Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 92%
- Dream Stalker 33%
Other options: Yarok's Wavecrasher, Stickytongue Sentinel, Invasive Species, Keymaster Rogue, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Tireless Tracker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 58%
- Elvish Mystic 45%
- Fyndhorn Elves 45%
- Llanowar Tribe 3%
- Boreal Druid 2%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Eternal Witness
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Eldritch Evolution
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eldritch Evolution 30%
- Neoform 30%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Peregrine Drake
18× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elvish Visionary
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Arbor Elf
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 15%
- Quirion Ranger 13%
- Scryb Ranger 7%
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 37%
- Pongify 35%
Cards like Mystic Snake
7.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Snake 17%
- Frilled Mystic 10%
- Sister of Silence 3%
Other options: Voracious Greatshark, Voidmage Husher
Cards like Essence Flux
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Prosperous Innkeeper
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Virulent Emissary, Social Climber, Greenhouse Propagator
Cards like Trophy Mage
8.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Coiling Oracle
7.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 52%
- Risen Reef 5%
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 22%
- Mystic Remora 22%
Cards like Memory Lapse
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Priest of Titania
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
9.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Volatile Stormdrake
7.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Farhaven Elf
5.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Primeval Herald, Simulacrum Shaper, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger, Wild Wanderer
Cards like Swan Song
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swan Song 28%
- Strix Serenade 5%
Cards like Beast Whisperer
6.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
4.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.42 · 88.3% (53 of 60 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.39 · 91.7% (55 of 60 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.43 · 76.7% (46 of 60 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.49 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.48 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.41 · 73.3% (44 of 60 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.50 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.44 · 63.3% (38 of 60 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.49 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.47 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.49 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.49 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.48 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.48 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.46 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.39 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.45 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.47 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.36 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.41 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.43 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.44 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.35 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Graf Mole relevance 0.47 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 0.46 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.46 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.45 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.43 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.44 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.39 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.33 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.42 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.35 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.40 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- The Third Doctor relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.27 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.36 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.36 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.33 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.35 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.32 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.42 · 88.3% (53 of 60 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.39 · 91.7% (55 of 60 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.43 · 76.7% (46 of 60 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.48 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.41 · 73.3% (44 of 60 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.50 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.44 · 63.3% (38 of 60 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.49 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.49 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.49 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.48 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.48 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.39 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.45 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.47 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.36 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.41 · 40.0% (24 of 60 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.43 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.35 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Graf Mole relevance 0.47 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 0.46 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.46 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.33 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.35 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- The Third Doctor relevance 0.42 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.27 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.33 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.35 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.32 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.27 · 45.0% (27 of 60 decks)
- Lonis, Genetics Expert relevance 0.36 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.35 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Briarbridge Patrol relevance 0.39 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.34 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.27 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.29 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.33 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.31 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.34 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.17 · 80.0% (48 of 60 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.28 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Briarbridge Tracker relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar relevance 0.35 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.49 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.47 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.42 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.39 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.36 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.35 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.27 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Mirrormind Crown relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.13 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.12 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.10 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Booby Trap relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Evolving Door relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Skyclave Pick-Axe relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.10 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Pithing Needle relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Mirror of Life Trapping relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.09 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.44 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.45 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.40 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.36 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.27 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Ongoing Investigation relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- A Realm Reborn relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.17 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Weirding Wood relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.18 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Shared Fate relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Zoetic Glyph relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Fae Offering relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Aid from the Cowl relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Elfhame Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.08 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.08 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Night of the Sweets' Revenge relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All instants (50)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.44 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.39 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.33 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.34 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.37 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.27 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.31 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.36 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.23 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.18 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.17 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Hinder relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.16 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.11 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.12 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.14 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.46 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.43 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.40 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.24 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.22 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Temporal Spring relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.16 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.11 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.11 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Gleeful Sabotage relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Gone Missing relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Stolen Goods relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Survivors' Bond relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Press for Answers relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.17 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.24 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.43 · 46.7% (28 of 60 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.26 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.29 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.19 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.24 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.19 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.20 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.17 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.15 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.16 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.11 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.09 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
All lands (50)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.30 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.23 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.15 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.17 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.15 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.13 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.14 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.12 · 48.3% (29 of 60 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.16 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.09 · 63.3% (38 of 60 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.06 · 80.0% (48 of 60 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.11 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.10 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.07 · 58.3% (35 of 60 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (30 of 60 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.09 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.09 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.09 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lonis, Cryptozoologist, from 60 real Commander decks.