Cards like Quakestrider Ceratops
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
91% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
5.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Quakestrider Ceratops 81%
- Gigantosaurus 79%
- Leatherback Baloth 73%
- Vorstclaw 63%
- Ancient Brontodon 56%
- Primordial Wurm 55%
- Enormous Baloth 22%
- Colossapede 19%
- Grizzled Outrider 11%
- Axebane Stag 10%
- Cowl Prowler 8%
- Barbtooth Wurm 7%
- Hollowhenge Beast 5%
- Kindercatch 4%
- Canopy Gorger 4%
- Broodhunter Wurm 4%
- Scaled Wurm 3%
- Tusked Colossodon 3%
- Murasa Brute 3%
- Vastwood Gorger 3%
- Trained Armodon 3%
- Wild Ceratok 3%
- Golden Bear 2%
- Feral Krushok 2%
- Silverback Ape 2%
- Axebane Beast 2%
- Thornhide Wolves 2%
- Gnarled Mass 2%
- Spined Karok 2%
- Nettle Swine 2%
- Pheres-Band Centaurs 1%
- Durkwood Boars 1%
Other options: Blanchwood Treefolk, Order of the Sacred Bell, Moss Monster, Plated Wurm, Ironroot Treefolk, Southern Elephant, Nema Siltlurker
Cards like Kalonian Tusker
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
81% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
3.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Kalonian Tusker 68%
- Alpine Grizzly 61%
- Terrain Elemental 53%
- Orazca Frillback 49%
- Jibbirik Omnivore 43%
- Swordwise Centaur 40%
- Rumbling Baloth 17%
- Colossodon Yearling 7%
- Cylian Elf 6%
- Runeclaw Bear 6%
- Ferocious Zheng 5%
- Bear Cub 4%
- Balduvian Bears 4%
- Forest Bear 3%
- Barbary Apes 1%
Other options: Trained Jackal
Cards like Devilthorn Fox
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
3.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Devilthorn Fox 46%
- Raptor Companion 43%
- Savai Sabertooth 32%
- Elite Vanguard 32%
- Oreskos Swiftclaw 29%
- Grizzled Leotau 23%
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword 21%
- Expedition Envoy 20%
- Prowling Caracal 20%
- Knight of New Benalia 15%
- Armored Warhorse 5%
- Kyoshi Warrior Guard 5%
- Yoked Ox 4%
- Ageless Guardian 3%
- Silvercoat Lion 3%
- Staunch Shieldmate 3%
- Sanctuary Cat 3%
- Tasseled Dromedary 2%
- Traveling Philosopher 1%
- Bastion Enforcer 1%
- Those Who Serve 1%
- Valiant Guard 1%
Other options: Pearled Unicorn, Keepers of the Faith, Squire
Cards like Muraganda Petroglyphs
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Terrian, World Tyrant
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
2.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Selesnya decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.93 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 60%
- Cultivate 56%
- Kodama's Reach 41%
- Shared Roots 7%
- Migration Path 4%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Explosive Vegetation 3%
Other options: Grow from the Ashes, New Generation's Technique, Roamer's Routine, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Primal Growth, Beneath the Sands, Far Wanderings, They Went This Way, Map the Wastes, Untamed Wilds, Terramorph, Deep Reconnaissance, Peregrination, Path to the Festival, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery
Cards like Indomitable Ancients
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Indomitable Ancients 30%
- Armored Wolf-Rider 15%
- Kami of Old Stone 8%
- Looming Altisaur 4%
- Old Ghastbark 2%
- Great-Horn Krushok 1%
Other options: Ironclad Krovod, Dutiful Servants, Siege Mastodon, Great Hart, Silent Artisan, Pillarfield Ox, Imperial Outrider
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 46%
- Three Visits 32%
- Skyshroud Claim 11%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Beast Within
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 41%
- Generous Gift 32%
Cards like Glass Golem
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Bronze Sable, Alpha Myr, Phyrexian Hulk, Hexplate Golem, Field Creeper, Razorfield Thresher, Obsianus Golem, Stone Golem, Stonework Puma, Wicker Witch, Gilded Sentinel, Omega Myr, Sliver Construct
Cards like Elemental Bond
3.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 24%
- Swiftfoot Boots 22%
Cards like Fog
2.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Fog 30%
- Holy Day 3%
- Moment's Peace 1%
Other options: Lull, Druid's Deliverance, Angelsong, Ethereal Haze, Winds of Qal Sisma, Commencement of Festivities, Safe Passage, Haze of Pollen, Root Snare, Defend the Hearth, Pause for Reflection, Eerie Interference, Thwart the Enemy, Terrifying Presence, Harmless Assault, Chameleon Blur, Divine Light, Tanglesap, Serene Sunset, Forfend, Vine Snare
Cards like Return to Nature
9.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Blade of the Sixth Pride
No other Selesnya decks run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 0% of other Selesnya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Tolsimir Wolfblood
6.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Jasmine Boreal
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
