Cards like Etherium Sculptor
12× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like O'aka, Traveling Merchant
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Baleful Strix
6.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Esper decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Baleful Strix 48%
- Thought Monitor 30%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 42%
- Urza's Bauble 13%
Cards like Marionette Apprentice
15× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards like Nettlecyst
10× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Nettlecyst 17%
- Cranial Plating 15%
- Adaptive Omnitool 5%
Cards like Aether Spellbomb
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Lotus Petal
11× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 35%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 10%
Cards like Repurposing Bay
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards like Sol Ring
2.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 86% of other Esper decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.97 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 95%
- Mana Vault 10%
- Grim Monolith 3%
- Basalt Monolith 2%
Cards like Instant Ramen
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Rook Turret
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter
19× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
16× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Gifts Ungiven
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Gifts Ungiven 23%
- Intuition 5%
Cards like Power Conduit
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Esper decks
Cards like Mm'menon, the Right Hand
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
12× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Vexing Bauble
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Vexing Bauble 35%
- Void Mirror 3%
Cards like Cryogen Relic
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Esper decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Esper decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.85 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Counterspell 37%
- Dovin's Veto 27%
- Negate 15%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Minor Misstep 2%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Mind Stone
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 20%
- Chromatic Sphere 3%
- Skycloud Egg 2%
- Darkwater Egg 2%
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 85% of other Esper decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Esper decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.97 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 87%
- Commander's Sphere 15%
Cards like Fabricate
4.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Fabricate 23%
- Scour for Scrap 8%
All top picks (50)
- O'aka, Traveling Merchant relevance 0.45 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.44 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Hex Parasite relevance 0.45 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Solemnity relevance 0.44 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.39 · 65.0% (39 of 60 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.42 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Soul Diviner relevance 0.44 · 48.3% (29 of 60 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.45 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.40 · 46.7% (28 of 60 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.36 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.44 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.41 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.43 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.40 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.43 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.38 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.40 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.41 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Voyager Quickwelder relevance 0.40 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Dispatch relevance 0.37 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 0.38 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Mendicant Core, Guidelight relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.41 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.38 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.40 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Biotransference relevance 0.40 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Imotekh the Stormlord relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.36 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.40 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.34 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.38 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.39 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Ring of the Lucii relevance 0.39 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.38 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.37 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.38 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.36 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Machinist's Arsenal relevance 0.39 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
All creatures (50)
- O'aka, Traveling Merchant relevance 0.45 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Hex Parasite relevance 0.45 · 51.7% (31 of 60 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.39 · 65.0% (39 of 60 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.42 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Soul Diviner relevance 0.44 · 48.3% (29 of 60 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.40 · 46.7% (28 of 60 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.36 · 55.0% (33 of 60 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.38 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.40 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Voyager Quickwelder relevance 0.40 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 0.38 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Mendicant Core, Guidelight relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Imotekh the Stormlord relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.36 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.40 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.37 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.38 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.35 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.32 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Bronze Guardian relevance 0.36 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.31 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Pactdoll Terror relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Marionette Apprentice relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Fain, the Broker relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Marionette Master relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Urza, Chief Artificer relevance 0.34 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Scholar of New Horizons relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Ferropede relevance 0.37 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 0.35 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.30 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Illustrious Wanderglyph relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Noxious Gearhulk relevance 0.29 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Psychomancer relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.23 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.44 · 56.7% (34 of 60 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.45 · 36.7% (22 of 60 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.44 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.41 · 41.7% (25 of 60 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.43 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.40 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.43 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.41 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.41 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.38 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.40 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.34 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.38 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Ring of the Lucii relevance 0.39 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.36 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Machinist's Arsenal relevance 0.39 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.36 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Cranial Plating relevance 0.37 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- The Wind Crystal relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.35 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Thopter Foundry relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- White Auracite relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.32 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.34 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Sunbeam Spellbomb relevance 0.36 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.33 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Basilica Skullbomb relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Excalibur II relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.31 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.30 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Dusk Rose Reliquary relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Nihil Spellbomb relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Dragonfire Blade relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Nutrient Block relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.29 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Solemnity relevance 0.44 · 53.3% (32 of 60 decks)
