Briarhorn
Played in 158 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (8)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 3.76 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Edgar, Moonlit Sovereign relevance 1.37 · 2.6% (7 of 270 decks)
- Iwamori of the Open Fist relevance 0.70 · 2.4% (2 of 85 decks)
- Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.56 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.48 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Ever Adaptable relevance 0.39 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Master Chef // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.36 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sandstalker Moloch relevance 1.59 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 1.58 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 1.57 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Wandering Troubadour relevance 1.53 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Spirit of the Hunt relevance 1.53 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Ellywick Tumblestrum relevance 1.53 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 1.47 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Find the Path relevance 1.45 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Undermountain Adventurer relevance 1.42 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 1.42 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Intrepid Outlander relevance 1.40 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 1.36 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 1.34 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Pack Guardian relevance 1.32 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 1.22 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 1.19 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 1.09 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 1.05 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Dungeon Map relevance 1.04 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 1.02 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.98 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.90 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Slippery Bogbonder relevance 0.83 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.83 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Haze Frog relevance 0.82 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.82 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.81 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.80 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 0.72 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.70 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Sandstalker Moloch relevance 1.59 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 1.58 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 1.57 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Wandering Troubadour relevance 1.53 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Spirit of the Hunt relevance 1.53 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 1.47 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Undermountain Adventurer relevance 1.42 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Intrepid Outlander relevance 1.40 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 1.36 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 1.34 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Pack Guardian relevance 1.32 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 1.22 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 1.19 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 1.09 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 1.02 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.90 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Slippery Bogbonder relevance 0.83 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.83 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Haze Frog relevance 0.82 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 0.82 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.81 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.80 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.70 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.70 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.68 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.64 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.63 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Caller of the Claw relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Glademuse relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.60 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Snapping Sailback relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.52 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.49 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.48 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Dungeon Map relevance 1.04 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Find the Path relevance 1.45 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 0.72 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.59 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.50 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.48 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
All instants (2)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.53 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 1.42 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.98 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.49 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Ellywick Tumblestrum relevance 1.53 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 1.05 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Dungeon Descent relevance 1.35 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
EDH data for Briarhorn: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 158 real decks.