7.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.84 · 80.4% (3,288 of 4,091 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.83 · 81.3% (3,324 of 4,091 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.83 · 79.1% (3,237 of 4,091 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.84 · 77.2% (3,160 of 4,091 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 0.82 · 79.0% (3,231 of 4,091 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 0.82 · 76.3% (3,123 of 4,091 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.86 · 72.5% (2,966 of 4,091 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.86 · 71.8% (2,938 of 4,091 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.86 · 67.7% (2,768 of 4,091 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 0.84 · 67.2% (2,750 of 4,091 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.87 · 62.7% (2,567 of 4,091 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 0.87 · 60.3% (2,467 of 4,091 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.85 · 61.2% (2,505 of 4,091 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.88 · 56.4% (2,307 of 4,091 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.88 · 55.3% (2,261 of 4,091 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.89 · 52.8% (2,161 of 4,091 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.82 · 58.6% (2,398 of 4,091 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.89 · 49.1% (2,009 of 4,091 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 0.90 · 45.9% (1,877 of 4,091 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.90 · 43.5% (1,778 of 4,091 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 0.90 · 43.1% (1,762 of 4,091 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (1,682 of 4,091 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.91 · 40.4% (1,651 of 4,091 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.91 · 40.0% (1,638 of 4,091 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 0.90 · 40.5% (1,655 of 4,091 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 0.89 · 40.2% (1,645 of 4,091 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 0.91 · 34.5% (1,411 of 4,091 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (1,313 of 4,091 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 0.91 · 32.3% (1,320 of 4,091 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 0.91 · 28.9% (1,183 of 4,091 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 0.90 · 29.8% (1,218 of 4,091 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.94 · 21.8% (890 of 4,091 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 0.94 · 20.9% (856 of 4,091 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 0.94 · 19.9% (816 of 4,091 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.93 · 21.1% (862 of 4,091 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.95 · 18.9% (772 of 4,091 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 0.89 · 23.5% (961 of 4,091 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (802 of 4,091 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.95 · 17.4% (710 of 4,091 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.95 · 17.2% (705 of 4,091 decks)
- Damping Matrix relevance 0.93 · 18.9% (773 of 4,091 decks)
- Glass Golem relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (622 of 4,091 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.74 · 40.0% (1,637 of 4,091 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.95 · 15.6% (639 of 4,091 decks)
- Knight of New Benalia relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (630 of 4,091 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 0.94 · 15.7% (641 of 4,091 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.74 · 37.9% (1,552 of 4,091 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (596 of 4,091 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.80 · 28.3% (1,159 of 4,091 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.88 · 19.3% (791 of 4,091 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.83 · 81.3% (3,324 of 4,091 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.83 · 79.1% (3,237 of 4,091 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.84 · 77.2% (3,160 of 4,091 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 0.82 · 79.0% (3,231 of 4,091 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 0.82 · 76.3% (3,123 of 4,091 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.86 · 72.5% (2,966 of 4,091 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.86 · 71.8% (2,938 of 4,091 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.86 · 67.7% (2,768 of 4,091 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 0.84 · 67.2% (2,750 of 4,091 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.87 · 62.7% (2,567 of 4,091 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 0.87 · 60.3% (2,467 of 4,091 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.85 · 61.2% (2,505 of 4,091 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.88 · 56.4% (2,307 of 4,091 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.88 · 55.3% (2,261 of 4,091 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.89 · 52.8% (2,161 of 4,091 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.82 · 58.6% (2,398 of 4,091 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.89 · 49.1% (2,009 of 4,091 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 0.90 · 45.9% (1,877 of 4,091 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.90 · 43.5% (1,778 of 4,091 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 0.90 · 43.1% (1,762 of 4,091 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (1,682 of 4,091 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.91 · 40.4% (1,651 of 4,091 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.91 · 40.0% (1,638 of 4,091 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 0.90 · 40.5% (1,655 of 4,091 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 0.89 · 40.2% (1,645 of 4,091 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 0.91 · 34.5% (1,411 of 4,091 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (1,313 of 4,091 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 0.91 · 32.3% (1,320 of 4,091 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 0.91 · 28.9% (1,183 of 4,091 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 0.90 · 29.8% (1,218 of 4,091 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.94 · 21.8% (890 of 4,091 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 0.94 · 20.9% (856 of 4,091 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 0.94 · 19.9% (816 of 4,091 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.93 · 21.1% (862 of 4,091 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.95 · 18.9% (772 of 4,091 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 0.89 · 23.5% (961 of 4,091 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (802 of 4,091 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.95 · 17.4% (710 of 4,091 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.95 · 17.2% (705 of 4,091 decks)
