49.7% (74 of 149 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 3.74 · 85.2% (127 of 149 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 3.60 · 79.9% (119 of 149 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 3.56 · 81.9% (122 of 149 decks)
- Relic Golem relevance 3.46 · 75.2% (112 of 149 decks)
- Rot-Curse Rakshasa relevance 3.38 · 77.9% (116 of 149 decks)
- Nyxathid relevance 3.27 · 71.8% (107 of 149 decks)
- Shakedown Heavy relevance 3.26 · 73.2% (109 of 149 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 3.19 · 69.1% (103 of 149 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 2.95 · 65.1% (97 of 149 decks)
- Woolly Razorback relevance 2.93 · 61.1% (91 of 149 decks)
- Egon, God of Death // Throne of Death relevance 2.80 · 57.7% (86 of 149 decks)
- Flesh Reaver relevance 2.69 · 49.7% (74 of 149 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 2.47 · 52.3% (78 of 149 decks)
- Waning Wurm relevance 2.43 · 49.0% (73 of 149 decks)
- Plague Reaver relevance 2.29 · 45.6% (68 of 149 decks)
- Master of the Feast relevance 2.21 · 37.6% (56 of 149 decks)
- Xu-Ifit, Osteoharmonist relevance 2.14 · 50.3% (75 of 149 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 2.05 · 43.6% (65 of 149 decks)
- Alms Beast relevance 1.80 · 27.5% (41 of 149 decks)
- Hunted Bonebrute relevance 1.78 · 39.6% (59 of 149 decks)
- Archfiend of the Dross relevance 1.77 · 34.9% (52 of 149 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 1.73 · 43.6% (65 of 149 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 1.73 · 32.2% (48 of 149 decks)
- Desecration Demon relevance 1.57 · 29.5% (44 of 149 decks)
- Yathan Tombguard relevance 1.50 · 36.2% (54 of 149 decks)
- Devouring Sugarmaw // Have for Dinner relevance 1.35 · 22.8% (34 of 149 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 1.22 · 36.9% (55 of 149 decks)
- Clackbridge Troll relevance 1.21 · 26.2% (39 of 149 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 1.14 · 32.2% (48 of 149 decks)
- Sunset Saboteur relevance 1.10 · 16.8% (25 of 149 decks)
- Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 1.08 · 32.2% (48 of 149 decks)
- Desecration Elemental relevance 1.05 · 18.1% (27 of 149 decks)
- Gilraen, Dúnedain Protector relevance 0.99 · 24.2% (36 of 149 decks)
- Wanted Scoundrels relevance 0.98 · 15.4% (23 of 149 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 1.58 · 49.7% (74 of 149 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 1.90 · 53.0% (79 of 149 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 1.61 · 40.3% (60 of 149 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 1.24 · 40.9% (61 of 149 decks)
All instants (11)
- Cloudshift relevance 1.98 · 70.5% (105 of 149 decks)
- Personify relevance 1.81 · 48.3% (72 of 149 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 1.70 · 51.0% (76 of 149 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 1.63 · 61.1% (91 of 149 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 1.53 · 49.0% (73 of 149 decks)
- Justiciar's Portal relevance 1.50 · 33.6% (50 of 149 decks)
- Acrobatic Maneuver relevance 1.48 · 34.2% (51 of 149 decks)
- Scrollshift relevance 1.22 · 28.9% (43 of 149 decks)
- Getaway Glamer relevance 1.22 · 28.9% (43 of 149 decks)
- Otherworldly Journey relevance 1.12 · 23.5% (35 of 149 decks)
- Slip On the Ring relevance 1.10 · 27.5% (41 of 149 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Damning Verdict relevance 1.00 · 27.5% (41 of 149 decks)
EDH data for Stoic Ephemera: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 149 real decks.
