- Biotransference relevance 0.40 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.38 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Ballad of the Black Flag relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.28 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Secrets of the Dead relevance 0.29 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.21 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Stuck in Summoner's Sanctum relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Forge Anew relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Dollmaker's Shop // Porcelain Gallery relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Cruel Reality relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Phyrexian Unlife relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Cemetery Tampering relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Stillness in Motion relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Out of the Tombs relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- The Tale of Tamiyo relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Oppressive Rays relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Midnight Snack relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Blood Reckoning relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Underhanded Designs relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Hardlight Containment relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Detained by Legionnaires relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Angelic Chorus relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Arrest relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Battle of Hoover Dam relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Song of Stupefaction relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Defang relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Spontaneous Mutation relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Tenuous Truce relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dispatch relevance 0.37 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.39 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.34 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.29 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.28 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.31 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.31 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Overkill relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.29 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Swallowed by Leviathan relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Eviscerator's Insight relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.21 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.27 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.24 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.19 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.22 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.25 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Fanatical Offering relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.18 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.20 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (20 of 60 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Grounded for Life relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Stomped by the Foot relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Reroute Systems relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Reckoner's Bargain relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Fabricate relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Organic Extinction relevance 0.31 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Voyage Home relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.25 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Resentful Revelation relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.22 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Haunt the Network relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Legions to Ashes relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Open the Vaults relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- From Father to Son relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Hellish Sideswipe relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Stir Up Trouble relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Exorcise relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Embrace Oblivion relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Terisiare's Devastation relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Approach of the Second Sun relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Stargaze relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Space-Time Anomaly relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Aether Snap relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Tranquilize relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Scour the Desert relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Make an Example relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- United Battlefront relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Tome Scour relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (19)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.37 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.33 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.33 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.28 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Dakkon, Shadow Slayer relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- The Wanderer relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Tezzeret the Schemer relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Ajani, Outland Chaperone relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Teferi, Who Slows the Sunset relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Liliana, Death Mage relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.44 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.37 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.36 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.33 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.35 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Midgar, City of Mako // Reactor Raid relevance 0.34 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.30 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.21 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Castle Doom relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.22 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Nephalia Drownyard relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Clive's Hideaway relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.19 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Contaminated Landscape relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (12 of 60 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.15 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (16 of 60 decks)
- Monumental Henge relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Forum of Amity relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- University Campus relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.15 · 23.3% (14 of 60 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.18 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.15 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.10 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.12 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
All lands (50)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.34 · 43.3% (26 of 60 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.34 · 35.0% (21 of 60 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.34 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.35 · 28.3% (17 of 60 decks)
- Insomnia, Crown City relevance 0.38 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.36 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.35 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Thousand Moons Smithy // Barracks of the Thousand relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Razortide Bridge relevance 0.32 · 21.7% (13 of 60 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.31 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.30 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Treno, Dark City relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Goldmire Bridge relevance 0.29 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.24 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Scoured Barrens relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.24 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Sharlayan, Nation of Scholars relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Sidequest: Catch a Fish // Cooking Campsite relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Tarrian's Journal // The Tomb of Aclazotz relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Idyllic Beachfront relevance 0.25 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Glimmervoid relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (10 of 60 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.22 · 11.7% (7 of 60 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.19 · 18.3% (11 of 60 decks)
- Sunlit Marsh relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.19 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.15 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Dromar's Cavern relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (4 of 60 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (8 of 60 decks)
- Port Town relevance 0.17 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
- Desolate Mire relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (5 of 60 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.14 · 30.0% (18 of 60 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 38.3% (23 of 60 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (15 of 60 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (6 of 60 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.13 · 31.7% (19 of 60 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.15 · 15.0% (9 of 60 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Noctis, Prince of Lucis, from 60 real Commander decks.