- Glass Golem relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (622 of 4,091 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.95 · 15.6% (639 of 4,091 decks)
- Knight of New Benalia relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (630 of 4,091 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 0.94 · 15.7% (641 of 4,091 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (596 of 4,091 decks)
- Besotted Knight // Betroth the Beast relevance 0.93 · 14.0% (573 of 4,091 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 0.95 · 12.1% (494 of 4,091 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 0.95 · 11.4% (465 of 4,091 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 0.95 · 10.6% (433 of 4,091 decks)
- Garenbrig Carver // Shield's Might relevance 0.95 · 10.4% (425 of 4,091 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 0.95 · 9.7% (397 of 4,091 decks)
All artifacts (22)
- Damping Matrix relevance 0.93 · 18.9% (773 of 4,091 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.88 · 19.3% (791 of 4,091 decks)
- Spear of Heliod relevance 0.77 · 26.1% (1,066 of 4,091 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (493 of 4,091 decks)
- Cauldron of Souls relevance 0.87 · 7.1% (289 of 4,091 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.58 · 31.5% (1,287 of 4,091 decks)
- Horn of the Mark relevance 0.79 · 7.6% (312 of 4,091 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.72 · 5.3% (217 of 4,091 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.69 · 5.2% (212 of 4,091 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.54 · 8.6% (353 of 4,091 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.53 · 5.9% (240 of 4,091 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.34 · 35.3% (1,446 of 4,091 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.35 · 24.0% (980 of 4,091 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (316 of 4,091 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (196 of 4,091 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (612 of 4,091 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.35 · 19.1% (780 of 4,091 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.60 · 2.9% (117 of 4,091 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.39 · 5.5% (226 of 4,091 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.28 · 22.1% (903 of 4,091 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.13 · 64.7% (2,648 of 4,091 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 73.1% (2,989 of 4,091 decks)
All enchantments (41)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.84 · 80.4% (3,288 of 4,091 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.74 · 37.9% (1,552 of 4,091 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.80 · 28.3% (1,159 of 4,091 decks)
- Gravity Well relevance 0.91 · 12.9% (526 of 4,091 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.61 · 50.1% (2,049 of 4,091 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.58 · 52.8% (2,162 of 4,091 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.62 · 43.8% (1,791 of 4,091 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (908 of 4,091 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.65 · 36.9% (1,509 of 4,091 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.46 · 60.1% (2,458 of 4,091 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.68 · 20.1% (823 of 4,091 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.75 · 8.5% (346 of 4,091 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.66 · 13.0% (531 of 4,091 decks)
- In the Trenches relevance 0.75 · 5.8% (237 of 4,091 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.68 · 8.5% (347 of 4,091 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.47 · 31.9% (1,305 of 4,091 decks)
- Dictate of Heliod relevance 0.61 · 8.4% (342 of 4,091 decks)
- Blessed Sanctuary relevance 0.64 · 6.2% (253 of 4,091 decks)
- Force of Virtue relevance 0.79 · 3.8% (157 of 4,091 decks)
- Marshal's Anthem relevance 0.68 · 4.5% (185 of 4,091 decks)
- Noble Purpose relevance 0.76 · 3.8% (155 of 4,091 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (445 of 4,091 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.42 · 18.7% (763 of 4,091 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.31 · 38.8% (1,586 of 4,091 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.52 · 4.6% (187 of 4,091 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.60 · 3.4% (140 of 4,091 decks)
- Rabble Rousing relevance 0.54 · 4.0% (165 of 4,091 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.32 · 17.9% (733 of 4,091 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.35 · 11.6% (475 of 4,091 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (683 of 4,091 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.33 · 13.0% (530 of 4,091 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.57 · 2.6% (106 of 4,091 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (359 of 4,091 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (134 of 4,091 decks)
