Cards like Cackling Counterpart
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
77% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mirror Image
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mirror Image 60%
- Clone 56%
- Stunt Double 48%
- Waxen Shapethief 30%
- Sakashima's Protege 3%
Cards like Clever Impersonator
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Clever Impersonator 57%
- Flesh Duplicate 43%
- Gigantoplasm 29%
Cards like Stolen Identity
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Stolen Identity 38%
- Mirage Mockery 33%
- Relm's Sketching 30%
- Saheeli's Artistry 11%
Other options: March of Progress
Cards like Renegade Doppelganger
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Extravagant Replication
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
5.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 38%
- Hedron Archive 18%
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory 12%
- Sisay's Ring 3%
- Ring of the Lucii 2%
- Ur-Golem's Eye 1%
Other options: Ichor Elixir
Cards like Sky Diamond
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Obsidian Obelisk, Corrupted Grafstone
Cards like Silent Hallcreeper
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Strionic Resonator
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
5.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Bribery
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Worn Powerstone
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards like Metamorphic Alteration
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Fact or Fiction
6.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Truth or Tale, Riddles in the Dark, Fortune's Favor
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 64%
- Negate 42%
- Wash Away 3%
- Essence Scatter 2%
Other options: Disruption Protocol, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Wild Unraveling, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
All top picks (50)
- Mirror Mockery relevance 0.73 · 63.3% (181 of 286 decks)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.73 · 46.9% (134 of 286 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.51 · 74.8% (214 of 286 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.53 · 71.3% (204 of 286 decks)
- Renegade Doppelganger relevance 0.71 · 39.9% (114 of 286 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.57 · 53.8% (154 of 286 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.53 · 60.5% (173 of 286 decks)
- Endless Evil relevance 0.61 · 45.1% (129 of 286 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.54 · 56.6% (162 of 286 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.54 · 53.8% (154 of 286 decks)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.65 · 36.0% (103 of 286 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 0.62 · 37.8% (108 of 286 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (65 of 286 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.49 · 56.3% (161 of 286 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.38 · 78.3% (224 of 286 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.51 · 48.3% (138 of 286 decks)
- Dragon's Hoard relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (45 of 286 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.53 · 43.4% (124 of 286 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.58 · 32.5% (93 of 286 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.42 · 62.2% (178 of 286 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.56 · 32.5% (93 of 286 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.49 · 43.7% (125 of 286 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.47 · 46.9% (134 of 286 decks)
- Mimic Vat relevance 0.59 · 23.4% (67 of 286 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.50 · 38.5% (110 of 286 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.55 · 28.7% (82 of 286 decks)
- Minion Reflector relevance 0.68 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.44 · 44.8% (128 of 286 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.38 · 57.0% (163 of 286 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.50 · 30.1% (86 of 286 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (66 of 286 decks)
- Metamorphic Alteration relevance 0.54 · 17.1% (49 of 286 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.41 · 43.7% (125 of 286 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (85 of 286 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 0.59 · 11.5% (33 of 286 decks)
- Kairi, the Swirling Sky relevance 0.54 · 16.1% (46 of 286 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.49 · 23.4% (67 of 286 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.47 · 27.6% (79 of 286 decks)
- Blade of Shared Souls relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (51 of 286 decks)
- Mirror of the Forebears relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (29 of 286 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.47 · 23.8% (68 of 286 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.47 · 20.3% (58 of 286 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (44 of 286 decks)
- Body Double relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (50 of 286 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.48 · 17.1% (49 of 286 decks)
- Glaring Spotlight relevance 0.52 · 11.9% (34 of 286 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (64 of 286 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.47 · 16.4% (47 of 286 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.45 · 20.3% (58 of 286 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Deceptive Frostkite relevance 0.73 · 46.9% (134 of 286 decks)
- Renegade Doppelganger relevance 0.71 · 39.9% (114 of 286 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.53 · 60.5% (173 of 286 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.54 · 53.8% (154 of 286 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 0.62 · 37.8% (108 of 286 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.49 · 56.3% (161 of 286 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.51 · 48.3% (138 of 286 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.53 · 43.4% (124 of 286 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.42 · 62.2% (178 of 286 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.56 · 32.5% (93 of 286 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.49 · 43.7% (125 of 286 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.55 · 28.7% (82 of 286 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.38 · 57.0% (163 of 286 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.50 · 30.1% (86 of 286 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.41 · 43.7% (125 of 286 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (85 of 286 decks)
- Kairi, the Swirling Sky relevance 0.54 · 16.1% (46 of 286 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.47 · 27.6% (79 of 286 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.47 · 23.8% (68 of 286 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (44 of 286 decks)
