Bred for the Hunt
Played in 3,205 Sultai decks
2030+27+5+9+6+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
8.4% Sultai
Commanders
Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker 36.4% of decks
Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker 36.4% of decks
Vorosh, the Hunter 34.7% of decks
Vorosh, the Hunter 34.7% of decks
The Wise Mothman 4.9% of decks
The Wise Mothman 4.9% of decks
Zaxara, the Exemplary 3.2% of decks
Zaxara, the Exemplary 3.2% of decks
Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 32.0% of decks
Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Esior, Wardwing Familiar 32.0% of decks
The Mimeoplasm 3.5% of decks
The Mimeoplasm 3.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Hardened Scales 64.4% of decks
Hardened Scales 64.4% of decks
Inspiring Call 56.4% of decks
Inspiring Call 56.4% of decks
Corpsejack Menace 53.4% of decks
Corpsejack Menace 53.4% of decks
Thrummingbird 39.8% of decks
Thrummingbird 39.8% of decks
Branching Evolution 48.0% of decks
Branching Evolution 48.0% of decks
Kami of Whispered Hopes 39.4% of decks
Kami of Whispered Hopes 39.4% of decks
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces
0.81| 6.5%
$18.72 · €11.70$31.95 · €31.67
That's every commander.
All commanders (20)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 4.18 · 36.4% (824 of 2,265 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 2.88 · 34.7% (109 of 314 decks)
- The Wise Mothman relevance 2.00 · 4.9% (1,148 of 23,465 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 1.33 · 3.2% (376 of 11,743 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 1.32 · 32.0% (8 of 25 decks)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 1.15 · 3.5% (130 of 3,748 decks)
- Volrath, the Shapestealer relevance 1.02 · 3.5% (72 of 2,055 decks)
- Felix Five-Boots relevance 0.92 · 2.8% (79 of 2,772 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.81 · 11.3% (6 of 53 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.81 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.66 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Mimeoplasm, Revered One relevance 0.63 · 2.3% (30 of 1,308 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.55 · 1.5% (59 of 4,064 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.55 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 0.49 · 1.0% (100 of 9,553 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.43 · 64.4% (2,064 of 3,205 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.33 · 56.4% (1,807 of 3,205 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.27 · 53.4% (1,711 of 3,205 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 1.19 · 39.8% (1,274 of 3,205 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 1.10 · 48.0% (1,537 of 3,205 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.09 · 39.4% (1,263 of 3,205 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 1.09 · 42.0% (1,346 of 3,205 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 1.04 · 31.7% (1,015 of 3,205 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.01 · 31.1% (996 of 3,205 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.98 · 30.8% (986 of 3,205 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.96 · 35.6% (1,142 of 3,205 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.90 · 28.7% (920 of 3,205 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.89 · 23.8% (763 of 3,205 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (1,153 of 3,205 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.84 · 22.2% (713 of 3,205 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (801 of 3,205 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.80 · 21.7% (697 of 3,205 decks)
- Vexing Radgull relevance 0.75 · 29.0% (930 of 3,205 decks)
- Marcus, Mutant Mayor relevance 0.73 · 23.8% (762 of 3,205 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.72 · 24.1% (773 of 3,205 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.72 · 26.2% (839 of 3,205 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (529 of 3,205 decks)
- Atomize relevance 0.70 · 27.4% (878 of 3,205 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.69 · 26.5% (849 of 3,205 decks)
- Glowing One relevance 0.69 · 27.5% (882 of 3,205 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.68 · 22.0% (706 of 3,205 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.68 · 24.7% (791 of 3,205 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.66 · 21.5% (689 of 3,205 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.66 · 16.7% (535 of 3,205 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.66 · 23.4% (750 of 3,205 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.27 · 53.4% (1,711 of 3,205 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 1.19 · 39.8% (1,274 of 3,205 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 1.09 · 39.4% (1,263 of 3,205 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 1.09 · 42.0% (1,346 of 3,205 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.01 · 31.1% (996 of 3,205 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.98 · 30.8% (986 of 3,205 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.96 · 35.6% (1,142 of 3,205 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.90 · 28.7% (920 of 3,205 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.80 · 21.7% (697 of 3,205 decks)
- Vexing Radgull relevance 0.75 · 29.0% (930 of 3,205 decks)
- Marcus, Mutant Mayor relevance 0.73 · 23.8% (762 of 3,205 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.72 · 16.5% (529 of 3,205 decks)
- Glowing One relevance 0.69 · 27.5% (882 of 3,205 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.68 · 22.0% (706 of 3,205 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.68 · 24.7% (791 of 3,205 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.66 · 23.4% (750 of 3,205 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.65 · 19.3% (618 of 3,205 decks)
- Infesting Radroach relevance 0.62 · 23.2% (744 of 3,205 decks)
- Screeching Scorchbeast relevance 0.62 · 23.9% (766 of 3,205 decks)
- Mirelurk Queen relevance 0.60 · 24.9% (798 of 3,205 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.60 · 18.7% (598 of 3,205 decks)
- The Master, Transcendent relevance 0.60 · 22.7% (726 of 3,205 decks)
- Feral Ghoul relevance 0.56 · 20.8% (666 of 3,205 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.56 · 12.6% (405 of 3,205 decks)
- Bloatfly Swarm relevance 0.56 · 20.0% (641 of 3,205 decks)
- Slither Blade relevance 0.56 · 15.7% (502 of 3,205 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.54 · 23.6% (757 of 3,205 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.84 · 22.2% (713 of 3,205 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.72 · 24.1% (773 of 3,205 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.59 · 36.8% (1,178 of 3,205 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 0.58 · 23.9% (767 of 3,205 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.58 · 16.6% (532 of 3,205 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.43 · 64.4% (2,064 of 3,205 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 1.10 · 48.0% (1,537 of 3,205 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 1.04 · 31.7% (1,015 of 3,205 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (801 of 3,205 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.69 · 26.5% (849 of 3,205 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.66 · 21.5% (689 of 3,205 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.66 · 16.7% (535 of 3,205 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.58 · 17.3% (553 of 3,205 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.56 · 14.2% (454 of 3,205 decks)
All instants (6)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.33 · 56.4% (1,807 of 3,205 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (1,153 of 3,205 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.72 · 26.2% (839 of 3,205 decks)
- Atomize relevance 0.70 · 27.4% (878 of 3,205 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.59 · 18.7% (599 of 3,205 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.55 · 35.1% (1,126 of 3,205 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.89 · 23.8% (763 of 3,205 decks)
- Nuclear Fallout relevance 0.65 · 27.1% (870 of 3,205 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.70 · 23.0% (736 of 3,205 decks)
EDH data for Bred for the Hunt: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,205 real decks.






















