- Champions from Beyond relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (119 of 4,091 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.35 · 5.4% (222 of 4,091 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (383 of 4,091 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (179 of 4,091 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (138 of 4,091 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (161 of 4,091 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (119 of 4,091 decks)
All instants (44)
- Crash the Party relevance 0.90 · 11.1% (453 of 4,091 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.61 · 35.5% (1,454 of 4,091 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.75 · 11.0% (450 of 4,091 decks)
- Your Temple Is Under Attack relevance 0.63 · 17.1% (701 of 4,091 decks)
- Curious Herd relevance 0.85 · 4.6% (189 of 4,091 decks)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.52 · 34.3% (1,402 of 4,091 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.53 · 29.7% (1,216 of 4,091 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.46 · 41.8% (1,711 of 4,091 decks)
- Make a Stand relevance 0.66 · 11.4% (467 of 4,091 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (753 of 4,091 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.62 · 6.9% (281 of 4,091 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.54 · 5.3% (217 of 4,091 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.44 · 14.0% (573 of 4,091 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.53 · 4.9% (201 of 4,091 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (260 of 4,091 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.50 · 5.1% (207 of 4,091 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.39 · 15.4% (631 of 4,091 decks)
- Holy Day relevance 0.65 · 3.1% (126 of 4,091 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (288 of 4,091 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.43 · 8.4% (343 of 4,091 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.37 · 12.9% (526 of 4,091 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.53 · 3.3% (135 of 4,091 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (289 of 4,091 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.36 · 8.4% (343 of 4,091 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.26 · 32.2% (1,319 of 4,091 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (119 of 4,091 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (444 of 4,091 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.22 · 41.0% (1,676 of 4,091 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.50 · 3.1% (127 of 4,091 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (335 of 4,091 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.21 · 35.6% (1,456 of 4,091 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (303 of 4,091 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (280 of 4,091 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (115 of 4,091 decks)
- White Sun's Zenith relevance 0.39 · 2.8% (116 of 4,091 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.13 · 59.7% (2,443 of 4,091 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (109 of 4,091 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (120 of 4,091 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (121 of 4,091 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (134 of 4,091 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (130 of 4,091 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.10 · 64.0% (2,619 of 4,091 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (112 of 4,091 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (115 of 4,091 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.69 · 35.7% (1,462 of 4,091 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.80 · 16.4% (669 of 4,091 decks)
- Phyrexian Rebirth relevance 0.76 · 15.8% (646 of 4,091 decks)
- Rise from the Wreck relevance 0.83 · 7.8% (319 of 4,091 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.80 · 6.4% (263 of 4,091 decks)
- Call of the Conclave relevance 0.76 · 6.3% (256 of 4,091 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.66 · 6.6% (271 of 4,091 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (411 of 4,091 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.51 · 11.7% (477 of 4,091 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.46 · 18.4% (754 of 4,091 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.39 · 33.5% (1,369 of 4,091 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 10.7% (436 of 4,091 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.44 · 18.5% (755 of 4,091 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.35 · 40.7% (1,663 of 4,091 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.61 · 4.4% (179 of 4,091 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.27 · 60.0% (2,453 of 4,091 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.76 · 2.6% (108 of 4,091 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.50 · 6.6% (270 of 4,091 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.32 · 40.5% (1,658 of 4,091 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (292 of 4,091 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.31 · 31.7% (1,298 of 4,091 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.34 · 22.2% (907 of 4,091 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (172 of 4,091 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.28 · 40.1% (1,641 of 4,091 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.62 · 3.1% (126 of 4,091 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (187 of 4,091 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.40 · 6.4% (262 of 4,091 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.23 · 45.7% (1,869 of 4,091 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.20 · 56.4% (2,306 of 4,091 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (282 of 4,091 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (138 of 4,091 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (235 of 4,091 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.53 · 2.6% (105 of 4,091 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (196 of 4,091 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (116 of 4,091 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.74 · 40.0% (1,637 of 4,091 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (257 of 4,091 decks)