- Body Double relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (50 of 286 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.48 · 17.1% (49 of 286 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (64 of 286 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.47 · 16.4% (47 of 286 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.36 · 31.5% (90 of 286 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.36 · 28.3% (81 of 286 decks)
- Mercurial Pretender relevance 0.50 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.39 · 14.3% (41 of 286 decks)
- Identity Thief relevance 0.46 · 6.6% (19 of 286 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.23 · 63.3% (181 of 286 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.34 · 17.5% (50 of 286 decks)
- Phantom Steed relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (24 of 286 decks)
- Unstable Shapeshifter relevance 0.49 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Vesuvan Shapeshifter relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.40 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.40 · 5.2% (15 of 286 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.30 · 19.2% (55 of 286 decks)
- Perplexing Chimera relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.26 · 28.7% (82 of 286 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.23 · 39.9% (114 of 286 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.31 · 12.9% (37 of 286 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (22 of 286 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (28 of 286 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (18 of 286 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.32 · 9.1% (26 of 286 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Omni-Changeling relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.57 · 53.8% (154 of 286 decks)
- Dragon's Hoard relevance 0.70 · 15.7% (45 of 286 decks)
- Mimic Vat relevance 0.59 · 23.4% (67 of 286 decks)
- Minion Reflector relevance 0.68 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Blade of Shared Souls relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (51 of 286 decks)
- Mirror of the Forebears relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (29 of 286 decks)
- Glaring Spotlight relevance 0.52 · 11.9% (34 of 286 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.44 · 23.4% (67 of 286 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.39 · 22.7% (65 of 286 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.36 · 28.0% (80 of 286 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.39 · 12.6% (36 of 286 decks)
- Nim Deathmantle relevance 0.46 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.36 · 15.4% (44 of 286 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.33 · 20.3% (58 of 286 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.27 · 37.8% (108 of 286 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.34 · 13.6% (39 of 286 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.31 · 17.8% (51 of 286 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.34 · 11.9% (34 of 286 decks)
- Soul Foundry relevance 0.45 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Trickster's Talisman relevance 0.41 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.28 · 16.1% (46 of 286 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.23 · 30.1% (86 of 286 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.26 · 15.7% (45 of 286 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.30 · 8.7% (25 of 286 decks)
- Helm of Possession relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.21 · 34.3% (98 of 286 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.22 · 27.6% (79 of 286 decks)
- Mask of Avacyn relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.22 · 25.2% (72 of 286 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.30 · 5.9% (17 of 286 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (12 of 286 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (14 of 286 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (22 of 286 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.24 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (19 of 286 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (30 of 286 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (18 of 286 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 36.0% (103 of 286 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 46.9% (134 of 286 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.24 · 8.7% (25 of 286 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 24.1% (69 of 286 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (29 of 286 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (14 of 286 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Gift relevance 0.35 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Séance Board relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.20 · 12.9% (37 of 286 decks)
All enchantments (44)
- Mirror Mockery relevance 0.73 · 63.3% (181 of 286 decks)
- Endless Evil relevance 0.61 · 45.1% (129 of 286 decks)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.65 · 36.0% (103 of 286 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (65 of 286 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.44 · 44.8% (128 of 286 decks)
- Metamorphic Alteration relevance 0.54 · 17.1% (49 of 286 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 0.59 · 11.5% (33 of 286 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.45 · 20.3% (58 of 286 decks)
- False Demise relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (25 of 286 decks)
- Infinite Reflection relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (25 of 286 decks)
- Back from the Brink relevance 0.53 · 6.6% (19 of 286 decks)
- Annex relevance 0.47 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.41 · 8.4% (24 of 286 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.35 · 8.4% (24 of 286 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (41 of 286 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (14 of 286 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (19 of 286 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.23 · 17.8% (51 of 286 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Kumena's Awakening relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (14 of 286 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (22 of 286 decks)
- Roiling Dragonstorm relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.22 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Mind Unbound relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.15 · 24.1% (69 of 286 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.15 · 26.2% (75 of 286 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.14 · 25.5% (73 of 286 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
All instants (50)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.51 · 74.8% (214 of 286 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.54 · 56.6% (162 of 286 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.47 · 46.9% (134 of 286 decks)
