Cards like Cyclonic Rift
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards like Rhystic Study
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 63%
- Mystic Remora 63%
Cards like Commandeer
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Commandeer 39%
- Misdirection 35%
- Snapback 20%
- Disrupting Shoal 14%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystical Tutor 51%
- Merchant Scroll 35%
- Solve the Equation 22%
- Personal Tutor 10%
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Force of Negation
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 55%
- Force of Will 51%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 92%
- Mana Vault 35%
- Grim Monolith 24%
- Basalt Monolith 14%
Cards like Mental Misstep
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mental Misstep 37%
- Flusterstorm 35%
- Dispel 12%
- Miscast 4%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Chrome Mox
5.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 37%
- Mox Diamond 24%
Cards like Wizard Class
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 69%
- Rapid Hybridization 43%
Cards like Swan Song
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 59%
- Strix Serenade 33%
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mirrormade
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aetherize
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Flare of Denial
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Triskaidekaphile
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Reed Richards, Smartest Man, Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan
Cards like Cryptic Command
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other blue decks
Cards like Opt
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Propaganda
9.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
- Propaganda 41%
- War Tax 2%
Cards like Spellseeker
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Spellseeker 22%
- Micromancer 2%
Cards like Brainstorm
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 49%
- Brainsurge 10%
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.35 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.32 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.28 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.28 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.27 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.25 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.25 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.27 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.25 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Knowledge Seeker relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.29 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.19 · 57.1% (28 of 49 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.22 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.22 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.25 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.28 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.26 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.21 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.22 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.28 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.25 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Aven Envoy relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.24 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.20 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Glint-Nest Crane relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.21 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.22 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Rhet-Tomb Mystic relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.20 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.22 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.21 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.20 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.20 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.20 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.16 · 55.1% (27 of 49 decks)
- Keeper of the Nine Gales relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.19 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.19 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.28 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.28 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.27 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.25 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Knowledge Seeker relevance 0.32 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.19 · 57.1% (28 of 49 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.25 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.28 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.26 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Aven Envoy relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Glint-Nest Crane relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Rhet-Tomb Mystic relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.20 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Keeper of the Nine Gales relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.27 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.22 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.20 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.19 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Mocking Doppelganger relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Spire Owl relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Vexing Gull relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Transcendent Dragon relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.19 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.14 · 55.1% (27 of 49 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.21 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Soaring Show-Off relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Ithilien Kingfisher relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Plumecreed Escort relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.18 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Yue, the Moon Spirit relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Owl Familiar relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.18 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Warden of Evos Isle relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.17 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- The Lord of the Eagles relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 0.21 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Torrential Gearhulk relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.25 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.28 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.24 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.20 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.22 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.20 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.22 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Empyrial Plate relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.19 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.18 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.21 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.16 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 0.22 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.16 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.15 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Umezawa's Jitte relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.17 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.14 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.13 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.27 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.29 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.21 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.18 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.19 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 63.3% (31 of 49 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.12 · 63.3% (31 of 49 decks)
- Favorable Winds relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.15 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.13 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.12 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.12 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Nightmares and Daydreams relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- War Tax relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Estrid's Invocation relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Watery Grasp relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Pendrell Mists relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All instants (50)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.35 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.32 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.25 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.22 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.22 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.21 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.22 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.25 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.20 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.20 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.16 · 55.1% (27 of 49 decks)
- Accumulate Wisdom relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.19 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.18 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.18 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- String of Disappearances relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.14 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.19 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.17 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.14 · 53.1% (26 of 49 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 69.4% (34 of 49 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.13 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.15 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.12 · 59.2% (29 of 49 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.10 · 71.4% (35 of 49 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.12 · 51.0% (25 of 49 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.10 · 65.3% (32 of 49 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.14 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.13 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.15 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (21 of 49 decks)
- Whirlwind Denial relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.11 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.13 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Step Through relevance 0.21 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.19 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.19 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.17 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.16 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.15 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Tunnel Vision relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.16 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.14 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Donate relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Winged Words relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Ransack relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Secret of Bloodbending relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.12 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.12 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Mass Diminish relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Aang's Journey relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Turbulent Dreams relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Eagle Vision relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.16 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.14 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.42 · 59.2% (29 of 49 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.30 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.25 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.20 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.15 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.15 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.18 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.16 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 46.9% (23 of 49 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.16 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Tolaria relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.17 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (21 of 49 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.14 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.14 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.14 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.14 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.12 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 61.2% (30 of 49 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.11 · 10.2% (5 of 49 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.10 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.11 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.05 · 61.2% (30 of 49 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Shelldock Isle relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.09 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
All lands (30)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 36.7% (18 of 49 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.18 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.18 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.18 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.15 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 12.2% (6 of 49 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.14 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (4 of 49 decks)
- White Lotus Hideout relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.12 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (2 of 49 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.07 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 89.8% (44 of 49 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Wan Shi Tong, Librarian, from 49 real Commander decks.