All utility lands (31)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.57 · 23.3% (952 of 4,091 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.57 · 12.3% (502 of 4,091 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.44 · 32.7% (1,339 of 4,091 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.56 · 5.6% (231 of 4,091 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.41 · 18.0% (736 of 4,091 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.51 · 4.8% (197 of 4,091 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.42 · 9.4% (385 of 4,091 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.42 · 9.6% (391 of 4,091 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.29 · 37.2% (1,520 of 4,091 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (410 of 4,091 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.40 · 7.4% (304 of 4,091 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.33 · 18.3% (747 of 4,091 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.32 · 20.4% (833 of 4,091 decks)
- Vitu-Ghazi, the City-Tree relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (172 of 4,091 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (231 of 4,091 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (394 of 4,091 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.24 · 31.7% (1,298 of 4,091 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (185 of 4,091 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.29 · 13.4% (550 of 4,091 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.26 · 18.7% (767 of 4,091 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.28 · 9.6% (392 of 4,091 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (307 of 4,091 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (111 of 4,091 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (353 of 4,091 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (124 of 4,091 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (128 of 4,091 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (136 of 4,091 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (111 of 4,091 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (136 of 4,091 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (240 of 4,091 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (169 of 4,091 decks)
All lands (33)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.43 · 21.1% (865 of 4,091 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (319 of 4,091 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (293 of 4,091 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (229 of 4,091 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.33 · 23.8% (972 of 4,091 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.37 · 11.2% (458 of 4,091 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.26 · 37.3% (1,525 of 4,091 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (440 of 4,091 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.35 · 7.8% (319 of 4,091 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.25 · 28.5% (1,167 of 4,091 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (340 of 4,091 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (638 of 4,091 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (182 of 4,091 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.27 · 17.8% (728 of 4,091 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.27 · 14.5% (595 of 4,091 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.21 · 36.3% (1,487 of 4,091 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (110 of 4,091 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (461 of 4,091 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.18 · 49.0% (2,005 of 4,091 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.18 · 43.3% (1,771 of 4,091 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (105 of 4,091 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.43 · 2.5% (104 of 4,091 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.19 · 33.4% (1,366 of 4,091 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 17.2% (705 of 4,091 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.18 · 31.5% (1,288 of 4,091 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (120 of 4,091 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.15 · 37.8% (1,547 of 4,091 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.12 · 59.2% (2,422 of 4,091 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (123 of 4,091 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.10 · 64.4% (2,635 of 4,091 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 76.9% (3,145 of 4,091 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.02 · 91.0% (3,723 of 4,091 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 92.1% (3,766 of 4,091 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jasmine Boreal of the Seven, from 4,091 real Commander decks.