- Polymorphous Rush relevance 0.52 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.29 · 41.3% (118 of 286 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.33 · 26.6% (76 of 286 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (22 of 286 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.35 · 12.9% (37 of 286 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.36 · 9.4% (27 of 286 decks)
- Fleeting Reflection relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (18 of 286 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.30 · 20.6% (59 of 286 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (18 of 286 decks)
- Twincast relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Desertion relevance 0.34 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Fumble relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (12 of 286 decks)
- Illusionist's Gambit relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (17 of 286 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.25 · 15.4% (44 of 286 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.30 · 6.6% (19 of 286 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.26 · 11.2% (32 of 286 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.20 · 22.0% (63 of 286 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (29 of 286 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.29 · 4.2% (12 of 286 decks)
- Repulse relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (29 of 286 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.23 · 11.2% (32 of 286 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.22 · 11.5% (33 of 286 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (17 of 286 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.15 · 37.1% (106 of 286 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (34 of 286 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.14 · 42.3% (121 of 286 decks)
- Epiphany at the Drownyard relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (30 of 286 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.20 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (17 of 286 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.16 · 21.7% (62 of 286 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (17 of 286 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.12 · 45.8% (131 of 286 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 17.5% (50 of 286 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.13 · 33.6% (96 of 286 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.15 · 23.8% (68 of 286 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.53 · 71.3% (204 of 286 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.38 · 78.3% (224 of 286 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.58 · 32.5% (93 of 286 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.50 · 38.5% (110 of 286 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.58 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (66 of 286 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.49 · 23.4% (67 of 286 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.47 · 20.3% (58 of 286 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.41 · 30.1% (86 of 286 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.41 · 22.0% (63 of 286 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (32 of 286 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.39 · 16.1% (46 of 286 decks)
- Self-Reflection relevance 0.43 · 7.0% (20 of 286 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.35 · 15.0% (43 of 286 decks)
- Zndrsplt's Judgment relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.31 · 15.7% (45 of 286 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (15 of 286 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.33 · 8.4% (24 of 286 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (18 of 286 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (37 of 286 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.23 · 12.6% (36 of 286 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (27 of 286 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (12 of 286 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (16 of 286 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.18 · 17.5% (50 of 286 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.17 · 21.3% (61 of 286 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.15 · 27.3% (78 of 286 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Knowledge Exploitation relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (15 of 286 decks)
- Subjugate the Hobbits relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (33 of 286 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
All utility lands (36)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.55 · 23.1% (66 of 286 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.36 · 50.7% (145 of 286 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.45 · 25.2% (72 of 286 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.49 · 15.7% (45 of 286 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.40 · 12.6% (36 of 286 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.33 · 15.4% (44 of 286 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 30.1% (86 of 286 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (55 of 286 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (22 of 286 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (27 of 286 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (29 of 286 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (19 of 286 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 12.9% (37 of 286 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (19 of 286 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (13 of 286 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.18 · 11.5% (33 of 286 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 19.2% (55 of 286 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.15 · 17.1% (49 of 286 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (12 of 286 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.17 · 7.3% (21 of 286 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 48.3% (138 of 286 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (23 of 286 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (30 of 286 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 38.5% (110 of 286 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (15)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (43 of 286 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.23 · 9.1% (26 of 286 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (31 of 286 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (40 of 286 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (11 of 286 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (8 of 286 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (10 of 286 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (9 of 286 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (7 of 286 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (12 of 286 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 85.0% (243 of 286 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Keiga, the Tide Star, from 286 real Commander decks.