Cards like Metallic Mimic
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
6.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Keeper of Fables, Oakhame Adversary, Ohran Viper
Cards like Welcoming Vampire
5.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Anthem of Champions
4.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Muraganda Petroglyphs
Cards like Mother Bear
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Mother Bear 23%
- Bearscape 14%
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
3.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Medusa, Inhuman Queen, Steelburr Champion
Cards like Vanquisher's Banner
7.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Enduring Innocence
3.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Selesnya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 39%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 36%
- Elvish Mystic 28%
- Fyndhorn Elves 11%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Golden Hind, Steward of Valeron, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Beast Within
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 37%
- Generous Gift 33%
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 39%
- Cultivate 37%
- Kodama's Reach 21%
- Shared Roots 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Explosive Vegetation 2%
- Map the Wastes 2%
- Migration Path 2%
Other options: They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Roamer's Routine, Harvest Season, Traverse the Outlands, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Slimefoot's Survey, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, Boundless Realms, New Generation's Technique, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 28%
- Lightning Greaves 24%
Cards like Rally the Ranks
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like The Earth Crystal
2.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 28%
- Three Visits 20%
- Skyshroud Claim 5%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Banner of Kinship
6.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Inspiring Call
2.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Requisition Raid
3.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
All top picks (50)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.28 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.28 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Rally the Ranks relevance 0.25 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.26 · 18.9% (24 of 127 decks)
- Faithful Watchdog relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.25 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Torens, Fist of the Angels relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (17 of 127 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (17 of 127 decks)
- Sovereign Okinec Ahau relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.24 · 25.2% (32 of 127 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.24 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.28 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Little Bear relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Jacked Rabbit relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.24 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.23 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 24.4% (31 of 127 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.26 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- King Darien XLVIII relevance 0.21 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (34 of 127 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (34 of 127 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Striped Bears relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.28 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.28 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Faithful Watchdog relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Adaptive Automaton relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Torens, Fist of the Angels relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (17 of 127 decks)
- Sovereign Okinec Ahau relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.24 · 25.2% (32 of 127 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.24 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Little Bear relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Jacked Rabbit relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.23 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- King Darien XLVIII relevance 0.21 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (34 of 127 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Botanical Brawler relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Striped Bears relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.22 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Enduring Innocence relevance 0.21 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
- Welcoming Vampire relevance 0.21 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.23 · 25.2% (32 of 127 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Spider-Ham, Peter Porker relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 0.23 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Beorn the Fierce relevance 0.22 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Maja, Bretagard Protector relevance 0.21 · 31.5% (40 of 127 decks)
- Druid's Familiar relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Trostani Discordant relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Metallic Mimic relevance 0.21 · 32.3% (41 of 127 decks)
- Adeline, Resplendent Cathar relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Pale Bears relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- River Bear relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Cadira, Caller of the Small relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 0.25 · 13.4% (17 of 127 decks)
All artifacts (44)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.24 · 24.4% (31 of 127 decks)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.25 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.20 · 35.4% (45 of 127 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.22 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Oketra's Monument relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.25 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.16 · 47.2% (60 of 127 decks)
- White Lotus Tile relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Spear of Heliod relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.11 · 59.8% (76 of 127 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Horn of Valhalla // Ysgard's Call relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Orcrist, Goblin-cleaver relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Stuffed Bear relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Symmetry Matrix relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Selesnya Locket relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- The Arkenstone // Seek the Heart relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Lumen-Class Frigate relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 79.5% (101 of 127 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Rally the Ranks relevance 0.25 · 23.6% (30 of 127 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.24 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.22 · 27.6% (35 of 127 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.24 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Bearscape relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.21 · 32.3% (41 of 127 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.26 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.21 · 31.5% (40 of 127 decks)
- Reverence relevance 0.19 · 40.9% (52 of 127 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Paladin Class relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Radiant Destiny relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.20 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.20 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.20 · 31.5% (40 of 127 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Caretaker's Talent relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.23 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Champions from Beyond relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.17 · 41.7% (53 of 127 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Words of Wilding relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.26 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.26 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.26 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Dictate of Heliod relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Steely Resolve relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
All instants (50)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.26 · 18.9% (24 of 127 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.25 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (29 of 127 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (17 of 127 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.28 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (34 of 127 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.22 · 27.6% (35 of 127 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.26 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.21 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.25 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.18 · 35.4% (45 of 127 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.18 · 37.0% (47 of 127 decks)
- Call the Coppercoats relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- And They Shall Know No Fear relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Will of the Mardu relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Awaken the Bear relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.13 · 48.0% (61 of 127 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Your Temple Is Under Attack relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Signature Slam relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.10 · 61.4% (78 of 127 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Farewell relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.25 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.26 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.22 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (12 of 127 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.23 · 21.3% (27 of 127 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.23 · 22.0% (28 of 127 decks)
- Grizzly Fate relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.26 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Savage Swipe relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Tempt with Bunnies relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 38.6% (49 of 127 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.18 · 37.0% (47 of 127 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.19 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Solar Tide relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Increasing Devotion relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Storm of Souls relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- United Front relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Finale of Glory relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Kamahl's Summons relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- White Sun's Twilight relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Season of the Burrow relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Hour of Reckoning relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Basri Ket relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Ajani, Adversary of Tyrants relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Moag // Bloomwielder Dryads relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Invasion of Gobakhan // Lightshield Array relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
All utility lands (49)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.27 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.29 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (23 of 127 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.29 · 8.7% (11 of 127 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.24 · 19.7% (25 of 127 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.24 · 16.5% (21 of 127 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 15.7% (20 of 127 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.21 · 29.1% (37 of 127 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.25 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (9 of 127 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.19 · 36.2% (46 of 127 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.19 · 33.1% (42 of 127 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.18 · 36.2% (46 of 127 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
All lands (50)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.28 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.26 · 18.9% (24 of 127 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.24 · 24.4% (31 of 127 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.27 · 12.6% (16 of 127 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (26 of 127 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.22 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.22 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.26 · 13.4% (17 of 127 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.22 · 27.6% (35 of 127 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.27 · 11.8% (15 of 127 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.22 · 24.4% (31 of 127 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (13 of 127 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.27 · 11.0% (14 of 127 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 33.9% (43 of 127 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.22 · 26.0% (33 of 127 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (8 of 127 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.19 · 34.6% (44 of 127 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (10 of 127 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.20 · 28.3% (36 of 127 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 127 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.18 · 37.0% (47 of 127 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (6 of 127 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.14 · 49.6% (63 of 127 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.14 · 45.7% (58 of 127 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 127 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.12 · 54.3% (69 of 127 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.10 · 59.8% (76 of 127 decks)
- Elfhame Palace relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 127 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.09 · 63.0% (80 of 127 decks)
- Saltcrusted Steppe relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (3 of 127 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kudo, King Among Bears, from 127 real Commander decks.